caz105 said:
HT_Black said:
Aww the wittle valve fanboy doesn't comprehend the story and puzzles.
Seriously dude this is all flamebait, and before you call me a "nintentard" as you put it I'll have you know I'm a PS3 fanboy.
I can't believe your entire review of the storyline was accusing nintendo of obscure plot lines and weird sexual preferences, In fact I think I would get a better PS3 review from the screaming 12 year old portion of Halo 3's fanbase. Just admit it was over your head and leave it at that.
Aren't you cute? But seriously, I think you're lost. God of War is in the next building-- it's about your speed.
That is to say, agressive, judgemental, overly defensive, spoiling for a fight, not clever enough to look at my profile, and not discerning enough to go for
Among Thieves.
You fanboy-fu is weak.
ma55ter_fett said:
I would love to comment on your review but I gave up after five paragraphs.
So I will generalize it by saying only this...
It sucks.
Each to his own-- I'd make a comment about your statement, except you used 'generalize; quite creatively there: I've never seen it used that way in any dictionary.
teisjm said:
Here's what i get from your review
The bad parts.
Theres several things that suffer udner the fact that you haven't played through the game. Sometimes it's like reading a movie review based solely on the trailer. Seriously, dislike a game as much as you want, critisism is always better than dazed fanboys, but calling a review of a game you've only played about 15% a feview is as big a lie as the ones you attack the professinals for telling.
Actually, as fate would have it, I made it through 70% of the game-- I suppose I can be thankful that it seemed short. Also, I'd reccommend practicing more before you touch-type. Want to know something cool? I'm typing this with my eyes closed.
And yes, by the way-- He
is twelve-- but I'm pretty sure they pull an
Ocarina on us and shave five years of his lifespan right around the second dungeon. And regardless-- 17 is
still too young.
Graustein said:
Despicable characters, a pointless and disengaging story, broken controls, uninteresting combat, annoying puzzles, bad character design, and an absolutely infuriating score make The Legend of Zelda: The Twilight Princess one of the worst things you can waste money on (just above a thumbscrew and just below a blowjob from a starving coyote).
Let's see...
Despicable characters? Well, Midna can be annoying, although I personally liked her. The kids were annoying, but then they were meant to be. Colin is awesome, as is Zant. Zelda, I found to be far too passive in this game, right up until the end. I enjoyed the side-story with Ilia and found Renado to be incredibly awesome. Telma, I found pretty annoying with her thinly-veiled advances.
A pointless and disengaging story? Since you didn't even finish the game, one wonders how you know how the story goes. I had no problems following it, personally, but then again I've played Zelda before.
Broken controls? I played the Gamecube version, but it had the best controls of any Zelda game I've ever played. And the Zelda games in general definitely compare favourably to the action-adventure-whateverthehellthisgenreis games that I've played. The lack of a jump button never annoyed me, because the dungeons and such are actually designed with the inability to jump on the spot in mind. You jump when you need to, and at no other time; considering that Zelda's not really a platformer, I don't see the problem here.
Uninteresting Combat? Well, that's entirely subjective. I personally loved it, especially fights against bosses, Dark Nuts and Dinalfos. Except you didn't get to the latter two, did you?
Annoying Puzzles? I liked them. But then I never ended up "angrily stalking the room for 45 minutes looking for the easily-missed last door". Not to mention I paid attention to the in-game hints, was fairly meticulous and used the map.
Bad character design? Isn't this a reiteration of your first point? Were they really so banal as to force you to repeat yourself twice?
Infuriating Score? I'm afraid you are beyond help here.
Finally: Paedophilic bestiality? For one, Link is 17. For another, there is nothing sexual between Midna and Link, implied or otherwise. Midna pats Link, rides him like a horse (get that? A horse. Not anything else), twists his ear and so forth because she starts off as, frankly, a vindictive ***** who loves to bend others to her will, which is pretty obvious from her first appearance (Her condescending tone and impish laugh were pretty clear).
See above, with maybe a few extra wuips thrown in. Aslo, about the whole "uninteresting characters" thing? Anyone with half a brain in their heads should be able to get you interested in them right off the bat. Moreover, I don't know if you caught this, but I was playing this game ON THE WII.
