thecoreyhlltt said:
holy christ, whenever someone tries to tell me i'm wrong about a Star Wars trivia question... or when so called star wars fans say episodes 1-3 are shit and what not, if you think they suck; then A) you're not a star wars fan. and B) YOU SUCK!
1) Meesa has da dreadlocks anna talksa like a bad triesa to impersonate a rapper. Meesa do dis for hours. Yousa getsa sicksa ofsa itsa beforesa wesa throughsa.
2) This guy? Hey, Senator PALPATINE. Seriously, Palpatine. You know how, like, the Emperor, bad guy, evil, all that, he was Emperor Palpatine, well, this guy, Senator Palpatine, he's Senator Palpatine like Emperor Palpatine was Emperor Palpatine 'cause he's Palpatine and that guy's Palpatine and because this is before, like before Emperor Palpatine, Senator Palpatine is actually going to be Emperor Palpatine. You see the cloak, right? Remember how Emperor Palpatine had that dark grey cloak and the hood like, right like ... like that, the way Senator Palpatine's wearing his now? See how he's wearing that? Remember how the Emperor wore a cloak that was just like that and he wore it like that and, like, Palpatine and, y'know, Palpatine? Yeah? This guy, Senator Palpatine, he's the guy who's going to be Emperor Palpatine. Hear the voice? Isn't that creepy, the way he sounds exactly like Emperor Palpatine? He's totally going to be the Emperor. Palpatine, man, I'm telling you. This guy holds his hands up like ... let's just focus right on those hands and the way he's holding them. Like, totally Emperor Palpatine of the future, right here, guys. I'm telling you.
3) Zooom zoooooom zzzzzzzzzzoom zzoooooom zoommmmmmmmmm zzzzzzzzzooooooooommmmmmmmmm zoom zzzzzzzzzzzooooooooooooooommmmmmmmmmmmm zoom zoom zoom zzzzzzooooooooommmmmmmm zoom pew pew pew zoooooommm zzzzzooommmmmm zzzzzzooooommmmm zzzzzzoooooooommmmmmmmm zzzzzzzzzooooooooommmmmmmmmmm zzzzzzzzzzooooooooommmmmmmmmm zzzzzzzzzzooooooooooommmmmmmmmmm zzzzzzzzzzooooooooooommmmmmmmmm zzzzzzzzzzzzooooooooommmmmmmmm zzzzzzooooooooommmmm zooooommmmmmmmmm zoooooooooooooooooommmmmm zoooooooom zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzooommmm zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz zzzzzzzzzzzzz zzzzzzzzzzzzz zzzzzzzzzzzzz zzzzzzzzzzzzz zzzzzzzzzzzzz zzzzzzzzzzzzz zzzzzzzzzzzzz zzzzzzzzzzzzz zzzzzzzzzzzzz
Other than that, R2D2 was pretty cool.
UltraXan said:
Talented seabird you have there.
Valkyrie101 said:
Angerwing said:
When people say "Evolution is 'just a theory'". It just tells me they profoundly misunderstand science, and it makes me angry inside.
Remind that evolution is a theory, but so is religion. That equalises the positions, so you can play the Evidence Game.
Noooooo!!!!!
Religion is not a scientific theory.
"The sky is blue because we're all inside a giant lily," while something someone may willingly believe, is not a scientific theory.
"The universe was sneezed out of the nose of the Great Weezleblort," while an inaccurate attempt to quote
The Hitchhiker's Guide To The Galaxy, is not a scientific theory.
That the kinetic energy of an object is proportional to its mass is more of a law than a theory, but it's a lot closer to being a theory than any religion is.
See the Evolution thread [http://www.escapistmagazine.com/forums/read/18.276340-Evolution?page=1] for more details.
Da Chi said:
People who refer to Irony when it really is co-incidence. I end up raging and correcting them.
EVERY time! I doubt a single one of them has looked up the definition yet either.
Irony: fate's sarcastic sense of humour.
Irony [http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/irony]:
i·ro·ny
1    [ahy-ruh-nee, ahy-er-] Show IPA
?noun, plural -nies.
1.
the use of words to convey a meaning that is the opposite of its literal meaning: the irony of her reply, ?How nice!? when I said I had to work all weekend.
2.
Literature .
a.
a technique of indicating, as through character or plot development, an intention or attitude opposite to that which is actually or ostensibly stated.
b.
(especially in contemporary writing) a manner of organizing a work so as to give full expression to contradictory or complementary impulses, attitudes, etc., especially as a means of indicating detachment from a subject, theme, or emotion.
3.
Socratic irony.
The essential feature of irony is the indirect presentation of a contradiction between an action or expression and the context in which it occurs. In the figure of speech, emphasis is placed on the opposition between the literal and intended meaning of a statement; one thing is said and its opposite implied, as in the comment, ?Beautiful weather, isn't it?? made when it is raining or nasty. Ironic literature exploits, in addition to the rhetorical figure, such devices as character development, situation, and plot to stress the paradoxical nature of reality or the contrast between an ideal and actual condition, set of circumstances, etc., frequently in such a way as to stress the absurdity present in the contradiction between substance and form. Irony differs from sarcasm in greater subtlety and wit. In sarcasm ridicule or mockery is used harshly, often crudely and contemptuously, for destructive purposes.
OT: bad English, bad military stuff and bad biology.
I went to one of those schools where it was possible to get a bonus point on your essay by using a semi-colon correctly and, of course, possible to lose an entire grade by interpreting part of the book in a way that disagrees with the teacher's own interpretation of it. I read everything literally. These two may or may not be related, but I assert that each is true. When I see: "They didn't know there sister was in you're house," I read that as: "They did not know in that place sister was in you are house." When I see: "I know your in there," I read that as: "I know the in there that belongs to you." This means bad English slows me down and slowly gives me a headache.
I have spent some time in a green suit, working for war criminals and so on. I was not perfect. Not one of us was perfect. We were not superheroes. Each of us was better at some things than at others. I do not remember everything from that time. I did not know everything about every aspect of every military job at the time. The levels of incompetence, nepotism, narcissism and testosterone poisoning were spectacular. There were some total arseholes and utter bitches. There were also a few genuinely decent people.
The Hurt Locker was an incredibly uncomfortable experience for me because I spent the whole time wondering WTF they were doing or thinking and where their officers were, apart from the brief moments I spent wondering how anyone thought a soldier could be that cheerful and coherent with his femur broken by a bullet, noting how much better a scene had been done in at least one earlier film, gritting my teeth at the token incompetent Britons or taking offence at how stupid the directors and producers must think the audience are if they expected a particular piece of editing to get past unnoticed.
I studied biology. I know what that clicky thing is and how to use it. I know sterile procedure. I know you can't just clone an antibody from a blood sample and get gallons of antibodies in a few hours, and you can't use antibodies as a vaccine to provide long-term protection. The happy ending in
Outbreak ruined the film for me. It seemed they'd set out to make a six-hour epic tale of fear, loss, courage, determination, tragedy, devastation, intrigue, politics, tension, terror, hope and redemption and then, quarter of the way through, been told to wrap it up in 110 minutes. It was a waste of a good opening and some well-presented scenes [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pu9voNeFqNs] and punchy lines [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mj9SUJdpJS4#t=52s]. I'm annoyed that the opening title sequence isn't easy to find on youtube, because it made a pretty good trailer itself.