Beltom1066 said:
*major snippage*
Not all of us under 25's are how you think. Some of us can actually tell the difference between "their" and "they're" and have an IQ over 50. Stereotyping young people as neanderthalic retards is just as much part of the problem, since that is what the developers who make "the shite that has become gaming" thing when they make these games. Have you ever thought that some of us are intelligent and we cringe at what others in our generation do? Stop being bigoted towards people younger than you and realize that idiocy and intelligence are spread evenly over the age spectrum, and not clustered at the bottom like you seem to believe.
Yeah yeah, I know I'm generalising, but please, by all means, show me where gaming has has advanced from the hobby of the intelligencia, to the entertainment of the mass idiocy to what, exactly?
When I was growing up (and admittedly, home computers were of the AT or XT variety, and you could choose between a green and black, white and black or orange and black 10" monitor), games were made by the ultra-intelligent for the ultra-intelligent (hence games like paranoia, zork, etc).
Over the last 20+ years, I've been witness to gaming becoming less the realm of the intelligent nerd and morphing into the pass-time of the retard stereotypical american fratboy. The games of today require nowhere near the intelligence, or even the problem solving or logic abilities of the games I grew up with, which where, to be honest, the origins of gaming as it is today.
When I look at the latest retread of an fps game, I see nothing but a cheesy remake of something I've already played, just less original and of far less quality.
All that said, show me how Fallout 3, despite (and honestly in spite of) its graphical updates, is better than the old SSI game Pools of Radience (which, in my less than humble opinion, had a far superior story and gameplay). Please, I beg you, show me a game released in the last 10 years that had a better plot or execution than SSI's classic.