This is Why Criticizing Anita Sarkheesian is Irrelevant and Pointless

Recommended Videos

The-Traveling-Bard

New member
Dec 30, 2012
228
0
0
Vrex360" post="9.410252.17179970 said:
The-Traveling-Bard" post="9.410252.17179888 said:
Snippy
You're quite welcome.

Also I do agree with you she stated her opinion, but I also stated she is now the person the world hates even if she is right. It doesn't matter what Anita does she will be hated for it even if she was donating her life to save humanity.

My number 3 rule still stands. It also clearly true and visible every almost every site you go on.

4.
But when she takes things out of context (When let's be honest. 90% of the time she does).
Or when she says something is sexist just because it doesn't fit HER idea of females that will mean she is (Or at least trying to) opposing her will on other people. (Which has done before in fact pretty much always does)

Oh this girl is weak and needs a man! SEXIST!
Oh this girl is strong and independent! OKAY!

Woman need man
and man need woman.

IT'S THE WAY WE HAVE ALWAYS BEEN SINCE THE DAWN OF FREAKING TIME.


About jokes.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VKgwczruOSQ

Your point is completely invalid since this aired on national tv with a massive audience chairing this shit on.
Don't give me. "It was one a time thing." because a one time thing that millions of people agreed that it was funny, and he deserved it.

I believe in making fun of everyone for any reason because if you can not laugh at yourself. Why?

" very depressing when you can't make honest cultural commentary without having to disavow the assumption that your feelings are motivated by an irrational hate-trigger response to different levels of melanin. You know what? A society where anyone can make jokes about anyone else and everyone laughs is a truly tolerant society. Political correctness-charged censorship only serves to engender resentment and distance between social groups. "

Also just because you don't share the same sense of humor as someone else. That doesn't mean the other person is a sexist/racist/whatever. That also doesn't give you the right to take away their personal enjoyment.

I like dead baby jokes.
Are you offended?
Good.
Now you can do what they teach you in fucking pre-school although people have forgotten this as they grow up into adults.

Get up. Walk your ass some where else.
 

Frozengale

New member
Sep 9, 2009
761
0
0
While I do agree that Anita has a right to her complaints, and that she does have some valid points in her vidoes, she doesn't get a pass this time. She is mad because Microsoft didn't reveal any games with a female protagonist. This is silly because an E3 reveal doesn't cover everything and they are under no obligation to reveal games to meet some kind of "gender quota". It's silly to get mad at a company for not revealing something that they were never obligated to reveal or talk about. At this point she is just being silly.

Then the fact that she keeps taking the hateful and spiteful comments and highlighting them. It's like she's trying to show us how "tough" and "virtuous" she is for going up against the vile hoards of the internet. It's the simple idea of "You cannot reveal virtue by trying to reveal virtue." She calls attention to those attacking her so she can then say, "See, look at me, look at how I fend of these trolls! Aren't I so great?" Which is sad, because I think she does have something to offer to the discussion, it's just that she always goes about it in the wrong way.

EDIT - Also... Mirror's Edge 2. Female. She may be Asian but she is still Female. Stop being Racist Anita. Or you know wait til the very end before you send out snarky comments.
 

Headdrivehardscrew

New member
Aug 22, 2011
1,659
0
0
ninjarafter said:
Wait, I'm confused. In the link she says "Thanks #XboxOne #E3 press conference for revealing to us exactly zero games featuring a female protagonist for the next generation"

But an article on the front page of the Escapist says "Mirror's Edge 2 was announced at the EA E3 2013 press conference moments ago"

So am I missing something here?
Well, let's just say that Little Miss Sarkastik Sunshine here isn't the sharpest tool in the shed when it comes to crunch time, actual effort or applying anything that deserves the label 'scientific approach'. She has a track history of being rather lazy, jumping to conclusions and not really even trying to back thesis, theory and observations up properly. She just applies her chosen slice of feminist (misandrist, revolutionary, communist) lore to whatever happens to catch her attention for a little while, spouts her stuff, gets applause from similarly inclined minds, on with the show, yay.

Anything and everything that can be used to 'prove' her point will immediately be used. Anything that contradics it will, most probably, be either ignored or get dismissed with little or no explanation. It's how totalitarian systems tend to function. Just watch her space, the hardcore lulz are guaranteed to come, as they are inevitable.
 

