I watched the videos as they came out. Both parts of Tropes vs Women in video games. I wouldn't support an idea I know nothing about.generals3 said:I forgot to add "and those who didn't see her videos" to the potential supporters. I have quoted her in many threads to prove that assertion and there are so many passages in her videos proving it i still wonder how people can ask that question. But being in a very arrogant mood instead of going through the effort of copy pasting text (again...) from her website i'll just say this "watch the videos".
And yes, traitors. There is no better word to describe a gamer who thinks unproven propaganda is a reason to guilt devs into doing certain things. It's showing 0 respect to video games and their makers. I've tried my fair share of diplomacy but it has been painfully clear: Anita's supporters don't care about facts. They only care about their goal and the method to get there is irrelevant. Lies, demonization, fact fabrication, it's all ok because it's for the "wimenz". It's white knighting pushed to its extreme.
"Unproven propaganda"? What is unproven? That the tropes are overused? That society influences media and media influences society?
What's wrong with guilting developers for lazy writing?
It's not 0 respect. The fact that the aspect of their work is being criticized means that their work matters enough. Is this not a form of respect?
What "lies, demonization, fact fabrication"?
And it's not for "wimenz". As I said, I want better writing.