i seriously i mean seriously doubt this bill is going to pass, but even if it does, thats just 1 more state i'm glad i don't live in
South Carolina Senator Wants Swearing Outlawed
- Thread starter Andy Chalk
- Start date
I would have thought Robert Byrd (who is ancient and struggles to stay awake while talking) would have tried this disaster of a Bill out. But... surprise!
This is dumb.
This is dumb.
Exactly. Extreme Liberalism and Extreme conservatism are different ways to the same end result.Korhal said:Sure, there are crazy moralists on the conservative side of the spectrum. But one thing you have to remember: There are crazies on both sides of the political spectrum. The other side of the spectrum legislates its own morality too... Americans with Disabilities Act, the EPA... all just as crazy, and stupid...
"That sounds like the Alliance... Unite all the planets under one rule, so that everybody can be interfered with or ignored equally." Brownie points to those who know where that one is from
Not only that, but in some places in the US it is technically illegal to have sex in any position other than missionary. I'm not even fucking kidding. One of my friends read it in an old, old law book she found. I don't know if the law is still in effect; I can't find any recent information because it is one of those obscure laws that no one really knows about, but the point is that it exists/existed at one time. Just imagine the police trying to enforce that one...cleverlymadeup said:
"Hello citizen, we are performing a random door-to-door check to make sure that you and your wife aren't trying any unlawful sexual positions..."
It won't. Fat chance man. This law has as much chance of passing as the Senator does of passing the hope diamond through his bowels. That, and even if by a miracle it would get passed, how on earth do you enforce that without resorting to totalitarian means?Jharry5 said:
he was arrested a few times, along with Lenny Bruce but each time he got off on the charges, his sketch for the 7 words went to the surpreme court and he wonorannis62 said:
actually it's called intelligent design and they keep trying to push for it but it's been rejected in court as religion. it's creationism but inside of "god doing it" it's some "intelligent creator" http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intelligent_design
as for abstinence only here's a nice link on it http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abstinence-only_sex_education#Rise_in_the_U.S.
sure the 2 other ppl you might know don't have it taught in their school but there are places that both are taught, funnily enough the latter one coincides with the areas with the highest teen pregnancy rates
What a darn motherfather. Get the funk out of America.
Sorry....on a more serious note, there is no way in hell this can ever pass, it violates the U.S constitutional right of free speech. But I'm sure that has been expressed by now, three pages in.
I'm amazed this man made it so far without knowing what the U.S constitution stood for or the first amendment. Or that the constitution could not be violated. Although if looked back on the Bush Administration, I can see why he thinks accomplishing this as possible.
Sorry....on a more serious note, there is no way in hell this can ever pass, it violates the U.S constitutional right of free speech. But I'm sure that has been expressed by now, three pages in.
I'm amazed this man made it so far without knowing what the U.S constitution stood for or the first amendment. Or that the constitution could not be violated. Although if looked back on the Bush Administration, I can see why he thinks accomplishing this as possible.
The same way the incumbant president got the job while not knowing thing-one about the whole Constitution that he swore to defend and uphold.Jumplion said:
The American electorate has a terrible tendancy to collective moronism, despite their individualistic dogma.
-- Steve