The Old Republic: How does it measure up?

Recommended Videos

Suthainn

New member
Feb 3, 2011
1
0
0
SmashLovesTitanQuest said:
The first is trading. Trading and the economy are two of the most important things in an MMO. Now, in TOR, people have been banned for - this is true, look it up - buying items cheaply and selling them at higher prices. This is without exploiting bugs or anything of that nature. How the hell does that make any sense? Buying cheap and selling high, its standard fair in MMOs, its something people base their characters around. One could argue that TOR is simply different in this respect, but do I really want to invest time and money into a game where the economy is controlled to the penny by the developers, with no breathing space? Not really.
Proven to be trolls. Bioware responded to every person claiming such a ban on their forums showing their accounts were all active and had received no infringements. Plus their lead community rep categorically stated they would do no such thing, exploiting bugs is the only reason you would get banned via the AH. You got trolled.

The combat is extremely lackluster. To be fair, its not that much worse than any other MMO, it just fails to bring anything new to the table, which is disappointing considering the universe it is set in. Think of the potential Jedi combat, for instance, has. Then compare it to TOR. Click on enemy, go make a cup of tea, maybe click an ability from time to time (which has a 0.5 second lag on it, by the way, game breaking in PvP).
There's an option in preferences to turn the delay after casting before you can cast again from 0.75s to 0.00s, there's no lag on ability use at all unless your personal internet is slow, it's to stop people interrupting their own casts by spam clicking (which is awful gameplay). Any serious pvpers will turn it to 0.00s and never wonder about it again.

Combat graphics are clearly a personal thing, I for example, love the fact you parry and deflect blaster bolts whilst running towards an enemy, that your lightsaber and an enemies actually clash and block one another during combat, that even basic combat moves have multiple animations and instead of a 3 animation rotation it looks like a real fight.

Theres also a ton of bugs and exploits, for example the ability to farm infinite currency after one particular quest, or the dancing one you mentioned, or that you cannot unsubscribe from the game if you are banned... Just a thousand small and not so small annoyances, met with either ignorance or mass ban hand outs by EA.
Again, the bans are handed out for people clearly exploiting and abusing bugs they knew were not intended, for massive personal gain. I am glad to see such cheaters gone. There are patches every single day currently fixing these bugs and getting the game better and better.
 

Woodsey

New member
Aug 9, 2009
14,548
0
0
SmashLovesTitanQuest said:
Terribly.

Riddled with game breaking bugs and exploits. Thats forgivable for an MMO, but the way they have handled these problems? Unacceptable.

Then of course theres the lackluster combat, no trading allowed... Etc. Could go into detail but I cant be bothered right now.
What do you mean "no trading"?

OT: Enjoying it a lot so far. Main quests are interesting (and long), voice-acting's good, flashpoints are a highlight (although the ones without much talky not so much), combat is fun (although I didn't play WoW at all, let alone for 8 years).

I've seen about 3 bugs in ~25 hours of gameplay (although one does stop me from completing a side-quest at the minute), its been updated a bunch, and they're very communicative with the community.

Complaints: I do find the world's too static, and I'm not a great fan of the design of the 4 or 5 I've visited so far, and PvP lags massively for me for some reason. Oh, and speeders should be given far sooner for about half the price.
 

Nathan Allison

New member
Jan 28, 2011
26
0
0
I have 1 major problem with SWTOR

Other than story telling, it's more World of Warcraft than Star Wars.

The combat is so bad, mashing the 1 key over and over makes me feel like I'm playing a Dynasty Warrior game, minus the over-the-top Koei craziness fun. People are entertained by that?! Really?! If you think SWTOR combat is good, pick up Bayonetta, Tales of Vesperia, Witcher 2 or Dark Souls, those games will blow your !@#$ing mind.

Pathetic bosses, I don't mean they're to easy, I mean they're just lame. I have yet to run across a boss that made combat fun. A mobile 2 story cannon sounds awesome, but in the end it's tank, spam healz for about 20 !@#$ minutes.

This is World of Warcraft people, spice up story all you want, bragging that you can kill quest givers? That's a good thing? Whoopy !@#$ing do, what does that accomplish? Oh right, Red Eyes Black Dragon, er um, Red Eyes Black Jedi. Not to mention the ugly Aesthetics.

Believe it or not, what I typed before isn't my biggest problem. My biggest problem: BioWare could have made something special from SWTOR, made it really unique and innovative. Instead, they made WoW with lightsabers.

