And yet, when people start defending criticism, you accuse them of defending abuse and death threats. You have been entirely unwilling to separate the two.
Because no-one was against valid criticism in this thread. No-one so people were arguing with strawmen rather than what people are actually saying and as for being unwilling to separate the two..........
How many times do I have to make a clear distinction?
This will be the 21st time doing so.
21 times.
Are you blind?
Are you drunk?
Are you just not reading what I and others have been writing?
Or
Are you deliberately refusing to understand it because having that distinction harms your argument?
This is a fucking malicious lie. Stop repeating it.
So if it is a lie why do you keep conflating the two and carrying on this charade of lying through your teeth claiming I've been conflating the two things when time and time again I've been clear in making the distinction between the two?
You talk about malice but I've stated my position and made it clear 21 times in this thread. 21 times.
You've chosen not to actually clarify your position but just claim people are lying about it.
So don't keep complaining about it being a lie when you seemingly are deliberately refusing to actually clarify your actual position at this point.
Why do you keep accusing me of arguing against valid criticism being allowed despite me clarifying my position 21 times?
How come despite me asking question after question do you answer none yourself just demand I answer your accusations time and time again often the same accusations I've already answered?
Or (C) One moment you say criticisms and abuse are clearly different, and then the next moment you conflate them again. You're being wildly inconsistent, and running with whatever is convenient for your rhetoric at the time.
If you want me to accept that you see them as clearly separate, then don't just devolve into interchanging them again. Because right now, I think it's just a hollow defence.
No I'm not.
Maybe sober up before reading this because your personal incredulity is not my problem at this point when 21 times I've made it clear. You refusing to accept my position is the problem here.
You seemingly demanding I take the position you want because it's easier to argue with rather than actually arguing with the position I have.
Start arguing vs what I'm saying and not what you want me to or trying to demand I take the position you want.
I haven't been devolving into interchanging them you've been devolving into trying to claim making up absolute bullshit out of malice was just valid criticism. Which if you so believe then I fully encourage you to start criticising me using that method here to see just how far accusing me of I don't know being a wanted terrorist or something?
I mean in your view it's just criticism right?
Unless you'd like to tacitly admit there is a difference by not making malicious false claims about me.
It's not in that video. As far as I can see, he tweeted once saying that Arkansas' bill preventing trans kids from accessing healthcare is "genocidal". Which may not be technically correct, but is certainly understandable given the grotesquely cruel nature of the bill.
He didn't accuse Cawthon of advocating or condoning genocide, no. He accused Cawthon of tacitly supporting the Republican candidates' cruelty through his donations. Which is true.
Well I'd say look again because it's there.
