Sex.

Recommended Videos

Nuke_em_05

Senior Member
Mar 30, 2009
827
0
21
It depends on the person, I would think.

I think the important part is to make sure you be responsible about it. The primary function of the act is reproduction, so I think anyone going into it, even with precautions, should understand and accept that possibility.

Is it just pleasure or just a relationship thing is simply up to the two involved in at that instance.

If you treat it as just pleasure without a relationship factor, you essentially are just using the other person as a masturbatory aid. Maybe you want to make sure they get their rocks off too, but your endgame is your pleasure. If that's how someone wants to see it, and both parties have that understanding, then fine. If you treat it as a mutual gain, working towards each other's pleasure and such, then cool. If you treat it as an expression of emotion and relationship, then again, make sure both parties understand that. You don't want a pleasure person mixed in with an interpersonal person. So as far as long-term and monogamy issues go, if a person treats it as an interpersonal interaction, they probably don't want to share, but maybe they do with an understanding that with them it is interpersonal and with others it is just pleasure.

For me and my wife, it is an interpersonal thing, and a pleasure thing, also a reproductive thing, and some or all at once. Sometimes we have sex to express our love and affirm each other, sometimes we have sex just to get our rocks off, and sometimes we have sex to have babies. None of those are mutually exclusive in any given instance. We are monogamous because we consider it a part of our relationship, not to be shared with others.

Other people might not consider sex an exclusive part of their relationship, and that's fine, so long as both parties understand and accept that.

So, it comes down to the individuals in each instance. You can't just comprehensively compartmentalize something like sex. Well, you can, but that doesn't mean it will work out.
 

Harkonnen64

New member
Jul 14, 2010
559
0
0
holy_secret said:
Sex is an amazing thing and actually the only "natural" thing that I think makes sense.
Sex is not sacred nor is it something to play around with. It is a way to entertain yourself and another one (or several if you're into that sort of things). If there is love involved, it can be one of the most intimate and meaningful experience you can experience with someone else. It's a combination of mental/emotional and physical pleasure.

If there is no love, it is still a very nice thing to do. It releases a lot of hormones which make you feel better, improve your self confidence and do a lot of other nice things.

There is only risk for STDs if you go unprotected. That is not due to sex, that is due to idiocy. It's like blaming the bloiling pot when you pick it up without a glove and get burned.
You damn, sexy ninja you...

Yeah, I think sex is great, but something that should only be done with someone you trust.
 

General BrEeZy

New member
Jul 26, 2009
962
0
0
I wont try and stop anyone else, but I hold it sacred, its supposed to be the last part of bonding, the deal-sealer; and AFTER marriage at that. THEN the pleasure comes into play...which frankly, im excited for, but waitings just fine!
 

smithy_2045

New member
Jan 30, 2008
2,561
0
0
I don't believe sex to be sacred. However, I will only consider sex with people I know well and trust.
 

sam42ification

Senior Member
Nov 11, 2010
416
0
21
Sex is a natural activity we do every so often... I don't think holding it back till marriage is a very good idea because fighting your hormones is hard and sex does releave stress and makes you happy (somtimes). It has been built into us to reproduce and the pleasure of sex is the icing on the cake. Still i do think that you should only have sex with some one special and i do think people should get to know their partners a bit before they decide to have sex. I also beleive you should be at least 16 before you have sex and safe sex is encouraged. I do think there is a big difference in having sex and making love. Sex it quiet simple compared to making love and there are ways of stimualting sex but there isn't any way to simulate making love. I think that you can have sex with pretty much any one and get kind of the same results but you can't make love with just any one.

If you look at other animals they all have sex but i don't think you will see any animal making love (i could be wronge but i don't to much attention to animals getting busy)... I think love is somthing so complexe that only humans experience it (again i could be wrong). And don't think you could say they are the same thing.
 

Hap2

New member
May 26, 2010
280
0
0
Everin said:
That's the topic. But what do you think about sex? Like, do you think it's sacred, do you think it's just an activity, do you think it's something that you should wait to do, or dive right in on the first date? Would you do it with a stranger, or only with someone you truely know? Just your thoughts on sex. And why? :)
It means quite little to me, I have never had any inclination to pursue it and I can happily live without it. If I were to do it, it would have to be with someone I truly loved and cared about that needed it in our relationship. Otherwise I couldn't care less, there are more important and more interesting things for me to do.
 

AlexWinter

New member
Jun 24, 2009
401
0
0
It's a delicate topic.