Sums up my experience [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=68VfgesWmcI]

Oh well, at least there is still Guild Wars 2.
 

Paladin Anderson

New member
Nov 21, 2011
194
0
0
Sixcess said:
I'd speculate two years to some kind of F2P model - less than two years if the update schedule sucks or EA gives in to temptation and starts pushing microtransactions at its subscribers.
This is EA. The company that would crucify their mothers if there was a nickle to be had in it. I'd give it a month before they come out with micro transactions.

It's an EA game. I'm not touching it.
 

spartandude

New member
Nov 24, 2009
2,721
0
0
i havnt played it, but to the people who are defending the bugs and what not, yes it is only a months out and will have bugs, but its got to go against WoW whether it likes it or not, to do that you need to have a top quality product from day one

EDIT, however i will make a complaint, its not KotOR III!!!, did they have massive brain strokes at EA/Bioware and decide that rather than creating the game people have been asking for since 2004 they went for an MMORPG which nowhere near as many will buy and would mean they have to go up against WoW, i mean seriously what were they smoking!?
 

spartandude

New member
Nov 24, 2009
2,721
0
0
Paladin Anderson said:
Sixcess said:
I'd speculate two years to some kind of F2P model - less than two years if the update schedule sucks or EA gives in to temptation and starts pushing microtransactions at its subscribers.
This is EA. The company that would crucify their mothers if there was a nickle to be had in it. I'd give it a month before they come out with micro transactions.

It's an EA game. I'm not touching it.
tbh i think its more likely for them to cancel the game than make it F2P
 

luckshot

New member
Jul 18, 2008
426
0
0
Sixcess said:
lordmardok said:
I realize that a lot of magazines are touting the whole 'fast growing' thing and I will say this about it: it's a misleading premise. You see SW:TOR is a well known and beloved franchise despite all of Mr. Lucas's efforts, and has a devoted and dedicated fan base. This virtually ensures a good return in the first month or so.
"Fastest growing" is lazy magazine writers quoting Bioware's press releases word for word. Said press release was issued around a week ago, so how they managed to measure 'growth' when the game had been live for about 10 days, if that,... well, only EA/Bioware's PR department knows how they did that.

Anyway, I'll say what I always say about TOR. It's a good game but a bad MMO. The main class quests are well up to Bioware's usual standard and if you're looking for the closest thing you will likely ever get to KOTOR 3, or a typical Bioware RPG, then you'll have fun.

If you don't like heavily linear MMOs then look elsewhere. TOR is the themeparkiest themepark ever, and the worlds feel more like movie sets than actual worlds.


I simply don't feel it has the depth to last. The people that came for the story aren't going to stay en masse for the raiding, and the raiders will eventually go back to WoW, like they always do...

...well unless Mists of Pandaria is even worse than expected.
i agree with most of what you said, in SW:TOR you get to roleplay...the role/character they have chosen for you. while that works in a single player game, it doesnt feel right to me when there are thousands of others doing the exact same things in the same order at the same time playing the same role in one of the 3 same ways

i have caught myself trying to pause the game when the phone rings while playing some of the story missions, and then i am reminded that it's a mmo

and as you say the story wont keep everyone when they're done, it will depend on them pushing out fun and well written story pieces to keep people playing...which will eat into profits
 

isometry

New member
Mar 17, 2010
708
0
0
My problem with SW:TOR is that the graphics and gameplay are so out of date. Most of the big MMOs in recent years have better graphics, animations, better combat, and more interesting character building (I don't mean "story", I mean picking skills, traits, etc to build the character).

I wish I could like the game, since I like KoTOR and MMOs, but it just feels like a huge step backwards from modern MMOs, like going back to 2007 or so. The story and the license just don't make up for the bad graphics, combat, and character building.
 

Kahunaburger

New member
May 6, 2011
4,141
0
0
Nathan Allison said:
Sums up my experience [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=68VfgesWmcI]
Haha this guy's youtube channel is amazing. See below: SWTOR vs. some shovelware MMORPG from Korea.

 

BloatedGuppy

New member
Feb 3, 2010
9,569
0
0
lordmardok said:
So those of us who decide to invest in what magazines have named the "fastest growing MMO of all time", Star Wars: The Old Republic, have had a decent chance to play through. A great deal of people have already reached maximum level and it seems like the production company is trying it's best to scramble together good end game content above and beyond what it put out for release.

