Silicon Knights President: "Gameplay Isn't Everything"

murphy7801

New member
Apr 12, 2009
1,246
0
0
Fumbles said:
Mythos1092 said:
I like games that have good stories and things like that. When the creators sacrifice fun gameplay for a good story, they become idiots. That's all there is to it. Shiny graphics and a great story are all good, but if the gameplay isn't fun then it's a terrible game.
I agree and Disagree. Most people did not like MGS4 because they "Did not Get it."... Well I'm sorry that your Iq level is 75 and you need your shiny colors and fun "games". A good story is just that...a good story. I actually liked Xenosaga, because of its story, even though there was little to no gameplay.
mgs 4 is a rubbish game but your probably a fan so what say wont matter.
 

letsnoobtehpwns

New member
Dec 28, 2008
1,628
0
0
AHAHAHAHA!!!! THE GUY WHO MADE TOO HUMAN IS SAYS THAT GAMEPLAY ISN'T EVERYTHING!!! And he wonders why Too Human failed! I can't stop laughing!
 

murphy7801

New member
Apr 12, 2009
1,246
0
0
The Inconsistant Cookie said:
*BOOP BOOP PRENTENTIOUS METER AT CRITICAL LEVEL!*
I believe this is one of the first signs of gaming apocylpse; when someone sacrifices the core elements of a game for an artistic message. He really is the gaming equivilent of Jackson Pollock, a true follower of the "this is art, and if you don't like it you're an uncultured moron" crowd, and this man is beggining to turn. I mean, first this and the next thing you know, companies will attempt to flog this off as a game http://peculiarvelocity.files.wordpress.com/2009/02/painting_jackson_pollock.jpg.
indeed there's alot shit art there there's alot art films and just like normally movies alot of them are bad there just catering for a different audience. Deus EX is art!
 

Fumbles

New member
Apr 15, 2009
256
0
0
murphy7801 said:
Fumbles said:
Mythos1092 said:
I like games that have good stories and things like that. When the creators sacrifice fun gameplay for a good story, they become idiots. That's all there is to it. Shiny graphics and a great story are all good, but if the gameplay isn't fun then it's a terrible game.
I agree and Disagree. Most people did not like MGS4 because they "Did not Get it."... Well I'm sorry that your Iq level is 75 and you need your shiny colors and fun "games". A good story is just that...a good story. I actually liked Xenosaga, because of its story, even though there was little to no gameplay.
mgs 4 is a rubbish game but your probably a fan so what say wont matter.
I can actually see that mentality. Its like Michael Bay, If you walk into a Bay film and expect a master piece, then you are a fool. Likewise if you got MGS4 for the gameplay, then you are a fool. Kojima wanted to "finish his story" which is what he did. But the gameplay was a little bit short.
 

murphy7801

New member
Apr 12, 2009
1,246
0
0
letsnoobtehpwns said:
AHAHAHAHA!!!! THE GUY WHO MADE TOO HUMAN IS SAYS THAT GAMEPLAY ISN'T EVERYTHING!!! And he wonders why Too Human failed! I can't stop laughing!
maybe he's trying to pull a get out of jail free card for that monstrosity he made by saying you just don't get because your all thick.
 

V1C3M4N

New member
Nov 28, 2008
76
0
0
People who make good games, like games. People who make goods cars, like cars. A company owned by a person or persons that have a passion for the products and/or services they provide is a good, honest company.

A company owned by a person or persons interested only in making money, without any regard to the integrity and quality of the products or services they provide is a bad company.

Good games are made by good designers, good programmers, good producers, storytellers, artists and everyone else. Bad games are when the previously mentioned participants are restricted by a team of dedicated accountants, with the sigle track mind of getting paid at the expence of quality goods.

