Did you try the online free-roaming? I could see someone getting bored by the single player, but it would suck if you missed out on a taste of the multi-player. It wouldn't have made up for the single-player or the unresponsive controls, but wreaking havok with other GTA players was the best part.Adam Jensen said:Since the usual suspects have been identified, I'll do something shocking and say GTA IV. It was boring beyond human comprehension.
I didn't like the story either, but the game itself wasn't a disappointing sequel.Psychotic-ishSOB said:Jak 3's story was total ass, whereas Jak II's is one of my all time favorites.
KOTOR Might be my favorite game ever. Then I played KOTOR 2 and was more disappointed by it than any other game. I even played through twice to make sure it wasn't me. I know it sounds odd to play through a 50-something hour game a second time after not liking it the first(and not getting achievements for it), but I REALLY wanted to like it.Blindrooster said:Kotor 2. It's one of my favorite games, i just always put it on my list as it was sadly rushed and not finished.
I thought dow 2 was good, but it irks me too when a game completely changes its shit for the "sequel". If your going to go in a different direction, make it a spin-off, not a sequel.dickywebster said:dow 2, mostly cause it was just an entirely different game (it is a personal bug bear of mine when a game changes genre and gameplay so it bares no likenss to the original yet claims its a sequel)
Or at least change the name perhaps?dead.juice said:I thought dow 2 was good, but it irks me too when a game completely changes its shit for the "sequel". If your going to go in a different direction, make it a spin-off, not a sequel.dickywebster said:dow 2, mostly cause it was just an entirely different game (it is a personal bug bear of mine when a game changes genre and gameplay so it bares no likenss to the original yet claims its a sequel)
The original WH40k tabletop game was based on battle scenarios. When they made dow, they were taking a game more like dow 2 and making it an RTS. It's a great achievement to have successfully turned WH40k into a RTS, and I can see the disappointment in taking that series ideal, and stepping backwards with it.dickywebster said:Or at least change the name perhaps?dead.juice said:I thought dow 2 was good, but it irks me too when a game completely changes its shit for the "sequel". If your going to go in a different direction, make it a spin-off, not a sequel.dickywebster said:dow 2, mostly cause it was just an entirely different game (it is a personal bug bear of mine when a game changes genre and gameplay so it bares no likenss to the original yet claims its a sequel)
Get rid of the number and add a subtitle at least. I think that'd do the job.
And yeah dow 2 wasnt a bad game, but i was looking forwards to swarming the place with tyranid hordes like i did with orks and guard in the older ones, but then they cut the numbers and added this cover based stuff which kinda annoyed me.
The story and campaign were vastly imporved and interesting compared to the last ones, but i just didnt enjoy it as much, maybe cause it felt almost cut down, less races, less manpower you could deploy and while the campaign as good, it was still a lot smaller.
but then i do like rts games where i can build large armie so im probably biased there