Vrex360

Badass Alien
Mar 2, 2009
8,377
0
0
The-Traveling-Bard said:
Also I do agree with you she stated her opinion, but I also stated she is now the person the world hates even if she is right. It doesn't matter what Anita does she will be hated for it even if she was donating her life to save humanity.
Which doesn't validate anything. The fact that people are willing to hate and dispute her even if she is clearly right is THEIR problem, not HERS. They cannot claim she MADE them act like this.

My number 3 rule still stands. It also clearly true and visible every almost every site you go on.
Yes and my point still stands, you can be decent in online forums without being a dickhead. To demonstrate I apologize if I came across as too personal or offensive to you.

4.
But when she takes things out of context (When let's be honest. 90% of the time she does).
Or when she says something is sexist just because it doesn't fit HER idea of females that will mean she is (Or at least trying to) opposing her will on other people. (Which has done before in fact pretty much always does)
To be fair though she bases a lot of her views on other works.


Woman need man
and man need woman.

IT'S THE WAY WE HAVE ALWAYS BEEN SINCE THE DAWN OF FREAKING TIME.
Except presumably for the gay cavemen, yes?


About jokes.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VKgwczruOSQ

Your point is completely invalid since this aired on national tv with a massive audience chairing this shit on.
Don't give me. "It was one a time thing." because a one time thing that millions of people agreed that it was funny, and he deserved it.
1. You won't hear me defending that either.
2. There was a big controversy over that as well.
3. The shitty behavior of a shitty show doesn't undo the shittiness of direct hateful insults being fired at people.

I believe in making fun of everyone for any reason because if you can not laugh at yourself. Why?

" very depressing when you can't make honest cultural commentary without having to disavow the assumption that your feelings are motivated by an irrational hate-trigger response to different levels of melanin. You know what? A society where anyone can make jokes about anyone else and everyone laughs is a truly tolerant society. Political correctness-charged censorship only serves to engender resentment and distance between social groups. "
'This ***** is making my dick soft' is not honest social commentary!

Also just because you don't share the same sense of humor as someone else. That doesn't mean the other person is a sexist/racist/whatever. That also doesn't give you the right to take away their personal enjoyment.
My point is that none of those tweets were jokes. They were direct hateful insults full of bigoted language and slurs designed to intimidate and bully a person into submission.
If these are jokes then the big bully who punches the smaller kids and takes their lunch money is Dylan Moran.


Now you can do what they teach you in fucking pre-school although people have forgotten this as they grow up into adults.

Get up. Walk your ass some where else.
When I was in pre-school I was taught that bullies should be called out on their bullying. That is what Sarkeesian is doing, whether or not you agree with her or not don't mistake 'fuck you, you stupid **** I hope you get raped' as open mike night at the local comedy club.
 

generals3

New member
Mar 25, 2009
1,197
0
0
Ahahahahahahaha. She's a joke, "these reactions show the male privilege in the gaming community". It's like she's a cartoon figure. A cartoon damsel in distress at that, she can't help but show how much she's a victim of the ebil internet. Come on white knights rescue the damsel!
 

The-Traveling-Bard

New member
Dec 30, 2012
228
0
0
Vrex360 said:
The-Traveling-Bard said:
Also I do agree with you she stated her opinion, but I also stated she is now the person the world hates even if she is right. It doesn't matter what Anita does she will be hated for it even if she was donating her life to save humanity.
Which doesn't validate anything. The fact that people are willing to hate and dispute her even if she is clearly right is THEIR problem, not HERS. They cannot claim she MADE them act like this.

My number 3 rule still stands. It also clearly true and visible every almost every site you go on.
Yes and my point still stands, you can be decent in online forums without being a dickhead. To demonstrate I apologize if I came across as too personal or offensive to you.

4.
But when she takes things out of context (When let's be honest. 90% of the time she does).
Or when she says something is sexist just because it doesn't fit HER idea of females that will mean she is (Or at least trying to) opposing her will on other people. (Which has done before in fact pretty much always does)
To be fair though she bases a lot of her views on other works.


Woman need man
and man need woman.

IT'S THE WAY WE HAVE ALWAYS BEEN SINCE THE DAWN OF FREAKING TIME.
Except presumably for the gay cavemen, yes?