My question to the escapist community is this: How do you think it measures up as an MMO? Will it dethrone WoW or at the very least rise up to the same level? Or is it another samey clone, no pun intended, destined to be relegated to the free-to-play section in a few months like DC Universe and just about every other MMO in the last few years.

I'm not putting my own opinion up because frankly I want to know what the general public thinks as a whole since frankly this whole will be decided by how many people like it, not singular forum trolls like myself.
I'm afraid you're not going to get many useful or coherent responses to this question. Moreso than popular single player games, MMOs tend to be extremely polarizing. Furthermore, many of your respondents will ONLY have played WoW, or experienced the genre in the shadow of WoW, and have very little understanding of what to expect from a MMO, what a reasonable base of subscribers looks like, what constitutes "success", what subscriber ebb and flow looks like, etc, etc. Confirmation bias will have them read one bad review or good review and declare it "the truth". Those who dislike the game will dismiss all its defenders as "fanoys", those who like it will dismiss all its detractors as "haters", and on and on and on. Not to mention most MMOs should not be reviewed until the 3 month mark, which is when you'll have your best idea of how it's settling in, what the player base can be expected to look like, how end game dynamics are shaping up, how quickly content is being added/errors fixed, and so on and so on and so on. They are unusual animals, MMOs, in that you are never buying a finished product...the game will continue to evolve and change, and may end up looking very different a year or two from now than it did at release.

Regardless though...

Graphics: Quite good, if you enjoy the stylized "Clone Wars" aesthetic. Some questionable texture work here and there. Nicely differentiated planets. Engine isn't very well optimized yet, though, and performance varies wildly from machine to machine without any real rhyme or reason.

Sound: Iconic Star Wars sounds. Music is classic Star Wars, but could've been leveraged more. Voice acting is almost uniformly excellent, as we've come to expect from Bioware.

Storytelling: The big lure for TOR over its fellows. It's...it's not going to make anyone throw their copy of Planescape Torment in the fire, if you know what I mean, but there is some basic, rudimentary storytelling here, and that puts it miles ahead of its current competition. The class stories are the most compelling, but also the most quickly exhausted. I'd expect a couple of hundred hours of unique content if you alt, and then the freshness of the story will wear off.

Crafting: Neat system, lots of balance issues. Currently underwhelming and over-expensive. Needs work.

Combat: Fast, fun, kinetic. Some weird difficulty spikes. Some issues with ability delay that are being looked into by Bioware that fuss with high end PvP and PvE. Having companions along make the game more solo friendly, as you can compensate for natural class weaknesses.

Content: Strong for a launch MMO, weak when weighed against the 7 year old World of Warcraft. Probably one of the best launch MMOs in memory though, for content.

Bugs: Many. Not atypical for new MMOs, but enough to be a near constant low-key irritation, if not occasionally extremely frustrating. Range from mild cosmetic glitches to quest breaking bugs. Some TLC is needed. I would estimate the game was released 2-3 months ahead of schedule, polish wise.

Class/Race diversity: 8 classes from 4 root classes, mirrored on each side (very rigid mirrors too, not slightly differentiated mirrors as seen in a game like Warhammer). Cosmetic differences only for race selection. Those liking a lot of choices may be disappointed here.

PvP: Currently somewhat underdeveloped, it's something of an afterthought at the moment. There is no serious PvP end game in place at this time.

Group Play: Flashpoints are fun...although they don't have quite as much character as some of WoW's standout dungeons, they are better than many offerings for instanced group content. Having little story moments woven in is a nice touch. Groups are limited to 4 players, and as the tank/healer to DPS ratio is similar here to in other games using the holy trinity this puts even more of a crunch on DPS. Looking for group tools are currently underdeveloped and barely utilized, making finding a "dungeon" group difficult before you simply level past it.

No Open World: This is a lament for some, but a non-instanced galaxy would have been quite an achievement. There is significantly more "world content" here than in Rift, but progress through it is just as linear. This is very much a theme park MMO.

So, where would I rank it?

I'd say it falls in line with some of the more successful post-WoW MMOs for launch...Aion and Rift come most immediately to mind...performing better in some areas, worse in others. It has a serious leg up on those games due to the potency of the IP, however, and the developer/publisher muscle of Bioware/EA. Big initial sales numbers should help it attain and maintain the critical mass it needs to get over the inevitable initial subscriber hump. I expect it to settle somewhere between 1M and 2M subscribers, with a possible surge up to 3M if Bioware is quick about sorting out issues and adding some compelling end game content to keep people re-upping instead of banking on heavy alt play. Keeping in mind that WoW's North American audience peaked at about 3M, that would be a notable accomplishment.

