- Apr 26, 2020
- United Kingdom
And yet, when people start defending criticism, you accuse them of defending abuse and death threats. You have been entirely unwilling to separate the two.And is every dog a Great Dane?
Therefore it's not the only way for something to be cancel culture.
This is a fucking malicious lie. Stop repeating it.Yes we get it you think threatening to kill people is a valid form of criticism.
I doubt most people would agree. You think making insane false claims just to damage peoples reputation is valid criticism. Again most people wouldn't agree.
Or (C) One moment you say criticisms and abuse are clearly different, and then the next moment you conflate them again. You're being wildly inconsistent, and running with whatever is convenient for your rhetoric at the time.If it's not a Strawman then how come despite 20 times in this thread clearly separating valid criticism from threats and libel are you still arguing this point? The only way position you have where continuing to argue this same line despite 20 times being told it's wrong is
A) You believe that death threats and libel are just valid criticims
B) You're strawmanning me and potentially others here.
If you want me to accept that you see them as clearly separate, then don't just devolve into interchanging them again. Because right now, I think it's just a hollow defence.
It's not in that video. As far as I can see, he tweeted once saying that Arkansas' bill preventing trans kids from accessing healthcare is "genocidal". Which may not be technically correct, but is certainly understandable given the grotesquely cruel nature of the bill.Oh so you're claiming Jim never said about Genocide?
You really want to go down this line?
People can and will go back and watch it you know?
So you want to stick with your claim?
He didn't accuse Cawthon of advocating or condoning genocide, no. He accused Cawthon of tacitly supporting the Republican candidates' cruelty through his donations. Which is true.