Archer147 said:
blue_guy said:
HT_Black said:
THE LEGEND OF ZELDA: TWILIGHT PRINCESS
I can now say that The Legend of Zelda: Twilight Princess now holds a special place in my heart...
As the worst piece of crap I've ever played.
Finally, some one with some sense!
Anyone that disagrees is a fanboy or a troll.
EDIT: You shouldn't have to play through to the end, if after 5 hours the game is still boring as fuck then it doesn't deserve a chance.
You're likening someone who like a certain game with a person who deliberately posts short, annoying, often bewildering messages for the sole purpose of getting a rise out of someone?
My god, you're a fucking idiot.
If the game you've been playing for 5 hours isn't interesting you, YOU'RE PLAYING THE WRONG GAME FOR YOU. If you don't like FPSs,don't play CoD or Halo.
Well said, hater.
bluepilot said:
I do not think that your reveiw was particulary clever or funny.
You are entitled to dislike the game, however a more balanced reveiw, without any references to paedophilic bestiality, would have been more articulate.
They would've also been less
accurate. That'd be a bit like me reviewing
Rapelay and forgetting to mention the whole 'rape' aspect.
Heart of Darkness said:
ma55ter_fett said:
I would love to comment on your review but I gave up after five paragraphs.
So I will generalize it by saying only this...
It sucks.
IMO, you just won this thread. Good job.
OT: Meh, not necessarily a review, more like a rant. I read through it, and while I don't agree with most of it (I liked TP), you are free to your own opinion. Although the stuff about bestiality? You totally missed the point and characterization of Midna. Sorry. Try again.
(Also, take the time to listen to Midna's Lament [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LUXhSvvxmN0]. It's one of the best tracks in the game. It's much better when it's actually played in the game, though.)
See above. Again.
jthm said:
I stopped respecting your opinion about the time you claimed Bioshock wasn't good either, though your comment about having never played a Legend of Zelda game made skeptical of either your age or your credentials as a gamer.
I stopped respecting you right about here. Attacks aren't a good way to open a correspondence. Insert another quarter.
Jeronus said:
I disagree with almost all of your points, but what I found most disturbing of all was the way you treated your own opinion on a game you barely played.
70%. Although nice job on not being offensive there.
First of all, the story is the one of the simplest in all of gaming history. You basically must gather weapons and powerful old relics from dungeons while at the same time defeating the evil inside which will prepare you for the final boss confrontation.
How many of said bosses are mentioned for more than a single level? Dissapearing plot points.
From what you told me, you didn't even make it far enough into the story to get a feel for it.
As near as I can tell, there
was no stroy. There was a plot, to be sure, but anything resembling a story was conspicuously absent.
Secondly, you barely mention the swordplay at all. I can only gather from this that you actually enjoyed it, but enjoyed writing your hateful and ugly "review" so much that you left it out. It is a huge part of the game and some of the best moments occur when Link has a sword and shield in his hand.
It's all there in the review, pal-- I
did like the swordplay.
Finally, you need to realize that your opinion isn't a fact.
Likewise.
You scream liar at other reviewers like it is impossible for anyone else to enjoy this game.
Hey kettle-- you're black!
To be honest, you came across like wannabe, know it all jerk who is commenting on a subject he really doesn't understand.
Et tu.
P.S. It feels like you are trying to imitate Yahtzee but even he realize that other people have different opinions that might be valid.
I eagerly await proof of this.
loremazd said:
Well, I can tell a few things from this review....
You don't know how to ride an animal.
Tell that to the trailhorse and the Apaloosa I keep out back. Sweet home Alabama, buddy.
She's simple riding him like a horse. You also apparently have seen some rather old looking 12 year olds.
No, he looks like a china doll. It say in the game that he is, in fact, 12.
Aside from this the review is pretty much a good assessment of the opening, which I think was terribly flawed. The world they made is beautiful and dynamic, and forcing you to see each section of it first in a bland palette with dull music before it makes it bright is a terrible design decision.
Oh, you magnificent bastard! You gave me an off-handed compliment! Now I can't bear to insult you!
That being said, I still think this was the best Zelda game, once those first two dungeons get knocked out it's all uphill. However, I also think that you would certainly not agree. In fact, i'd likely guess that you do not enjoy puzzles in games you play at all, and thats all Zelda is really. Combat and puzzles.
Tell that to Portal and Prince of Persia. Nicely done, though.