About jokes.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VKgwczruOSQ

Your point is completely invalid since this aired on national tv with a massive audience chairing this shit on.
Don't give me. "It was one a time thing." because a one time thing that millions of people agreed that it was funny, and he deserved it.
1. You won't hear me defending that either.
2. There was a big controversy over that as well.
3. The shitty behavior of a shitty show doesn't undo the shittiness of direct hateful insults being fired at people.

I believe in making fun of everyone for any reason because if you can not laugh at yourself. Why?

" very depressing when you can't make honest cultural commentary without having to disavow the assumption that your feelings are motivated by an irrational hate-trigger response to different levels of melanin. You know what? A society where anyone can make jokes about anyone else and everyone laughs is a truly tolerant society. Political correctness-charged censorship only serves to engender resentment and distance between social groups. "
'This ***** is making my dick soft' is not honest social commentary!

Also just because you don't share the same sense of humor as someone else. That doesn't mean the other person is a sexist/racist/whatever. That also doesn't give you the right to take away their personal enjoyment.
My point is that none of those tweets were jokes. They were direct hateful insults full of bigoted language and slurs designed to intimidate and bully a person into submission.
If these are jokes then the big bully who punches the smaller kids and takes their lunch money is Dylan Moran.


Now you can do what they teach you in fucking pre-school although people have forgotten this as they grow up into adults.

Get up. Walk your ass some where else.
When I was in pre-school I was taught that bullies should be called out on their bullying. That is what Sarkeesian is doing, whether or not you agree with her or not don't mistake 'fuck you, you stupid **** I hope you get raped' as open mike night at the local comedy club.
;-; If you would be so kindly as to message me how you do this so we can have a better discussion. It would be great! :D ( I hope you're not getting angry.)

Anywho back on topic.

She is at fault completely. Since other people have also clearly she is just feeding to trolls to feed her own agenda that makes her worse than fucking Hitler. Preying on the weak and stupid because they don't know any better? Lawl. How low can you go.

Do you notice her face on the CNN news when the Lady told her "have you ever heard of don't feed the trolls?"
Her face just went "OH SHIT. I AM CAUGHT" but people are too stupid to read into what really went behind on that news cast that day. That YES Anita is literally using the hate to feed her agenda.

She's just has bad as School Shooters.

Oh! Nobody is listening to me! I'm going to go shoot up a school so people will pay attention to me.
ME, ME, ME, ME, ME.

It's also a worse fact that her SELF A PERSON FIGHTING ABOUT SEXIST IS ACTUALLY MOTHERFUCKING SEXIST!
She clearly states in her video that the only reason why man go after their loved ones is to fulfill a masculine duty that has been wounded.

Despite.. you know. The person took away the person they loved, built a family with, and other crap.

NOPE MASCULINE DUTY!


Let's not talk about gays. :b We don't need another flame war do we? Hahaha.
Even gays need a women to pass on their genetic Legacy.

Sex isn't about love yo. It's about baby making.

Okay, well yes. It's not a honest social commentary but that also wasn't my point.
My point is people are going to make fun of you regardless of who you are.
Anita isn't a fucking victim because she is a girl. She a victim of her own demise and stupidity which I will never, ever find acceptable and righteous by no means. America in general LOVES to play the victim game and it's down right sickening and disgusting how people can buy into this bullshit.

Anywho onto the actual angry comments.

Yeah, but do you honestly truly believe those people are actually sexist?
Or do you think they're just angry that this idiotic girl is trying to oppress her will on other people?
Do you think that the hate their have for Anita comes from any male superior thinking.
HELL! Do you even think for a second they even took a neno second to think about what they just posted?

All girls belong in the kitchen.
^ took me about a second to right that. No thought, no feeling, no complex secret hidden agenda behind it. Nothing.
People will say what they want on the internet because they get punished for it.
People also say things without thinking.
People do a lot of stupid things.


Jokes/insults. Fine.
Threats? Yeah, i'll agree with you. That's going too far. I'm asshole. I'm not a total asshole.

Anita asked for this shit.
Anita KNEW and is playing us ALL to get her way. That's the bottom line.

The fact she is *clearly trolling with that twitter posts proves it* because there was a few games when the main character was female.

IN FACT THEY EVEN HAD A FEMALE PLAYING IN- GAME WITH OTHER MALES BEING ALL NICE BUDDY, BUDDY.
 