If you're not with someone you love your first time is really fucking awkward.
If you're with someone you love it's still pretty damn awkward.
But waiting is pointless, it's awesome after that.

Fucking, sex and making love are different things. In my opinion you shouldn't really fuck anyone. That makes me a hypocrite but I don't have these shining qualities that a man should possess.

Sex is pretty cool. Get as much of it as you can. Have a laugh, enjoy your bloody life. Win. What can you buy with regrets for fictional sins? Just be safe and all that jazz.

I imagine making love is something you save until you're married anyway, deliberately or not.

What you and someone else consent to doing behind closed doors is your own business. People can't judge you for it any more than they can judge you for liking apples or having brown eyes. Be happy and make others happy.
 

Divine Miss Bee

avatar under maintenance
Feb 16, 2010
730
0
0
i think sex is just a lot of fun. i do tend to save it until the third or fourth date in the interest of making my partner work for it a little, but i've never seen anything wrong with girls who put out whenever they feel like it. just do it safely and there is no reason not to enjoy yourself to the fullest. life is too short to put off having sex until you're in your late twenties or early thirties, and people really shouldn't be getting married until they have careers. thus, have sex before marriage. also, having sex before marriage can actually point you in the right direction as far as chemistry and compatibility.
 

Booradlee

New member
Jul 3, 2011
31
0
0
Everin said:
I think that sex is something that should be saved til the wedding bed, personally. I think that it is the ultimate act of love and it bonds you with the person you share it with.
I am studying psychology. Being the go to guy on advice or just listening to friends and strangers I've heard a Lot of stories. I've also heard a few stories about after marriage.

Sex is a complicated subject. That's what it mostly comes down to. People say wait until you are ready, but nobody defines the word 'Ready'. Everyone looks at sex differently, in their own way. That doesn't change the fact that it's an important part in everyone's life. It's part of who we are and how we express ourselves.

If you do wait until marriage it should support the fact that you two are rather dedicated and disciplined. Which will help your marriage last. Marriage should never be done half way.

but I think more importantly. Don't go into marriage without talking about sex. A LOT. You both have expectations, tons of them. Talk about them. Fantasies, kinks, or just things to try.

You can find out if you're sexually compatible without having sex. Make sure that you are.


Good luck, and keep strong. You're going to need a lot of will power.
 

P.Tsunami

New member
Feb 21, 2010
431
0
0
I think people put too much stock into sex and/or making love. It's all just biology. Added note, I think "saving yourself" for marriage is a crazy idea (although a crazy idea anyone is free to make). Sexual chemistry is very important for a relationship. It's crucial information best learned sooner rather than later, and I never got why people would want to go into a serious relationship flying blind. But, hey, one of the good things about living in a liberal society is you're free to make your own choices as long as they do not harm anyone else.
 

Jamboxdotcom

New member
Nov 3, 2010
1,276
0
0
Daystar Clarion said:
There's a difference between sex and making love.

Context is everything.

I prefer the latter. The results of the former can be obtained with one of your hands.

I've always thought waiting until marriage for sex is a but ridiculous if I'm honest. Your sexuality is just as important as you personality, it is a vital part of a relationship and waiting until marriage to learn about it is very risky.
Basically this. Plus, while i feel that sex is somewhat sacred, in my opinion the idea of "waiting until marriage" leads too many people to marry too young and/or marry only for sex. Sex should not be a reason to get married (or at least not a major reason).
 

Svenparty

New member
Jan 13, 2009
1,345
0
0
Good for pleasure but the curse is that all the horrible STD's like children. I know you can use condoms but it doesn't always work just ask any miserable father under 30.
 

Saelune

Trump put kids in cages!
Legacy
Mar 8, 2011
8,410
16
23
As an extended virgin (ie 20+) it is a mystery to me. Mostly because it is somewhat dirty (not wrong mind you, just best word I can think of) and heavily desired. But then people tell me its overrated, and sitcoms make sex seem very mundane.
 

jawakiller

New member
Jan 14, 2011
776
0
0
I clicked on the thread because of the name. That was successful shit if I ever saw it.

Oh, and sex is fun. Thought I should answer that seeing how its the kind of the topic. But I guess guys saying that is pretty normal. Oh its true though.

Especially... You know what? Never mind.
 

Blow_Pop

Supreme Evil Overlord
Jan 21, 2009
4,861
0
0
Mackheath said:
OT; Sex is sex. "Love making" (though I am cynical of love existing) is for two people who wish to bond in the most intimite way.