It is worth noting that "a good number" of people have NOT reached maximum level yet, despite leveling being fairly brisk. The bulk of the player base is still between 15-30. As usual, MMO veterans and achievement focused players have reached 50 very quickly, and are laboring under the misconception that because they got there and their friends got there, everyone else is there too. The winter holidays allowed for quite a push, as well...TOR hit a concurrent players mark of 350,000, which, given concurrent players is seldom higher than 15% of subscribers and peaks at around 30% (which would be remarkable) gives you a good idea of how popular the game is at launch. Launch popularity =/= long term success, mind you, but the high subscriber numbers of the eternally struggling Galaxies gives one the feeling that the Star Wars IP has substantial staying power.

That help?
 

Kahunaburger

New member
May 6, 2011
4,141
0
0
luckshot said:
and as you say the story wont keep everyone when they're done, it will depend on them pushing out fun and well written story pieces to keep people playing...which will eat into profits
Good writing on a short time limit? From modern Bioware?

 

Dumbfish1

New member
Oct 17, 2008
523
0
0
It's a clone of WoW, but it's a very good one. So good it's actually the best WoW-clone there is, including WoW. If you want a WoW style MMO this is the best one. I find myself playing it for the story (Sith Inquisitor) more than to level up my character. There's virtually no grind.

However it does nothing to inovate, it copies the best features of other MMOs, but I think this is a dying format. It's most likely going to be the last great WoW style game, there's plenty of interesting looking MMOs coming up, planetside 2 and Guildwars 2 to name a few.
 

Kahunaburger

New member
May 6, 2011
4,141
0
0
BloatedGuppy said:
there is some basic, rudimentary storytelling here
I think this is the problem. It's not exactly good by the standards of storytelling in general, or even other games (particularly not most other Bioware games.) So all it can really compete with is other MMOs.

Then, it runs into the issue that people don't play multiplayer games to have a story told to them - they play them to experience their own stories in an interesting and enjoyable environment. Less "remember the time the character in a cutscene said the thing?" and more "remember the time we beat The Library on Legendary at 3 AM/owned everything as a Heavy-Medic combo/killed Crawmerax/got our house blown up by creepers?"
 

BloatedGuppy

New member
Feb 3, 2010
9,569
0
0
Dumbfish1 said:
It's a clone of EQ, but it's a very good one. So good it's actually the best EQ-clone there is, including WoW. If you want an EQ style MMO this is the best one. I find myself playing it for the story (Sith Inquisitor) more than to level up my character. There's virtually no grind.

However it does nothing to innovate, it copies the best features of other MMOs, but I think this is a dying format. It's most likely going to be the last great EQ style game, there's plenty of interesting looking MMOs coming up, planetside 2 and Guildwars 2 to name a few.
I fixed your post for you. I really wish more people weren't laboring under the impression that the genre started in November 2004. It might give them some perspective, as well as understanding that "WoW clones" are just the evolution of a distinct sub genre of MMO that has been around for over a decade now and started with Everquest.

They're not going anywhere any time soon, either. GW2 is an evolution of this sub genre as well.
 

BloatedGuppy

New member
Feb 3, 2010
9,569
0
0
Kahunaburger said:
I think this is the problem. It's not exactly good by the standards of storytelling in general, or even other games (particularly not most other Bioware games.) So all it can really compete with is other MMOs.

Then, it runs into the issue that people don't play multiplayer games to have a story told to them - they play them to experience their own stories in an interesting and enjoyable environment. Less "remember the time the character in a cutscene said the thing?" and more "remember the time we beat The Library on Legendary at 3 AM/owned everything as a Heavy-Medic combo/killed Crawmerax/got our house blown up by creepers?"
Well, I agree and disagree.

No, this is not exactly good by the standards of storytelling in general, but then maybe a dozen games TOTAL in the history of the medium are.

No, this is not exactly good by the standards of good storytelling in games, either, it's stubbornly average.

Yes, it does only really compete with other MMOs, but those are its competition, and it does blow them out of the water in this regard.

I had similar misgivings about adding heavy story content to a genre that didn't particularly seem to need it, but I've been pleasantly surprised so far. It does enhance the experience. Whether I will feel the same way after another 150 hours remains to be seen, but it does allow for more of a sense of "character", rather than your avatar merely being an extension of your will. Will it appeal to hardcore raiders and the PvP crowd? Probably not, but the bulk of MMO subscribers over the last half dozen years have been casual gamers, and I think they'll eat it up.
 

