A gimmick is something that is done just to be done, to attract attention but doesn't really add anything to the experience, for example 3D in Avatar wasn't a gimmick, it added a lot to the experience, 3D in Clash of the Titans was a gimmick, if anything it detracted from the movie.Ravek said:Headaches are bad, of course. But I can't agree with calling it a gimmick. I would hate not having stereoscopic 3D vision in my day to day life, so how could I consider 3D vision in games a gimmick?tkioz said:Glasses are 90% of the reason I detest 3D, the other 10% is split up between the headache it gives me, it's general gimickness (sp?), and several other minor issues.
I don't see how this is true. But I don't think Sony is making a "douche like statement" here, they are just being massive hypocrites and that bothers people. For example, I recall them taking multiple stabs at Microsoft's kinect during E3, pointing out how a controller with buttons is an important part of the hardcore gaming experience. Now they want Nintendo to stop promoting the fact that their 3D does not require those annoying glasses.Korten12 said:funny thing is that if Nintendo said any douche like statement no one who have any problem.
If plenty of games don't use the tech then why waste money on it. I say just forget 3D and wait for actual virtual reality.Onyx Oblivion said:3D is a fad.
But the 3DS is not going to be. You don't need any special equipment, and there'll be plenty of 3DS games that likely won't use the 3D tech.
So then why are we still seeing just glasses. If there is so many of us who already wear glasses why aren't we seeing freaking clips? That is all we need fer crying out loud. They make them with sunglass lenses so we don't have to wear sunglasses over our daily glasses.Susan Arendt said:Damn straight. Sony's glasses are light and even attractive, but they still suck if you wear normal glasses, too. That's not their fault, that's just how it is. Glasses over glasses ain't comfy, no matter how nice each pair is.buy teh haloz said:I wear glasses, but I have to wear the 3D glasses on top of my regular glasses. It's so fucking uncomfortable.Gamegodtre said:since i wear actual glasses the 3D glasses don't fit me can i get 3D goggles?
Yeah, what gives Nintendo the right to point out that their technology doesn't have glasses that can cause headaches and darken the over all picture for thousands less for the TV+glasses could possibly cost!John Funk said:Snip
At least the 3DS includes some improved graphics, a new joystick that looks like it has been designed to avoid all the troubles the PSP had with its joystick, a huge number of launch titles, and the ability to change the depth of field or out right turn it off with a simple slider on the side of the system.OneBig Man said:If plenty of games don't use the tech then why waste money on it. I say just forget 3D and wait for actual virtual reality.Onyx Oblivion said:3D is a fad.
But the 3DS is not going to be. You don't need any special equipment, and there'll be plenty of 3DS games that likely won't use the 3D tech.
Nintendo, those quick-scoping bastards!John Funk said:Both companies should be presenting a united front in the promotion of 3D gaming, not sniping at each others' technology.