Denis Dyack, are you a games designer or an pencil pusher?
 

murphy7801

New member
Apr 12, 2009
1,246
0
0
Fumbles said:
murphy7801 said:
Fumbles said:
Mythos1092 said:
I like games that have good stories and things like that. When the creators sacrifice fun gameplay for a good story, they become idiots. That's all there is to it. Shiny graphics and a great story are all good, but if the gameplay isn't fun then it's a terrible game.
I agree and Disagree. Most people did not like MGS4 because they "Did not Get it."... Well I'm sorry that your Iq level is 75 and you need your shiny colors and fun "games". A good story is just that...a good story. I actually liked Xenosaga, because of its story, even though there was little to no gameplay.
mgs 4 is a rubbish game but your probably a fan so what say wont matter.
I can actually see that mentality. Its like Michael Bay, If you walk into a Bay film and expect a master piece, then you are a fool. Likewise if you got MGS4 for the gameplay, then you are a fool. Kojima wanted to "finish his story" which is what he did. But the gameplay was a little bit short.
Its a film with bits game with in between basically making it a bad game or a non game (also the game play bits were not great).
 

murphy7801

New member
Apr 12, 2009
1,246
0
0
V1C3M4N said:
People who make good games, like games. People who make goods cars, like cars. A company owned by a person or persons that have a passion for the products and/or services they provide is a good, honest company.

A company owned by a person or persons interested only in making money, without any regard to the integrity and quality of the products or services they provide is a bad company.

Good games are made by good designers, good programmers, good producers, storytellers, artists and everyone else. Bad games are when the previously mentioned participants are restricted by a team of dedicated accountants, with the sigle track mind of getting paid at the expence of quality goods.

Denis Dyack, are you a games designer or an pencil pusher?
A company owned by a monkey in a suit
 

yourbeliefs

Bored at Work
Jan 30, 2009
781
0
0
Gameplay isn't EVERYTHING, but it's really the most important thing. Gameplay that is lacking can be compensated for by a great story or immersion or incredible graphics and such, but its a much harder sell, and its easier to have great gameplay compensate for the other things I listed. That's why games like Halo, Gears of War, God of War, Quake, and to some extent casual/PopCap games do better than games like Psychonauts, No More Heroes, Beyond Good and Evil, and essentially the whole adventure game genre. If you want to focus more on presentation than gameplay, fair enough, but you'd better work hard to make all your other pieces compensate for it. I never played Too Human, but from what I can tell, SK did NOT do a good job of compensating for bad gameplay. It did a very good job with Eternal Darkness, which really exactly wow me in terms of gameplay but sucked me in about 5 minutes after I started playing it.
 

Zimbum

New member
Jul 15, 2009
92
0
0
Umm... if gameplay WASN'T everything... nobody would play games like mario with all teh crappy graphics. No gamer cares about architecture and crap. EDIT: Alright, sorry, I take that back.
 

murphy7801

New member
Apr 12, 2009
1,246
0
0
Zimbum said:
Umm... if gameplay WASN'T everything... nobody would play games like mario with all teh crappy graphics. No gamer cares about architecture and crap.
I'm Gamer I like architecture I don't go to games for nice architecture I go to buildings saying that mass effect had some cool architecture (also alot bland stuff as well).
 

Coldsnap

New member
Oct 24, 2008
95
0
0
I think his argument makes sense if you're talking about trying to make an "art" game. Music, story and all the other elements gain more importance in comparison to gameplay to where they need to come together as a whole.

This doesn't make a game good though, take Tetris as an example. A game that just about everybody is familiar with; no story or other memorable bits, just gameplay.

I think gameplay is the most important part though. A game with great and interesting gameplay can compensate for lacking in other areas, but this probably won't work the other way around.
 

lacktheknack

Je suis joined jewels.
Jan 19, 2009
19,316
0
0
Well, no one will observe your art in games if it's too frustrating and boring to view.
 

Zimbum

New member
Jul 15, 2009
92
0
0
Games are still games if the scenery sucks. Games aren't games if there is no gameplay.
 

Fumbles

New member
Apr 15, 2009
256
0
0
murphy7801 said:
Zimbum said:
Umm... if gameplay WASN'T everything... nobody would play games like mario with all teh crappy graphics. No gamer cares about architecture and crap.
I'm Gamer I like architecture I don't go to games for nice architecture I go to buildings saying that mass effect had some cool architecture (also alot bland stuff as well).
The architecture in Assassains Creed was accurate and awesome.
 

Zimbum

New member
Jul 15, 2009
92
0
0
Games are still game if the scenery sucks. Games aren't games if there is no gameplay.
 

lacktheknack

Je suis joined jewels.
Jan 19, 2009
19,316
0
0
Zimbum said:
Umm... if gameplay WASN'T everything... nobody would play games like mario with all teh crappy graphics. No gamer cares about architecture and crap.
Actually, some do. Don't make generalizations.