there are many ways to go about it, US citizen, citizen of the US, someone from the US, etc..No_Remainders said:So, what would you have me call them? "A United States...ian"?gmaverick019 said:I didn't mention nor do I care that the person was American, which is funny on the matter as "American" can technically cover the whole North/South Continents, so you basically just shot yourself in the foot with that one for being "stingy" over something so stupidly small, in which you just mistook the name of one people for the people of 2 whole continents. Nice one.
At one point it existed though, did it not? So visiting the same place as to where it used to be...????? where is the wrong in that?
Yeah, "American". What other word is there? I suppose I could've said "A citizen of the United States of America" but that would've been ridiculous.
So in this case. "American" is the only word that really applies, as that's the term of someone from the USA.
I've also pointed out that just because it used to be Leningrad, you won't say you're going there. You go to St. Petersburgh.
OneEyeX said:If I visit my old home, and go to my old bedroom where I grew up in, where am I?No_Remainders said:Saying, typing, it's quite easy to tell what they mean by how they say it.OneEyeX said:Pushing this topic further you repeatedly state that you are angered by people SAYING they're in Southern Ireland. But then ran with the capitalization argument. The problem is, verbally saying something can't be capitalized, so as you said previously, no, no you're NOT okay with people saying they're in southern Ireland because you can't tell the difference verbally.[/b]
When someone who is not from Ireland says "I want to visit southern Ireland", they are quite obviously not saying "I want to visit the southern part of The Republic of Ireland.", they are clearly under the impression that the country is named Southern Ireland, which it is not.
It was named such for... I think it was about 17 months or so, in total. But I'm hardly going to say "I want to go to Stalingrad", no. I'd say "I'd like to go to Volgograd". Just like I wouldn't call St Petersburg "Leningrad", because that would be ignorance on my part, not just because they're no longer named Stalingrad or Leningrad, but because you'd have to be fucking stupid to not use the correct name for a place.
Ask the majority of Irish people, they will tell you it's not Southern Ireland, and they will DEFINITELY correct people who say it.
I'm in my old Bedroom. Regardless of who currently owns the home; this significance of the place is based on my reasoning for entry. So if you visit St. Petersberg to visit Leningrad; you're visiting Leningrad.
Could you explain what you think the difference between less and fewer is that makes less not a replacement for fewer, I can understand not using fewer always for less but not the other way round, less means a lower quantity, fewer means a lower discrete quantity, continuous quantities include the discrete ones.You Can said:When people say less when they mean fewer, there's a difference. Also "and therefor" you don't need the and, they both serve the same function in the sentence, its like saying "and but."
Yes, Thank you. I also have a problem with our society's usage of the word rape. someone else said stuff about it, and I totally agree with them. I don't know anyone who has actually had stuff like that happen to them, but that doesn't mean I can't hate people who use the word lightly, without thinking about what it means. actually, I'm going to say I hate everyone who uses words because everyone else does, but they do not know what the words mean, and end up annoying people like me who care about things like that.thewaever said:Possibly straying into a sensitive topic...
I know this doesn't really fit in with the tone of the thread, but it's on topic: I find it really, really annoying, frustrating, & even sad when people misuse the word "gay" to mean "stupid," "annoying," or as a just plain bad word.
Nowadays, people use "gay" in the EXACT same ways that the racist bigots used to use the N word. There's nothing you can really do about it, either. If you call them out for it, they just get all defensive, "I would NEVER use the N word! But, I'll say things are gay all I want! I'm not a bigot. That's gay! Stop being a pussy."
CrashBang said:Could of.
Aaaaaaaaaarrrrgh!! Raaaaaaaaaage!!
This pisses me off more than the existence of chavs! How in hell do people think that 'could of' is correct grammar?! It's 'could have' or 'could've'. 'Could of'?! Seriously?!
...Christ, I have some stupid friends
His argument is that the Republic of Ireland =! southern Ireland, which is very much true. Northern Ireland constiutes 6 counties in the North of Ireland, not the Northern half of Ireland. The Republic of Ireland is in the north of Ireland, the Irish midlands and the south of Ireland, not southern Ireland only.OneEyeX said:And on a topic; just because the UK owns the nothern half of Ireland, doesn't make any variety of name changes and such to make anything less then Southern Ireland. Frankly, it covers over the same territory.
From looking at this, I can perceive that your argument is just jingoism and national pride. It'd be like if someone told me I lived in Southern Canada. They're not wrong, they're not exactly right but they're not wrong.