I always thought fanboys were hilarious, until I saw them defending Sony for having shit security systems.
Why can't it be both the hackers' AND Sony's fault?
Why can't it be both the hackers' AND Sony's fault?
Because, of course, it's all just one group. Hey look, they made it easier for us to hate them! Looks like their consolidation is now working against them. Those hackers aren't so smart after all...Detective Prince said:Thank GOD it's my old email and password on PSN and that I never bought any games off there. God hackers want us to sympathise with their cause and then pull shit like this. >.> I seriously hate hackers.
doesn't change the fact the who ever did i still anonymous as in we don't have a clue who did it so group or verb doesn't matterMoriarty said:the point is:tony2077 said:when someone is anonymous it mean you don't know them so is there really a difference at this pointMoriarty said:Well you have to make a difference between the verb and the group. Not everyone who hides their identity visits /b and not everyone who's a regular on /b is in Anonymous.tony2077 said:who ever did it is still anonymous so doesn't really change who your blaming it could be the group or some other nobodyMoriarty said:nah look at the tread. Anyone who origninally blamed anonymous still does because all hackers are the same.Oscar90 said:Anyone who originally blamed anonymous probably feels pretty stupid right about now.
Why would a political activist group try to steal user data and credit card info? well duh because they're hackers
http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/anonymous is not the same as http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anonymous_%28group%29 simple enough?
Well balls, I was going to ignore you up until this post, but it needs to be said.erbkaiser said:But without the ability to run custom code AND access the PSN, they would never have been able to try. Hotz may not be the perpetrator here, but he is at least an enabler. Without his "mischief" whoever is behind this attack would never have been able to get whatever data they now got. Sony had good reasons to not allow custom code on the PSN, as this debacle shows without a doubt.tcurt said:The root key alone would not allow you to come anywhere close to being able to do something like this. It's Sony's net code that the hackers had to breach, not anything held internally within a specific PS3, and it obviously wasn't all that difficult.
Don't get me wrong, I am very angry at Sony for apparently running a weak security (if any) inside the PSN itself, but as long as they were able to control the access there was no risk. Thanks to Geohotz and the other crackers who breached open the PS3 the door was open for actual attacks, and I do hold them responsible for that.
same hereMagenera said:Now to remember what my password was.tony2077 said:if you don't have a credit card on there other then changing your password there is nothing to worry aboutMagenera said:So how screwed am I if I do my payment through PSN cash card from like 7 eleven? I mean I only bought one card.
tony2077 said:doesn't change the fact the who ever did i still anonymous as in we don't have a clue who did it so group or verb doesn't matterMoriarty said:the point is:tony2077 said:when someone is anonymous it mean you don't know them so is there really a difference at this pointMoriarty said:Well you have to make a difference between the verb and the group. Not everyone who hides their identity visits /b and not everyone who's a regular on /b is in Anonymous.tony2077 said:who ever did it is still anonymous so doesn't really change who your blaming it could be the group or some other nobodyMoriarty said:nah look at the tread. Anyone who origninally blamed anonymous still does because all hackers are the same.Oscar90 said:Anyone who originally blamed anonymous probably feels pretty stupid right about now.
Why would a political activist group try to steal user data and credit card info? well duh because they're hackers
http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/anonymous is not the same as http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anonymous_%28group%29 simple enough?