As much as I'd like to disagree with the scientists, that pretty much describes me!
Damn there observation!
Damn there observation!
Ah well I say 'nagging' grannies and grandpas' there will always be exception, and general findings? I chalk that up when over a million or so cases have been studied, not 500 specially picked out people. Because thats just not broad enough.EgoDeusEst said:Perhaps you don't fit the exact terms that the study concluded.Charli said:Ah bullshit I am impervious in your attempts to burn my retinas anymore.
I know I'm not the absolute picturesque of 20 year old Female health. But I'm far from miserable, or fat.
Pathetic study.
Once again the factor of 'How much' and 'What else' has been casually over looked to churn out a number to satisfy the nagging grannies and grandpas of the world. Sad.
The study just sums up the general findings. As for the findings themselves I fit none of them. Not anymore at least.
Spending money to come up with this conclusion was a waste.
As for your own assumption that grandparents are just waiting for something to shake their fists at... Oh I wouldn't be so sure about that
Someone will always stick out![]()
Now that is a beautiful rant. I salute you.Nuke_em_05 said:Wait... if I sit around all day doing minimal physical activity... and don't go out and meet real people in person... I'll get fat and depressed? Well done science... *clap*... *clap*. Actually... "science" has proved this before. "Science" keeps proving this... maybe someone proved this using science, and people keep having the need to re-prove it.
But, it's all in how you figure it out. We asked him, he said yes. We studied his behavior to see if it matched that of someone who was catholic, it did. We asked members of the Catholic church if they considered him Catholic, they said yes. We can't be conlcusive until we ask members outside of Catholicism if they think he's Catholic. Then we'll prove it for sure!Gardenclaw said:In other news scientists find out that Pope is Catholic.........
That's it, I'm changing my motto. Personal responsibility. Yes, spending all day playing video games without any physical activity or personal social interaction is bad. So is sitting at home reading books, or collecting stamps, or watching television, or drinking, at that level. Games don't force you to play them. Sony didn't hold a gun to your head and make you buy the PS3 (though that's probably their next marketing step), Microsoft didn't freeze your assets until you played Halo 3 for 72 hours straight to become the first Major-General (or whatever), Nintendo didn't hold your children hostage to make you... I don't know... do something with the Wii. Nothing is forcing people to game more than other important life activities. To claim the marketing does it just a cop-out. I'm a fat lazy gamer because I choose to game. I recognize that I wouldn't be if I went for more walks and played videogames less. I just don't, and it's not because a commercial told me to.
Here here! And I also know that the majority of my gaming friends are very skinny. Like me.velcthulhu said:I'd say some "scientists" need to go look up the difference between correlation and causation. Also, I believe that someone who considers "reduced extroversion" a flaw should not have their opinions on human behavior taken seriously.
Also, I'm underweight and happy, despite the heinous influence of my WoW subscription.