Yes, understanding what you're talking about is totally irrelevant.Kadoodle said:Being a security expert is irrelevant. Hotz proved that the ps3 could be hacked. Hackers had pretty much given up till he hacked it. There is a huge likelyhood that other hackers caught on and started tapping wells elsewhere. Even so, he started it. He lit the cigarette near the puddle of gasoline. It's starting to ignite; its up to sony to put it out.pokepuke said:Because you're a security expert and not a random dude on the internets.Kadoodle said:It was secure and stable until Hotz decided to stick his dick into the mechanism. Fucker makes me mad.
Seriously, isn't there some part of your mind that pauses for a moment and considers "hey, I have zero understanding of what's going on here; perhaps I shouldn't start making blanket statements as if they're fact?". I guess not.
Look, I try to be as polite as I can on the internet, but I have no other way to express this.
Stop. Making. Shit. Up.
Jailbreaking the PS3 did not suddenly make PSN insecure. Hacking a PS3 is not nearly the same as hacking PSN. Even if we live in some Alice-through-the-looking-glass looney dimension, and the PS3 jailbreak that Geohot piggy-backed off did somehow magically enable access to the PSN database, all that would prove is that Sony has some amazingly incompetent system architects and/or network engineers. The fact this could happen means the network was never secure, irrespective of Geohot's meddling with a client-side device.
The 360 has been subjected to numerous piracy-enabling hacks for most of its life, but you don't see anyone lifting XBL's entire user database. E-tailers like Amazon have to deal with their servers being connected to millions of completely open systems, but they never lost the entirety of their customer records.