Personally I choose lust over 'love'; at least then you know what you are getting and no-one is hurt. That, and animalistic, sordid, sweaty sex is preferable to gentle lovemaking.

To quote the song, we ain't nuthin' but mammals...

EDIT; Forgot to add, but it would take someone truely special to be able to thaw me out to 'love.' They don't need to be drop-dead gorgeous or sickeningly kind, just to have...it, if you get me.
I agree. Sex is sex. Nothing special. And being on both ends (the love-making and the animalistic sordid sweaty sex) I prefer the animalistic, sordid, sweaty sex.
 

intheweeds

New member
Apr 6, 2011
814
0
0
Everin said:
That's the topic. But what do you think about sex? Like, do you think it's sacred, do you think it's just an activity, do you think it's something that you should wait to do, or dive right in on the first date? Would you do it with a stranger, or only with someone you truely know? Just your thoughts on sex. And why? :)

I think that sex is something that should be saved til the wedding bed, personally. I think that it is the ultimate act of love and it bonds you with the person you share it with. It's like you take the core of yourself and place it in the other person's possesion and if you do it with lots of people regularly, you split that core and violate yourself. But thats just my opinion :)

EDIT: When I say sex, I mean making love as well, not defining between sex and love making.
If your title is 'Sex.' , then the only acceptable first line is: "Now that i have your attention [something else entirely]."

I am disappoint. :(
 

Spade Lead

New member
Nov 9, 2009
1,039
0
0
NinjaDuckie said:
I was averse to joining the leagues of people from my generation who jumped into casual sex really early, and I'm honestly pretty glad, because it means I had the conviction to keep to a strict moral code that governed my behavior in both public and private since I was about thirteen or fourteen.

That said, my 21st birthday approaches next year and I'm still a virgin, though there are lots of guys who would like very much to get in my pants. And I kind of want to lose it before my 21st, but I also don't. Like, I want my first time to be special, and almost like if I just leap impulsively and do it as a throwaway moment it won't be the same, or I'll have lost a part of me or something. I'm not sure.

So it's not like I'm being forced to be a virgin, it's just that I would feel wrong about it. I'm not a religious person and I don't particularly believe in the institution of marriage, but I guess the thing I've most missed out on while growing up was a romantic, long-term relationship, so that's what I'd probably need to have before I could jump into sex. A boyfriend who's willing to wait and love me for who I am rather than be focused on casual sex... the person who apparently doesn't exist in modern society. ¬_¬
We exist, we are just usually taken by women who view sex at least a LITTLE more cavalierly than you do. I was 19 when I lost my virginity to my fiancee. It was special, and I regret it because I missed out on dozens of opportunities for sex to save myself for that special someone, who ended up being an evil *****. In fact, My first fuck-buddy is now my girlfriend, and things are great between us.
 

Dags90

New member
Oct 27, 2009
4,680
0
0
I find the idea of having sex outside a marriage as "violating one's self" laughable. Marriages are a piece of paper, and a large portion of them end in divorce, including the ones who "saved themselves".

Sex is fun, it's even more fun if you just let your hair down and enjoy it for what it is.
 

Loner Jo Jo

New member
Jul 22, 2011
172
0
0
I used to think sex was this big deal, that I should wait, but then I started fooling around and I realized it's really not. Sex only matters when you're not getting any or what you're getting isn't any good.

I don't believe in "free love," if anyone even still uses that term, if only because it's not safe anymore. One night stands are not my bag, and I find them to be rather reckless in this day and age. On the other side of the coin, I find waiting until the wedding night to be reckless as well. To deny that sex is not an important component to a healthy relationship, you run the risk of it ruining your relationship. A person's true nature comes out in the bedroom; problems with compatibility will crop up there before they come up at the dinner table or anywhere else. I would never marry someone until after I had sex with them.
 

Zorak the Mantis

Senior Member
Oct 17, 2007
415
0
21
Yes, I like sex, it's pretty awesome. But to be honest I prefer "love making" because it is more intimate. I prefer getting to know someone before I get down to it, but a random fling can sometimes lead to a good thing, it's just not for me though. Spontaneous intimate sex is usually the best sex.

Personally I don't think sacred is the right word to describe it, more like private or intimate. I also don't think waiting until marriage is the best plan. Your first time doing it is probably the most awkward and nerve wracking thing you ever do in life, but it is certainly special. So waiting for the right moment to engage in the act can be important, just don't put it off forever, because you'll be kicking yourself for all those wasted opportunities :p