Rush Limbaugh Sticks Up for Video Games

Recommended Videos

NEDM

New member
Apr 13, 2010
58
0
0
This isn't the first time he has stood up against video game legislation. The Dems tried back in the 90's to get game legislation in before. Why people openly want the government to tell them what to do, how to spend their money, what they can eat, etc, has always confused me. Has no one read 1984, Brave New World, fahrenheit 451, animal farm?

Luckily it's only in california, and i could care less if they pass another wackadoo law.
 

lacktheknack

Je suis joined jewels.
Jan 19, 2009
19,305
0
0
Sneaklemming said:
Im confused - so is it the liberals in america that are trying to bad games, or the conservatives?
Neither and both. It's non-partisian.

On one hand, Tipper Gore, Joe Lieberman (Liberals) along with FOX (Conservative) and Schwarzenegger ("Conservative") are pro censorship, while others, like Limbaugh (Conservative) and every single gamer (Liberal and Conservative) are against it.
 

lacktheknack

Je suis joined jewels.
Jan 19, 2009
19,305
0
0
Personally, I'm glad that everyone's head is exploding, maybe we'll all learn the concept of "centrism", "There's no such thing as perfect extremism" and "Every political commentator clip on YouTube is horrendously biased" and maybe even "READ HIS DAMN BOOKS, SHEEP!"

And no, I refuse to take that back. I try never to base opinions of political activists off of the internet (what with it being accurate and... stuff), I always read a book they've written first, where nothing is off the cuff, and is usually well thought out and is backed up.

For this reason, I personally like Rush Limbaugh (!?) and Glenn Beck (!?!?!?!?!?!?!?) because they actually aren't completely nuts on paper. Agree? Not always, but I don't hate them either.
 

Redd the Sock

New member
Apr 14, 2010
1,088
0
0
First off, as a liberal, god forbid we start acknowledging we can have common ground on issues, and that sometimes what makes our decisons isn't out idoliogy, but how it affects us personally. Parents and politicians attack games because they don't play them. We defend them because we do. Thus attacks come from both side of the isle.

Second, let's not give Rush too much credit here. He's big on the standard "small government" postition so this would be his default position sight unseen. With the current political climate, saying otherwise would get him flak, and a clip on the Daily Show's game of "show the republicans contridict themselves". I'm not saying he isn't serious here, but neither am I convinced he wasn't just playing to the crowd against his true position, or that he hasn't stated otherwise in the past (what would he say to the same question around Columbine for example.)
 

TeeBs

New member
Oct 9, 2010
1,563
0
0
Its isn't a right or left issue, it shouldn't even be a issue, though it is commonly stated that the right wants cencorship of games since the majority of people who are for banning these types of games are religious folks. Which are more often then not Republicans.
 

Autofaux

New member
Aug 31, 2009
483
0
0
And the soccer moms and swing voters of America are halted for a second, confused as to whether they should listen to their favourite xenophobe or the liberal Senator who speaks their language..
 

Guilen-

New member
Mar 14, 2009
53
0
0
Uh... Rush Limbaugh... why do I feel like this is some kind of... warning... lol
 

jaing1138

New member
May 25, 2010
134
0
0
So this whole case is based off the whinings of whinging sexless mothers who are too stupid to look at the age ratings that are clearly shown on the boxes against big corporate entities that probably generate a lot of money for the u.s government via tax and whatnot...? yeah i think this is the one time where what would seem a real unfair fact of life will work in our favour. The only reason this has gone as far as it has is because arnie jumped on the bandwagon, though i think the defence will rip him apart if he makes any appearences predator, terminator, total recall . Common sence will prevail as always its never reached this far before but every other time we've beaten them before and if we beat them at the u.s supreme court we can beat them pretty much anywhere and will give us a very good example to use in future cases and if they find in favour of us it should to my understanding pretty much legitimise video games as an art. Personally I'm not worried and I think good times for the industry are on their way.

Edit: "We can't be consumed by our petty differences anymore.

We will be united in our common interests.

Perhaps its fate that today is the 2nd of November, and you will once again be fighting for our freedom, not from tyranny, oppression, or persecution -- but from annihilation.

We're fighting for our right to live, to exist.

And should we win the day, the 2nd of November will no longer be known as an average day, but as the day when the world of gamers declared in one voice:

"We will not go quietly into the night!

We will not vanish without a fight!

We're going to live on!

We're going to survive!"

Today, we celebrate our Independence Day!"
 

Parnage

New member
Apr 13, 2010
107
0
0
Left? Right? Who cares what side is on what. What I care about is freedom of speech. So does Rush. That's something we can get behind and have common ground. I mean really having actually listened to him he does make good points on a lot of issues.

