Indiana Jones and the Staff of Kings for the Wii. GOD why was I so gullible!? I love you Indy, but your Wii game is craptastic.
fanboyicame said:So being average to mediocre equals the worst game ever made? I want your gaming track record because obviously you've never had to play through a really terrible game.InnerRebellion said:Half Life 2. I found it extremely bland in gameplay, and the story was meh.
Quoted for truth!Compatriot Block said:Anyone listing titles like Halo, Call of Duty, Dragon Age, etc., I'm in awe of your gaming career.
Really? Those are the WORST you've played? God, you're a bunch of lucky bastards then. Unless saying that is just a way for you to get...naaaah.
You know, I actually agree. The premise of the story was pretty interesting, but it just couldn't keep up. Similarly, the premise of the corrupted versions of ww2 (where the hell did that take place anyway? Last time I checked, the Brandenburg Gate isn't anywhere near Al-Khali), the Crusades, the Roman governor's mansion, and the Babylonian city-thing held tremendous promise, but it never really developed. I actually had to laugh when the crusaders betrayed you for the supposed angelic Lynch, not something I should be doing in a horror game. As for the characters and their powers, were they really that original? Two characters had the exact same equipment (the seer and the protagonist), and the other powers included bullet time and telekinesis. Plus some where just useful in certain places where the story demanded it, like the seer, or the pyro guy's fire protection. That being said, the blood witch and the sniper had some cool powers, if only for the sake of some funny moments.Therumancer said:thethingthatlurks said:Please don't mistake this post for some sort antipathy filled diatribe, I'm genuinely curious about your responses.Therumancer said:I'll actually defend this one, largely because it has redeeming merits in some incredibly good writing, and the ideas at play were not bad, they just lacked on the implementation. I think the problem with the gameplay was that they were testing out an idea to sell cheat codes, where you needed a number from your disc that you would use when you paid in orderthethingthatlurks said:Cliver Barker's Jericho. It's a textbook example of how to not design a game. And before anybody gets any ideas, I bought the game knowing how shitty it would be, but I had thought I would get some amusement from writing a review. Sadly, that didn't happen...
to have a unique code created to unlock the cheats. If you play the game "straight" without playing into the money making gimmick at least part way, your asking for trouble, though admittedly there are ways to get 4 of them (I think) for free, and they should still be on the gamefaqs forum.
At any rate Jericho is one of the few shooters I ever noticed getting an RP board on Gamefaqs (even if it later closed). Even now there is a dedicated fan community that wants a sequel given how it ended on a cliffhanger.
It's not a good game I suppose, but not one I think can be fairly called among the worst of all time. Being very weak in some areas, and very strong in othrs, with a small but dedicated fanbase holding out beyond all apparent hope, I think it pretty much fits the definition of "cult classic".
First, what good writing? Granted, Clive Barker is a professional writer, but the story felt "far out there" for lack of a better phrase. There may be worse stories (eg MW2), but I would hardly call this good. I didn't care much for the characters either, as even though they had distinct personalities, they felt so damn stock and one dimensional. As for the cliffhanger, was it really one? Big bad was (presumably) killed by Lynch, and the surviving protagonists left the Breach.
Second, you said the game had some strong areas. What might those be?
Lastly, I realize everybody has different opinions, but the thread was dealing with the worst game you've [sic] ever played. In my case it's Jericho. Of course it's just my opinion, and had I said InFamous (yes, I consider it a horrible game, but not quite the worst), I would have pissed off other fanboys.
Well, you are correct that the storyline *IS* "Far Out There" and I guess that appeals to some people, and not to others. But then again, that's in keeping with a lot of Mr. Barker's writing which is substantially differant than the movies that have been based off of it. Simply put the whole "first born" concept was a somewhat differant spin on lovecraftian horror, and while not totally original, using superhumans as an opposing force was fairly well done. I think the appeal of the characters isn't so much the personalities which were fairly "stock" for horror and/or military fiction, but the unique spins on some of the powers. For example you had a guy with a fire elemental living in his arm.
The gameplay mechanic of controlling an entire squad in a shooter and jumping between them was decent, but it wasn't implemented well, and as many reviewers have pointed out the combat enviroments were simply far too confined.
As far as the ending goes, you don't know all of who lived and who died, the First Born is not dead, and apparently the water they are in is supposed to be in hell or purgatory, and apparently the sequel is intended to be set on an aircraft carrier playing home to the spirits of six hundred and sixty six dead children or something like that. Clive Barker apparently said how he intended the series to continue, but it's probably not going to happen.
The point here wasn't so much me defending it like it's a personal favorite of mine, because despite being a Clive Barker fan it's not, I was simply pointing out that this game is a cult classic. I think it's mediocre, but good enough where I was hoping to see if it could be improved upon in sequels.
To put things into perspective, at the very beginning of last year (2010) a fansite was launched to try and keep the fanbase alive, and there is still a 200+ message thread about it going on in the Gamefaqs 360 forum (last time I checked). This game managed to achieve a fanbase, even if it's not a large one.
http://www.jerichosquad.com/
I've never played half life 2. All i was saying is that if the worst game he's ever played he considered average then he is damn lucky.ICanBreakTheseCuffs said:fanboyicame said:So being average to mediocre equals the worst game ever made? I want your gaming track record because obviously you've never had to play through a really terrible game.InnerRebellion said:Half Life 2. I found it extremely bland in gameplay, and the story was meh.
the thread is worst game you've played. Not worst game ever
yeah same here waste of a christmas wishMikailCaboose said:Probably Shadow the Hedgehog. And to think that I actually wanted that game...
I went to Wal-Mart at midnight to get it. A buddy of mine wanted to play it, and all I knew was what he had told me. He said it was supposed to be better than Gun and Red Dead Revolver. Two games that I absolutely loved.satokenji said:Fuckin Damnation. Can't believe i bought that game. hated it