Megalodon

New member
May 14, 2010
781
0
0
Vrex360 said:
My point is that none of those tweets were jokes. They were direct hateful insults full of bigoted language and slurs designed to intimidate and bully a person into submission.
If these are jokes then the big bully who punches the smaller kids and takes their lunch money is Dylan Moran.
While I'm not trying to defend some of those tweets, which were pretty scummy, not all of them were actually that bad or insulting. I don't think "Stop pushing your feminist agenda in video games" (8 on her list), "shut up" (11&12) "so what?" (20) or "Who cares?" (22) are direct, hateful insults. I think the inclusion of such tweets in her list "which exemplify the male privilege and male entitlement endemic in the gaming community today" is either padding, becuase there weren't enough actual offensive tweets for her victim complex, or that she's militant enough to not be able to differentiate between disagreement and hate speech.
 

The-Traveling-Bard

New member
Dec 30, 2012
228
0
0
Megalodon said:
Vrex360 said:
My point is that none of those tweets were jokes. They were direct hateful insults full of bigoted language and slurs designed to intimidate and bully a person into submission.
If these are jokes then the big bully who punches the smaller kids and takes their lunch money is Dylan Moran.
While I'm not trying to defend some of those tweets, which were pretty scummy, not all of them were actually that bad or insulting. I don't think "Stop pushing your feminist agenda in video games" (8 on her list), "shut up" (11&12) "so what?" (20) or "Who cares?" (22) are direct, hateful insults. I think the inclusion of such tweets in her list "which exemplify the male privilege and male entitlement endemic in the gaming community today" is either padding, becuase there weren't enough actual offensive tweets for her victim complex, or that she's militant enough to not be able to differentiate between disagreement and hate speech.
I almost, ALMOST feel like jumping on twitter just to say that I think Anita should stop acting like a school shooter, and if she has a problem with me saying something like that. Come do a live interview with me.
 

ThreeName

New member
May 8, 2013
459
0
0
imahobbit4062 said:
I love her solely for the fact that she's sent so many people into uncontrollable nerd rage.

She's a master troll, and it's fucking hilarious.
This. Nerds are such a great community, they just want to fucking offended. You know, like the feminists they decry. It's this brilliant circle of trying to be offensive and then being offended.
 

Legion

Were it so easy
Oct 2, 2008
7,186
0
0
Scummy reponses from scummy people (the twitter trolls), but it's pretty tiresome how she pretends its because she is a woman criticising games, rather than an issue people have with her specifically as an individual. She has a persecution complex of an almost astounding degree, or else she is just a very clever and manipulative person.

People go onto twitter and tell celebrities that they wish that their kids would get cancer and other nasty things, it doesn't "prove" anything at all. Except that anonymity causes people to act nastily, which most of us have known for years.

She is completely blinkered by sexism and is incapable of looking at anything beyond it.

Or to put it another way, if somebody such as Susan Arendt had said what Anita did, she would not have received these kinds of responses. If it was purely down to misogyny on behalf of gamers, then this kind of thing would happen to all who complain about it, not just a select few.
 

Vrex360

Badass Alien
Mar 2, 2009
8,377
0
0
The-Traveling-Bard said:
;-; If you would be so kindly as to message me how you do this so we can have a better discussion. It would be great! :D ( I hope you're not getting angry.)
It's okay, really. I should probably sign off soon anyway, I have study I should be doing.


She is at fault completely. Since other people have also clearly she is just feeding to trolls to feed her own agenda that makes her worse than fucking Hitler. Preying on the weak and stupid because they don't know any better? Lawl. How low can you go.
Can we leave Hitler out of this please? I hate Hitler, dude was a dick.
But again I don't see how she's feeding the trolls, considering people will take anything she says and find some way to make a controversy out of it (as you said) it seems unfair to hold up the idea of her feeding the trolls if she's at a point where she literally can't say or do anything without being trolled.

Do you notice her face on the CNN news when the Lady told her "have you ever heard of don't feed the trolls?"
Her face just went "OH SHIT. I AM CAUGHT" but people are too stupid to read into what really went behind on that news cast that day. That YES Anita is literally using the hate to feed her agenda.
Can't really comment on that, didn't see it.

She's just has bad as School Shooters.

Oh! Nobody is listening to me! I'm going to go shoot up a school so people will pay attention to me.
ME, ME, ME, ME, ME.
Except, you know, she hasn't killed anybody. So substantially different.

