Well it's also that when a man rapes a woman, he's a monster who deserves death, but if a woman rapes or abuses a man she's a female crusader, she empowers other women and is considered a hero. We've seen this to many times to be able to deny that.Father Time said:Oh I see so men get raped and not taken seriously. Women are portrayed as being weak. Men are so getting the better end of this deal.chowderface said:I'll give you one. Some guy on the front page mentioned that woman-on-man abuse or rape is drastically underreported, and when it is reported it's usually laughed out. That only sounds like it favors women because of context.Da Orky Man said:In what way? I keep on being passed over for jobs because a woman applied too.GabbleDabble said:This is ridiculious. Women are still oppressed and men are still the oppresors.
What that really says is that women are weak. Pathetic. Worthless. What kind of a man are you, they're asking, that even some fucking WOMAN can get the best of you? What happened to your pimp hand?
Not my point in the slightest. My point is that the guy who originally pointed that out said it as though women who abuse or rape men are somehow getting off because "the system" likes women better than men; like they're all a bunch of straw feminists who let their sister women off the hook because their victims deserved it. Really what's going on is that women aren't taken seriously, and while this means they're often not convicted of violent crimes against men, it's also the reason for just about everything that creates a double standard that favors men. In other words, it's part of the entire problem. It's one of the things that has to go away if we're going to make any progress on the issue of womens' rights.Father Time said:Oh I see so men get raped and not taken seriously. Women are portrayed as being weak. Men are so getting the better end of this deal.chowderface said:I'll give you one. Some guy on the front page mentioned that woman-on-man abuse or rape is drastically underreported, and when it is reported it's usually laughed out. That only sounds like it favors women because of context.Da Orky Man said:In what way? I keep on being passed over for jobs because a woman applied too.GabbleDabble said:This is ridiculious. Women are still oppressed and men are still the oppresors.
What that really says is that women are weak. Pathetic. Worthless. What kind of a man are you, they're asking, that even some fucking WOMAN can get the best of you? What happened to your pimp hand?
you're right on the money. and there's a good reason for it: if a woman stands up and yells 'he raped me!' then you're going to get half your fucking country in a lynch mob. if a guy says 'SHE raped ME!' and the newspapers will ignore it because 'Local man cant fight of woman.' doesnt sell as well.TimeLord said:Women fought for equality for 50+ years. And yet a women still gets priority over a child in a devorce. Domestic abuse by women on men is nowhere near as publicised as domestic abuse of women by men. Also, as you say, when was the last time a newspaper published a story of a woman raping a man? Never.
I'm not saying men are a repressed minority or any of that nonsense, but..... yeah, the equality thing may have gone a little far in one direction instead of stopping where it should of.
Disclaimer: Yes, of course, without stats, I can't back any of that up. I'm not being sexist or anything, I'm just writing the truth of my opinion. But the very fact I feel I should put a disclaimer on this post speaks volumes really.