I don't care if people don't like the original trilogy. But I've had more people call me a moron because I DO like the movies. There seems to be a lot more hate towards fans of them then haters.thecoreyhlltt said:holy christ, whenever someone tries to tell me i'm wrong about a Star Wars trivia question... or when so called star wars fans say episodes 1-3 are shit and what not, if you think they suck; then A) you're not a star wars fan. and B) YOU SUCK!
When I was doing first aid a few years ago, the course was changed from checking for a pulse to checking for 'lifesigns' (pass the tricorder Mr. Spock!) because med-students in their 3rd year couldnt find a pulse on a life subject, but could on a plastic doll. Just sayin'.Quaxar said:Pretty much any show involving computers screws their facts up.
Games do not work without any kind of HUD.
And for fuck's sake... why do you guys manage to make a show about doctors solving complex illnesses but at the same time make them suck at basic life-saving skills?
CPR does not work like this, doctor House!
Captcha: Vitamin allesos - do you get enough of it?
Umm, then surely you'd know that Frankenstein's monster had no name. I can see where the Adam could come from (and how it would be a very appropriate name), but the fact is that it doesn't have a name.000Ronald said:When people refer to Adam (Frankenstein's Creature) as Frankenstein. And call-or imply-that he's stupid.
...yeah, Frankenstein was one of my favorite books.
I didn't think Troy wasn't that bad for inaccuracy. Firstly, they were going for a more realistic take on the book, thus omitting the Gods from the story, the characters still believe in and refer to them but they don't actually exist in real life, so yeah. Not in the film, same with the myth that Achilles was actually invincible, save for his heel.larysalove said:Whenever a movie proves it knows nothing about mythology. Or a book. Or a person. Mostly Greek myth. I think the original details are interesting enough without changing them for "mass appeal."
Troy being one of the worst offenders, (that I actually saw) in my opinion.
This. I gave up on the online play after going into match after match of try-hards and cry babies. Which is a shame because the game is really enjoyable.I just play co-op vs AI and private matches from now on.Instant K4rma said:Stupid players in League of Legends. Not necessarily bad players, but stupid players. I understand if you die in lane because you're playing a new champ or just aren't very good. Fine. Perfectly acceptable. But then there are those people. You know of whom I speak. Those people that charge headfirst into a 1v5 with you standing beside him, and then blames you for not helping once he inevitably meets his demise. Those people really irritate me to no end.
I still think they could have at least asked the eagles. After all, people have known where they live ever since The Hobbit...though I suppose they live so far up that there's no way to get up there without wings. But couldn't they just bring Gandalf and have him amplify his voice with magic? (Can wizards do that in the books? Saruman did it in the Fellowship movie at Cahadras, but that scene was absent in the book) My point is, I think the Eagle's would probably listen if you told them Middle Earth will likely be destroyed and/or enslaved unless a ring is thrown into a volcano. Middle Earth is their home too, after all.Aetera said:What triggers do you have that send you into a nerd-rage?
One of mine is when people ask why they didn't just ride the eagles to Mordor/Rivendell/etc. The eagles are heralds of and were devised by Manwë himself, the leader of the Valar. When they help, it is basically divine intervention. It's not like calling a horse or something. The eagles are not at your beck and call.
I know that I have others, but I can't recall them right now. Share yours!
The Creature refers to itself as Adam, and so did Mary Shelly.Squarez said:Umm, then surely you'd know that Frankenstein's monster had no name. I can see where the Adam could come from (and how it would be a very appropriate name), but the fact is that it doesn't have a name.000Ronald said:When people refer to Adam (Frankenstein's Creature) as Frankenstein. And call-or imply-that he's stupid.
...yeah, Frankenstein was one of my favorite books.
OT: What causes my nerd rage?
Nerds not using their apparent intelligence actually reading or watching classic books/films etc. and instead spend it memorising all the minutia of the Star Wars expanded universe or collecting copious amounts of anime and starting hundreds of threads on internet forums about it.
Huh? I seems to have paraphrased this entire forum. My bad.
Personally speaking I loved that bit.Arsen said:Did they forget how horrible the Neo VS multiple Smiths fight scene was the second he picked up the poll?
That's still very wrong. I'm not sure how I can say this in another way that might make sense for you. I'm really not sure where to go from here.Valkyrie101 said:I wasn't disagreeing with you. I was saying that they can call evolution a theory, but then religion is also a theory. Then you go about comparing evidence, and that's when opponents of evolution start to lose (because they don't have any).Angerwing said:Christ... No. Just no.Valkyrie101 said:Remind that evolution is a theory, but so is religion. That equalises the positions, so you can play the Evidence Game.Angerwing said:When people say "Evolution is 'just a theory'". It just tells me they profoundly misunderstand science, and it makes me angry inside.
Evolution is a theory in the way that gravity is a theory. The way that colours are a theory. The way that germs are a theory.
When you learn the theory behind a subject, you're not learning about the speculative ideas behind something. You're learning the principles that explain said subject.
There is a profound difference between a scientific theory (as in the case of "Theory of Evolution") and a 'theory' in common parlance. The scientific equivalent to a 'theory' is a hypothesis. A scientific theory is a very robust and testable explanation of how something works.
You can disagree with evolution until the cows come home, if you have something to back up that claim. But denying evolution because it's "just a theory" means you're a fucking idiot.
If memory serves me correctly (it's been a while since I read Frankenstein), he only refers to himself as Adam once, and only in a metaphor. I'm not one for authorial intent, either.000Ronald said:The Creature refers to itself as Adam, and so did Mary Shelly.Squarez said:Umm, then surely you'd know that Frankenstein's monster had no name. I can see where the Adam could come from (and how it would be a very appropriate name), but the fact is that it doesn't have a name.000Ronald said:When people refer to Adam (Frankenstein's Creature) as Frankenstein. And call-or imply-that he's stupid.
...yeah, Frankenstein was one of my favorite books.
OT: What causes my nerd rage?
Nerds not using their apparent intelligence actually reading or watching classic books/films etc. and instead spend it memorising all the minutia of the Star Wars expanded universe or collecting copious amounts of anime and starting hundreds of threads on internet forums about it.
Huh? I seems to have paraphrased this entire forum. My bad.