She clearly states in her video that the only reason why man go after their loved ones is to fulfill a masculine duty that has been wounded.
I didn't interpete it that way, I saw it more as her saying that what should have been a relationship comes across more like a maculine possession thing largely because the female characters are given so little screentime or presence that they barely register as much more than a plot device.
The difference between a damsel we barely know getting kidnapped or a characters wife/girlfriend dying at the start of the story and it actually having emotional weight is how it is portrayed. Like in Gears of War 2, Dom's wife is given virtually no character at all. We see her once, in a dream and we barely get any idea of what she's like, her relationship with him, her own personality her backstory or anything. We know she exists and Dom wants to get her back and... that's about it. She's not a character she's the idea of a character. Similar to Nicole in the first Dead Space, we know about her.
Because of their lack of characterization it is hard to gtake seriously this whole 'loved one' thing especially when usually the female lead dying is just set up for the male character to shout 'noooo' then go back to killing more baddies again.
Hell she mentioned Damsels that subvert the trope showing up in a later video and maybe she could bring up Cortana in Halo 4, as much as I've complained about that the central theme of Cortana slowly dying is handled really well. It's not just set up for Masterchief to get angry, we see how Cortana reacts to her encroaching finite existence as well and it actually gets pretty deep and even sad. Plus we already know Chief and Cortana's relationship because it had spent three games building up on it, she is a character in her own right. Not just a thing to be stolen or killed to start up a plot.

That, I think, was Sarkeesian's poi- wait a minute! I said no talking about her views. You tricked me!


Okay, well yes. It's not a honest social commentary but that also wasn't my point.
My point is people are going to make fun of you regardless of who you are.
Anita isn't a fucking victim because she is a girl.
Perhaps but surely you have to admit the very specific way people target her is because she's a girl, right?


quote]Yeah, but do you honestly truly believe those people are actually sexist?[/quote]
Yep. I'm sorry I just can't excuse some of the attitudes shown in those comments.

Or do you think they're just angry that this idiotic girl is trying to oppress her will on other people?
That's probably what they tell themselves but if they honestly think youtube videos are going to destroy gaming they are not only sexist but also hilariously paranoid.

Do you think that the hate their have for Anita comes from any male superior thinking.
No, just plain ol' idiotic sexism.

HELL! Do you even think for a second they even took a neno second to think about what they just posted?
Perhaps but they really should have because now they are being publicly vilified for that I do not feel sorry for them.

All girls belong in the kitchen.
^ took me about a second to right that. No thought, no feeling, no complex secret hidden agenda behind it. Nothing.
Perhaps but when you shout that down as a way to angrily refute someone talking about sexism suddenly it looks pretty bad.


People will say what they want on the internet because they get punished for it.
Part of the reason why I;m actually kind of glad she's highlighting these comments because at least now people will know they are reprehensible turd monsters.

People also say things without thinking.
Yep, but they should think before they type. I actually gave it serious thought before I posted for the first time on this thread for example and I was careful to mention I wasn't addressing anyone in this thread specifically.

People do a lot of stupid things.
No argument here. Just that 'stupid' and 'sexist' are not mutually exclusive.


IN FACT THEY EVEN HAD A FEMALE PLAYING IN- GAME WITH OTHER MALES BEING ALL NICE BUDDY, BUDDY.
Well that's good of them I guess. I admit I didn't see the Xbone e3 footage because looking at the Xbone keeps creating an image of the death of modern art in the name of a quick buck which depresses me but I will give them that if it's true.
 

Vrex360

Badass Alien
Mar 2, 2009
8,377
0
0
Megalodon said:
Vrex360 said:
My point is that none of those tweets were jokes. They were direct hateful insults full of bigoted language and slurs designed to intimidate and bully a person into submission.
If these are jokes then the big bully who punches the smaller kids and takes their lunch money is Dylan Moran.
While I'm not trying to defend some of those tweets, which were pretty scummy, not all of them were actually that bad or insulting. I don't think "Stop pushing your feminist agenda in video games" (8 on her list), "shut up" (11&12) "so what?" (20) or "Who cares?" (22) are direct, hateful insults. I think the inclusion of such tweets in her list "which exemplify the male privilege and male entitlement endemic in the gaming community today" is either padding, becuase there weren't enough actual offensive tweets for her victim complex, or that she's militant enough to not be able to differentiate between disagreement and hate speech.
Yeah but shouting 'shut up' isn't exactly a brilliant response either. They aren't all direct insults, true, but none of them are particularly respectable.
 

