Sony Patents a Way to Sabotage Used Game Market

Recommended Videos

Mycroft Holmes

New member
Sep 26, 2011
850
0
0
Scars Unseen said:
This is a pretty blatant violation of first sale doctrine. I'm sure the US courts won't do anything about it because fuck consumer rights, but I imagine it won't fly to well over on the other side of the Atlantic.
No it isn't. Read the EULA some time. You don't buy videogames, you are merely renting them indefinitely for(usually) a one time fee. You can't rent a car and then sell it any more than you can a videogame. This does not however, apply to most old games from the early 90s and before, but anything from the past 10-15 years is not something you technically own.
 

jthm

New member
Jun 28, 2008
825
0
0
huh. I guess I'd care if my ps3 wasn't gathering dust while the 360 still sees use.
 

Defenestra

New member
Apr 16, 2009
106
0
0
Y'know, I'd dismiss this as just an idea they filed a parent on in case they felt like using it later, and conclude that Sony would never, ever do something so actively hostile to their customers.

I would conclude that, if I had not seen them do something similarly user-hostile not that long ago, through their music wing. Anyone remember that lawsuit they lost over putting rootkits on music CDs? Because I do.
 

Closet Superhero

New member
May 24, 2009
43
0
0
I'm fine with this as a concept. Playing a game is unlike buying a physical good, it's an experience more akin to going to the cinemas, a concert, a theme park, etc. Films, television and books are also moving in this direction.

The problem lies in execution (i.e. being user-friendly) and appropriate pricing. Steam does this well. Sony's track record, however, does not bode well. If they were to implement this without dramatically improving their online service and reducing the prices of games, they could fall out of the console race completely.
 

disgruntledgamer

New member
Mar 6, 2012
903
0
0
Well I just won't buy a PS 4 than. That simple, 90% of the games I buy are new anyway but if they're going to be complete dicks I'll just take my business else where.
 

disgruntledgamer

New member
Mar 6, 2012
903
0
0
Mycroft Holmes said:
Scars Unseen said:
This is a pretty blatant violation of first sale doctrine. I'm sure the US courts won't do anything about it because fuck consumer rights, but I imagine it won't fly to well over on the other side of the Atlantic.
No it isn't. Read the EULA some time. You don't buy videogames, you are merely renting them indefinitely for(usually) a one time fee. You can't rent a car and then sell it any more than you can a videogame. This does not however, apply to most old games from the early 90s and before, but anything from the past 10-15 years is not something you technically own.
Actually I think you need to re-read those laws because yo got them half assed backwards, you OWN the disk and when you sell that disk you sell the license to use it as long as you can no longer use it.
 

Baresark

New member
Dec 19, 2010
3,908
0
0
Just another potentially misguiding attempt to control content. Let them put it on there, I simply won't buy it. It'll be just another reason why PC gaming is light years ahead and way better than any console. That said, I have not really been able to buy a used PC game for a very long time. But we also have a lot more options as PC gamers when it comes to pricing and where we buy games.
 

Platypus540

New member
May 11, 2011
312
0
0
Sony execs, apparently: "HURRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR"

Seriously, how could anyone even remotely think this is a good business strategy? The business lost from lowered franchise recognition and from people flat-out refusing to buy your games can't possibly be outweighed by the increased new game sales. Hell, just patenting the tech was a bad PR move.

Edit: Plus, they'll probably get their pants sued off if they try this.
 

baddab

New member
Mar 7, 2011
1
0
0
Baldr said:
WouldYouKindly said:
Baldr said:
WouldYouKindly said:
I always have this to say; WHY THE FUCK SHOULD YOU GET ANYTHING FROM USED SALES?!

If I sell anything else I own, the original creator doesn't expect to get anything at all out of it. I sell my car, that's all my money. I sell my TV, that's all my money. I sell my house, all my money.

In other words, of course you don't get anything from used sales, games industry. No industry does. What makes you so fucking special?
No other industry has to deal with retailers that market used items over new merchandise and undercut new sales.
The car industry does. Used car lots specifically undercut new sales and I'm pretty sure all the car companies would rather everyone have to buy new cars all the time.

If they want to cripple the used market, then go for a cheaper and more convenient digital distribution service. There's a reason why people use Steam so much, it's just easier than going to a store.
No they don't. You don't see Ford, Toyota, or any of the other major car brands putting used cars on the lots out in front. The used cars are usually in the back or in a separate lot.
Actually you do. I worked for a Ford dealership and we always put the used cars in front and middle with banners advertising them. On the sides the new cars went with nothing more than the window stickers. It is up to the seller how to arrange their products. It is not mandated by the manufactures.
 

Abomination

New member
Dec 17, 2012
2,939
0
0
Why do corporations think wasting money fighting tooth and nail against consumer culture will end well for them?

EMBRACE used saled, get involved in the process, make it EASIER for people to engage in used sales - they will make more money. This might even cut out the middlemen resulting in increased profits for producers and (potentially) savings for consumers.

