Awesomeness said:
It is true that not every war is religiously based, but as you said the really "popular" and big ones are, but even in other's although they are mainly about other things there are some religious motivations behind them. For example afghanistan.
But it just seems wrong to say that an atheist is more likely to be emotionless, or less empathetic than some one who does follow a religious faith or belief, why do you think all the suicide bombers kill themeselves and everyone around them? Is it because they don't believe in a higher power? No, it's because they believe in their god so strongly that they have no empathy to any other religion.
But hey that's just me, as an atheist I am biased to my way of thinking just as religious people are biased to theirs and there will never be someone who can take a purely ojective look at all this. Except maybe them agnostics, bloody fence sitters.
I wasn't disagreeing with you on the
some wars and violent incidents are caused by people's faith in their religion, and that assuming that just because someone is non religious is not empathetic is wrong, and I suppose you are right on the some wars being for multiple reasons including religion as one of them
but!... I'm now midly upset because of what you said about Agnostics you meanie :-(
Just because were not 100% certain doesn't mean were on the fence!... It just means were not entirely on either side of the ground!.. Plenty of us are sort of hanging off the side!
Also, I'm pretty sure that the Afganistan one would count as a popular war as it's current and is often seen in the news...
...Wait, can I just claim that everything everyone else says about religion is biased and wrong because they're not Agnostic while everything I say is unbiased and true because I am Agnostic? Sweeeeet. MY OPINION IS THE ONLY VALID ONE NOW!