Madara XIII

New member
Sep 23, 2010
3,369
0
0
The_Scrivener said:
I didn't compare the two people. I compared two situations where the greater issue was of obviously greater importance than nitpicking the pointless details/minutia that people get caught up in.
Regardless, her latest Tweet just seems to seethe with inflammatory material as if she's trying to spark something. Why do we give this Twat attention anyways?

I don't particularly care for her and her horrible representation of feminism. Christ almighty, half the time she utters anything about sexism she makes herself look like the stereotypical feminist most misogynistic males paint them out to be.

It's just painful to watch.

And in response to Anita's idiotic tweet totally disregarding Mirror's Edge 2

 

DementedSheep

New member
Jan 8, 2010
2,654
0
0
I guess she missed Mirrors edge 2 being unveiled then?
You can still criticism her. Unless your criticism is "there is no misogyny in the gaming community at all" this doesn't really invalidate anything. It just shows once again that people are horrible.

Legion said:
Scummy reponses from scummy people (the twitter trolls), but it's pretty tiresome how she pretends its because she is a woman criticising games, rather than an issue people have with her specifically as an individual. She has a persecution complex of an almost astounding degree, or else she is just a very clever and manipulative person.

People go onto twitter and tell celebrities that they wish that their kids would get cancer and other nasty things, it doesn't "prove" anything at all. Except that anonymity causes people to act nastily, which most of us have known for years.

She is completely blinkered by sexism and is incapable of looking at anything beyond it.

Or to put it another way, if somebody such as Susan Arendt had said what Anita did, she would not have received these kinds of responses. If it was purely down to misogyny on behalf of gamers, then this kind of thing would happen to all who complain about it, not just a select few.
While I agree too some extent a lot the comments she gets are misogynistic crap aimed at woman in general. Though of course sexism is everywhere not just in the gaming community and comments and twitter seem to attract the worst of people.
 

The-Traveling-Bard

New member
Dec 30, 2012
228
0
0
Vrex360 said:
The-Traveling-Bard said:
No, I don't think she is target in a certain way just because she's a female. Why? Because people are generally dickheads.

As for the plot device bullshit..

"I didn't interpete it that way, I saw it more as her saying that what should have been a relationship comes across more like a maculine possession thing largely because the female characters are given so little screentime or presence that they barely register as much more than a plot device."

I didn't read past this. Why?

IMAGINATION.
You seriously need everything spelled out for you to understand that people love each other?
Do you need a complex story to understand that two people love each other?
No. You fucking don't.

The idea of LOVE isn't good enough for you to go save someone? You really need a 6 hour back story?

Which is kinda funny because she uses Max Payne as an example that already have like 5 games that explained everything and why he does the shit that he does. So again .FAILURE ON ANITA!

This is almost like saying the opening stage of Skyrim is bad because they didn't detail why you got arrested. Therefor the game is... "ism" against criminals. Now the reason why I put a ISM in their is the symbol of that word.

Let's say Skyrim main character black. (You had no choice.)
Anita would most likely say the game is Racist because of some society ways people view black people as thugs, blah, fucking blah.

... What is she missing here?
1. Context.
2. Imagination.

Games are *not* in-depth-complicated-on-the-scale-of-game-of-thrones-books. Seriously can you imagine how much money, and time it will build a game that the plot size is exactly as big as the Game Of Throne series? Even the HBO series can't do it and that's why the killed off several characters within the tv show that they had continue plots within the books. Do you even realize HOW FUCKING BIG GAME OF THRONES REALLY IS?! It has got to be in at least the top 5 most complicated novels out there.

They are *not* meant to be story driven. (Well some of them aren't) That's why we call them GAMES, not books. Because it's about the GAME not the story. (Unless it's RPGS. Then yeah.)

I think Bioware writer stated how she was fed up about how story's gets treated in the video game industry and although I agree with her. I do wish video games did have more complicated stories in them, but look at the market right now.

60-80 millions dollars are being bumped into Triple A gaming and 50 million of it is spent advertising the damn thing.
The average game isn't meant to be about the story. They're just meant to be a "plot device" and when you argue something that's just there just to push the game along without any hidden underlying messages. You're quite fucking fool and a idiot. You're arguing about something THAT DOESN'T EVEN EXIST.