Squidden

New member
Nov 7, 2010
241
0
0
I've had the best time playing SWTOR out of any other MMO I've played so far. It takes a lot of things from WoW, enough that it can be called a WoW clone, but it doesn't take them lazily. It takes the best things and improves on the worse things. This, coupled with a fantastic story and character development, makes it a very good game that could stand up to WoW.

That being said, it's got plenty of flaws. It's not properly optimized yet and runs fairly poorly on most rigs. This will probably change, though, because it's only been out for a few weeks now.

As for what people are saying about the bugs, they're really overstating the amount and affect of the bugs. Bugs are expected of an MMO during launch. Look at any MMO out there, and all of them had bugs upon release. People should have understood that there would be problems since the game hasn't had a consistent development for over seven years like WoW. The game is certainly still playable.

If you want to, you could treat the game like KotOR 3 and solo through the campaign, because it stands up by itself. BioWare created missions with stories and added the objectives afterwards, where Blizzard created the objectives (such as "Go to field, collect 30 boar snouts, return.") and then added a story in afterwards to fit the objectives. That's why the campaign and mission aspect of TOR is so fantastic, because you don't mind collecting a few things or disabling some machinery since there is a reason to do it. They've also implemented a bonus system where you can go out of your way to kill some extra people or damage something above and beyond for extra reward. You don't have to do it, but you'll get something extra if you do.

Overall, TOR is a great game that I've enjoyed immensely for the past few weeks. I've sunk in a good deal of hours on ONE character, without even doing a large portion of the multiplayer content. I would personally recommend it to anybody who liked WoW.

EDIT:


BloatedGuppy said:
GW2 is an evolution of this sub genre as well.
Guild Wars 2 promises to be vastly different from other MMOs. It's got a completely revamped questing system and (apparently) will get rid of the triad system where you require a healer, a tank and a DPS.
 

BloatedGuppy

New member
Feb 3, 2010
9,569
0
0
Squidden said:
Guild Wars 2 promises to be vastly different from other MMOs. It's got a completely revamped questing system and (apparently) will get rid of the triad system where you require a healer, a tank and a DPS.
Distinct classes.
Level up to gain more power.
Hotbar activated skills.
Aggro-damage-heal damage trinity still exists, it's just self-contained now, so while they have torn down the trinity to some degree, the mechanics of combat remain the same.

The Secret World is more of a departure from the Everquest formula than Guild Wars 2. I'm looking forward to GW2, but it's an evolutionary game, not a revolutionary game.
 

FieryTrainwreck

New member
Apr 16, 2010
1,968
0
0
As someone who played Rift for the last year or so, I think SWTOR is actually pretty shite. The game is buggy as hell, the mechanics are pretty dated, the graphics are borderline last gen (PC-wise), and the ability lag is frustrating as hell. It doesn't feel nearly as solid as WoW did 5+ years ago, and it definitely doesn't measure up to the polish of Rift.

But Rift doesn't have a) an overrated license that's been completely run into the ground the last decade, or b) Bioware's overrated storytelling. Sorry if that's a sore spot for a lot of folks around here, but I've played through (I think) every Bioware RPG. They're great. They're also 100% the same goddamn story over and over and over again, and all of the same cliched, predictable narrative elements are on display in TOR.

My overall take? If you're not sick to death of Bioware's storytelling, and you haven't played any of the deeper, more polished MMOs on the market (most notably Rift), you'll probably enjoy TOR.
 

BloatedGuppy

New member
Feb 3, 2010
9,569
0
0
ravenshrike said:
TwitchyGamer101 said:
*Game doesn't need macros. Key-binds work just fine.
They work just fine in theory but when your companion bar interferes with the keybinds and bound keys will not work when moused over ops window or the rest of the UI it's a big fucking problem for healing specs.
The UI is a problem in general, I should've mentioned that in my summary. If you're going to not include macros and mods at release, you need to have a customizable UI. It's nice, I suppose, that everyone is on a level playing field, but "Everyone has to wrestle with the same terrible UI" is not a super selling point.
 

funksobeefy

New member
Mar 21, 2009
1,007
0
0
I was going to get it, then was enlightened to the fact that I would have to pay for 60 days in order to get the "free" month.

Fuck. That. Shit.

I just went out and bought Shogun Total War and can play for free