Come on, Sony cares about keeping out hackers/jailbreakers/whatever, hell they designed their own system on the premise that it was beyond the realms of imagination that anyone who didn't work for Sony could access the Network. But you seem to be saying that Sony have made themselves look even more incompetent than they actually are to spite some unknown entity (cutting off their nose to spite their face).Pyrokinesis said:It is a bloody song and dance and quite frankly Sony is good at it. All it takes is one specially worded excerpt of vauge words and hidden potentials to make everyone jump off the deep end and start blaming Anon. When are they gona admit that the data was "capable" of being stolen but was not downloaded. Never, that would make their case look weak. They have to paint Anon as "malicious hackers" and they did it well without saying a word. Well done sony, And well done mindless masses who believe them.killamanhunter said:Let's see the timeline
1st: Sony sues Geohotz and everyone goes against Sony
2nd: Anon attacks Sony and everyone goes against Anon
3rd: Geo drops out and Anon tries one last ditch effort to feel like they mean something in this fight no one likes anyone
4th: PSN goes down everyone hates Sony and Anon
5th PSN stays down and Anons all like "we did nothing bro!" everyone hates Sony
6th: everyone get's their stuff stolen off of PSN and we go back to everyone hates both sides in the fight
point is if we can put music on a compact disc....
I am willing to believe that someone is sitting on a bank of personal data with no idea what to do about it. I would even go so far as to say that probably no one will have their identities stolen or their money stolen. But I am not willing to believe that Sony are playing this game on a level higher than Anonymous, the hacker and the 'masses'.
More likely is this 'outside company' they hired told them "Even though the chances of your customers being at risk are slim, even though it looks bad, you still have to warn them of the risk because it is the law". Then Sony procrastinated, paid its own lawyers $500,000 to look into it, and finally made this update.