No one R,D or Other has the right to regulate something the industry is already doing. I think we can call agree on that.
 

aPod

New member
Jan 14, 2010
1,101
0
0
Sir John the Net Knight said:
Bolo The Great said:
I think he's made the right decision (he even implied videogames were art!) but i think maybe for the wrong reasons. The cynical part of me thinks it's more of a stick to beat the democrats with than a commitment to videogames as such but we should take free allies like this as we can get them.

Censorship is one of the things i think thr right has right and we should try and publicise this issue ammougst anyone who has any kind of free-speech interests. You can say what you like about Limbaugh but at least he IS commited to the 1st amendment and i don't see any other public media figure, i mean this is perfect Daily Show fodder for christs sake!, defending videogames in the slightest. So i have to give him credit where it is due.

The Republican party would do well to stake a calim to free speech as a core value becuase at the moment all they seem to be doing is frankly crazy antics and weird rhetoric. They need to take a leaf out of the UK conservative's book and try and re-brand themselves as more of a 'smart power' party rather than a 'fucking crazy' party.
Is the right reason always the Democrat/Liberal/Obama reason? Do you even know that the new wave of conservatives coming into Washington are Constitutionalists? Do you know that most conservatives hate the Westboro Baptist Church? Have you considered the possibility that Hollywood might be a major player in this bill as it might remove the gaming industry as competition? Are you aware that it's mostly liberals that are in the anti-free speech arenas now? Do you ever think for yourself instead of letting Jon Stewart think for you?

Seriously, we have close to 400 comments on this in a separate thread. There are actually people who put their support of the medium in question because Limbaugh defended it, and are still bluntly in denial that this law was authored by a highly liberal democrat. I am dumbfounded by the amount of people on this site who refuse to research this issue and simply allow liberal propaganda to guide their viewpoints.

I would not begin to question anyone's decision to defend free speech regardless of their political party. But in all honesty, do you really expect that the liberal media would stand up for us? I saw a clip from Blizzcon on "The Soup" on E! earlier today. And the entire point of that clip was to make people like us look like retarded troglodytes who've never come in contact with women. Hey aren't a lot of the people here women? I could have sworn they were. But yeah, they still lump us in with the stereotypical pocket protectors, taped glasses, stupid hair...actually this is what the liberals think we are...

[/quote]

Thank you, thank you, thank you... I am so happy that somebody much more intelligent than I said this before I got a chance to say it in a disorganized and confusing manner.

Unfortunately, it's not hip to be conservative round her' and any conservative figure is automatically judged as idiotic, pompous and unwanted. Sigh... sigh... sigh.

Everyone should defend their constitutional rights, especially the first amendment. Above that everybody should learn what their constitutional rights are... there is an astonishingly large number of americans who don't. Anyways John nice point.
 

Gamegodtre

New member
Aug 24, 2009
622
0
0
hmmm dunno how to feel about this
well i never really didn't like him personally so
Go RUSH Go
 

bigo2mags

New member
Apr 7, 2008
7
0
0
subject_87 said:
Hmm... I'd be willing to form an uneasy alliance with Mr. Limbaugh if he's on our side for this. Really, who'da thought that Rush Limbaugh of all people would support us?
/r/ a Smash Bros. 'New Challenger' poster with Rush Limbaugh's silhouette -- kthxbai
 

Senaro

New member
Jan 5, 2008
554
0
0
This is the first time Limbaugh has said something that hasn't made me want to smash my head against a table. This is weird.
 

cptawesome

New member
Nov 2, 2009
157
0
0
I've never been a huge fan of Limbaugh, but when I heard what he was saying about games and the 1st amendment in general, people slowly backed away from me as I fist-pumped violently enough to dent steel. As a junior junior junior broadcaster and journalist and gamer, I'm anxiously awaiting the November 2nd decision.
 

DTWolfwood

Better than Vash!
Oct 20, 2009
3,715
0
0
Wholly unexpected but duly appreciated. When a right wing man can get behind this issue for the industry, there is hope for our country yet!
 

GonzoGamer

New member
Apr 9, 2008
7,060
0
0
Shihoudani said:
As for Rush not being a viable voice in media, having the most listened to news radio program doesn't make you viable? Hmm, seems kind of odd. You may not follow his political views but the man is very viable to a large audience of people.
As someone that likes perspective, I've listened to him (even watched some of his tv show back in the day) and I'm not sure you can consider that news. Would you call the Daily Show news? He's like a right wing version of that, just without the funny writers. But if you do consider them news, Stewart and Colbert have come out at the defense of video games many times too.

I will say however that it is good to see there is at least one thing we're all in agreement on. It only took over 15 years to find it.

When it comes to censorship there are more than enough dbags on the left and the right trying to ruin everyone's fun that I don't think it is a politically tainted issue.