I'm glad this was kinda a joke thread. I'm SUPER sensitive to the SJW agenda, but Jim did a good job expressing himself. I've seen where these ideas go; the threads of logic never end in a positive place. However, Jim did a great job expressing where they could go, or why there was a real problem. There was no made up boogieman to crush, it was just disappointment at where we could have gone instead of where we are now.
I've seen enough from Jim to think that he probably is in the SJW camp stronger than I'd like, but as long as he keeps expressing himself as I've seen, I'm perfectly happy with it. Problematic SJWs are progressive for progressives sake, and ignore end goals to the point of being regressive. Jim is a real progressive, and is pushing for a realistic possibility of progress.
That ended up being word-salad. The short of it is Jim hasn't turned his ideology up to eleven, and is able to express his position in a logical and well-mannered fashion.
I've seen enough from Jim to think that he probably is in the SJW camp stronger than I'd like, but as long as he keeps expressing himself as I've seen, I'm perfectly happy with it. Problematic SJWs are progressive for progressives sake, and ignore end goals to the point of being regressive. Jim is a real progressive, and is pushing for a realistic possibility of progress.
That ended up being word-salad. The short of it is Jim hasn't turned his ideology up to eleven, and is able to express his position in a logical and well-mannered fashion.