Steam has cut out the middle-men. It doesn't need to provide used games because it has sales that are effectively the same thing for the consumer. Steam sees all of the revenue from those sales. Sure it would be -nice- to be able to sell a Steam copy of a game but considering how many I picked up for $5 I won't lose any sleep over it.

Essentially: If Sony wants to go ahead with this they better drop prices of new games by $20 across the board. But we know they won't do that.
 

Korolev

No Time Like the Present
Jul 4, 2008
1,852
0
0
Well, I'm not surprised in the slightest. I think we all saw this coming. I don't know if they'd implement it right away, but I always knew they were considering these sorts of devices.

It will be circumvented within a week, I'm sure.

As for the morality of creating these devices - I wouldn't say it's "evil" but it is anti-consumer. They are, indirectly, trying to stop people from selling the games they own, and that isn't right.
 

Jamous

New member
Apr 14, 2009
1,939
0
0
So that could spell the end of bringing a game to a party or anything similar. Friend wants to bring a multiplayer game to your house? NOPE. Fuck's sake Sony. I try so hard to be on Playstation's side. >_<
 

Reyold

New member
Jun 18, 2012
353
0
0
Mortis Nuncius said:
So, unlike the many that have done so already, I'm choosing to not jump the gun and make wild accusations in the process, but to withhold my judgment until after I've heard what Sony has planned for the patents (which hasn't even been made official yet). For all we know, they could be hoping to obtain the patent to prevent other companies from using that sort of technology with malicious intent. I'm not saying that it is their plan, so please don't tell me I'm wrong for my speculations.

[HEADING=2]Let's not point fingers, mkay?[/HEADING]
Not jumping the gun is generally the best course of action... but still, you have to wonder....

All I can say is that I hope Sony isn't dumb enough to use it.
Abomination said:
Essentially: If Sony wants to go ahead with this they better drop prices of new games by $20 across the board. But we know they won't do that.
All because of greed, greed, greed, amirite? Your idea would probably work, but because it won't make as MUCH money as they would otherwise, it ain't gonna happen.

Really, if you ask me, it all comes down to priorities: should they go through with this, it will clearly show that they care more about making money NOW than they do customer service and loyalty (which would be a more reliable way of securing cash flow than trying to squeeze it out their consumers). If they want people's money, they should give customers good reasons to give it to them.
 

Vault101

I'm in your mind fuzz
Sep 26, 2010
18,855
15
43
fuck that shit....

and the sad thing is there would still be plenty of fanboys to buy the PS4, I bought a pS3 this gen because it seemed like the better option for me, now whats the point of a console?
 

Vigormortis

New member
Nov 21, 2007
4,531
0
0
Matt K said:
Um, could you guys at least try to use the appropriate terms in your article? Sony did not patent this, they simply filed a patent application, which anyone can do on absolutely anything. Does not mean that Sony will get a patent on this (although they may, it'll be a few years at the least before there's any result).
You'd be surprised how quickly a patent can be issued. At least, here in the US. Sometimes in a short a time as a few months after application.

And, it's actually very likely they will be granted said patent. Given Microsoft patenting a "big brother"-esque monitoring system for streaming media and Apple patenting a God-damned geometric shape (rectangle with rounded corners), a green-lit patent on disc-locking technology isn't too far-fetched.
 

Souplex

Souplex Killsplosion Awesomegasm
Jul 29, 2008
10,308
0
0
Fappy said:
If they don't have some plan for it I have to wonder why they spent the money to develop it in the first place. Though, I agree that they aren't likely dumb enough to utilize this for the PS4.
I'm not so sure Sony can afford to move forward with the PS4 in the first place. They're going off a financial cliff pretty fast, and without any brakes.
 

spartan231490

New member
Jan 14, 2010
5,184
0
0
They wouldn't have spent the money on developing and patenting this if they weren't going to use it. Wake up people, they're putting it in the PS4.
 

poiuppx

New member
Nov 17, 2009
673
0
0
I have often said, especially in private, that this sort of technology is entirely feasible, easily implemented, and would mean the death of whichever company employed it first. Nintendo and Microsoft, if Sony employed this, would have fodder to use to lure former Sony users over en masse; Sony does not care about you, wants to violate first sale doctrines with an end run, wants to drive game stores to extinction, etc. They'll not just grab market share, they'll grab a lot of good will from companies like GameStop who would likely 'accidentally' undership Sony products or constantly move them to the rear of the store, etc. Remember, for all the ills associated with them, Sony NEEDS GameStop to move physical merchandise. They have a higher market penetration than anything else in terms of brick-&-mortar locations. Which means that for physical disc sales done in person, as well as moving the console itself- which is something of a concern, one would think -you need GameStop on board. And if you make negating used sales a cornerstone? No, they won't be on board. Not even close.

tl;dr: The only way Sony uses this technology is if they are suicidal or utterly delusional to the point they think they can just skip that minor in-person element of video game sales entirely.