Again Anita has NO concept of context and from you stated has no imagination at ALL while she playing a game to think of a back story for herself and why she cares about this loved one.

And by your first paragraph alone also states she has no concept how to design a story.

Edit: Wow what is with me tonight and not snipping things correctly? Sheesh.
 

Legion

Were it so easy
Oct 2, 2008
7,186
0
0
DementedSheep said:
While I agree too some extent a lot the comments she gets are misogynistic crap aimed at woman in general. Though of course sexism is everywhere not just in the gaming community and comments sections and twitter seem to attract the worst of people.
That's because she is a woman, and misogynist comments are therefore far more insulting. Telling her to "stop whining and grow some balls" isn't going to have the same impact as it might on a guy for example. People use insults to hurt, therefore they choose the ones that are going to hurt the most.

It doesn't make those comments any less misogynistic, but it doesn't prove anything in regards to how sexist gamers are as a whole. There are tens of millions of them after all, so in terms of percentage we are talking 0.0(a lot of zeroes)1% of gamers who are expressing these kind of views, and very few express this kind of view to people who aren't like Anita, which suggests it's a personal attack rather than an "anti-women" ideal.

It doesn't make it any better, but she uses these things to try and prove a point, and her point is as valid as saying football (soccer) fans are racist, violent thugs due to the chanting and fighting that goes on. Sure there are many, but they are an absolutely tiny minority when it comes down to it. Yes those people are a problem, but her argument would be that "football fans" are a problem, as if it's a cultural thing as opposed to "some people are just nasty".

If she just said "Misogynist responses as usual" and linked them, I'd be completely on her side, but as always she has to try the "male privilege" and "male entitlement" line of argument, which is where her bias shows, and why I find myself at odds with her opinions.
 

Tr3yk1ng

New member
May 20, 2013
22
0
0
Doesnt mirrors edge have a female protaganist.Beyond two souls also has a female protaganist i think.So anita is an idiot.
 

GladiatorUA

New member
Jun 1, 2013
88
0
0
I think people are misunderstanding something. She did not feed the trolls. She is the troll. And a good one. Raging and insulting is not trolling. At least it wasn't.
The aim of trolling is to get an inadequate response. And she achieves it with just one message on twitter. Fascinating.
Using all the hate of stupid people to prove her point even more. Smart move.
I don't understand what there is to rage about. For a smart person. She has a point(doesn't mean she is always right), she stirs up the bowels of the internet, and maybe, as a result, we will see less cringe-worthy plots in games. Until I see some negative effects from her activity, I support her idea.
And it's fun to observe internet drama. Especially if she knowingly puts herself in front of the hate train and manages to gain momentum from it.

And it's not like she went for this low-hanging fruit.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=P75YQHFnyKY
Not particularly offensive, but fake, tasteless and retarded, considering all of the feminist backlashes of the last 6 months.

Tr3yk1ng said:
Doesnt mirrors edge have a female protaganist.Beyond two souls also has a female protaganist i think.So anita is an idiot.
Mirror's Edge 2 was at EA's conference. Beyond Two Souls was at Sony's. She talks about Microsoft's conference.
 

DementedSheep

New member
Jan 8, 2010
2,654
0
0
Legion said:
DementedSheep said:
While I agree too some extent a lot the comments she gets are misogynistic crap aimed at woman in general. Though of course sexism is everywhere not just in the gaming community and comments sections and twitter seem to attract the worst of people.
That's because she is a woman, and misogynist comments are therfore far more insulting. Telling her to "stop whining and grow some balls" isn't going to have the same impact as it might on a guy for example. People use insults to hurt, therefore they choose the ones that are going to hurt the most.

It doesn't make those comments any less misogynistic, but it doesn't prove anything in regards to how sexist gamers are as a whole. There are tens of millions of them after all, so in terms of percentage we are talking 0.0(a lot of zeroes)1% of gamers who are expressing these kind of views, and very few express this kind of view to people who aren't like Anita, which suggest its a personal attack rather than an "anti-women" ideal.
Stuff like "maybe when woman start being capable like men" doesn't strike me as using misogyny as personal attack to be insulting, its just seems like misogyny in genral and I do see this often when views like Anita's are bought up, not just to her.
But yeah, you get this shit everywhere not just gaming and it isn't even indicative of sexism in society as a whole. Those with extreme negative views are always the loudest and most memorable group so the problem ends up looking far far bigger than it is