THQ: Homefront Is Not a 71

Recommended Videos

le picklez

New member
Jun 16, 2010
132
0
0
Dr. McD said:
le picklez said:
Rebelcommander6 said:
I'm all for video games as an art form but if Homefront is considered art, then Burger King is gourmet food. I went into the game buying all of the marketing for it to that point and what I saw was a plot so generic that it was boring, villains so cardboard thin they were unrealistic, and the patriotic bravado was so force fed that it actually insulted me (I love my country but still) I was looking forward to something that would show what it was like to fight a guerrilla war against an occupying force, making all of my decisions count, not some linear, predictable and boring mess that only took 5 hours to beat.
THEYRE PUTTING MY PEOPLE IN A HOLE????? LET ME ENDANGER THE ENTIRE MISSION UP TO THIS POINT BECAUSE THE IDEA OF NON-CEREMONIAL BURIAL FOR EACH AND EVERY ONE OF THESE PEOPLE ENRAGES ME! "Sir, we're killing our own with this phosphorous" "IT'S WAR LOL". Sigh. Most annoying story ever made.
Don't forget this...

Kid: Sir, I'm hungry.

Connor: Piss off.
The sad part is I didn't even play through the whole game to find this blatant contradiction. They just didn't feel like keeping a consistent character throughout the game. This isn't art by art's standards.
 

Jumpingbean3

New member
May 3, 2009
484
0
0
I haven't played Homefront but I have seen bits of it and it just looks like a melodramatic power fantasy capitalising on Obama Era paranoia. Hardly the sort of stuff I'd classify as art. Seeing two people getting shot in front of their child is shocking and disturbing but I get the feeling it was done mainly as a CCC (Controversy Creates Cash) ploy and its hard to hold it up as art under those circumstances. But again I haven't played it myself so I'm not really the guy to ask.
 

gphjr14

New member
Aug 20, 2010
868
0
0
Scrumpmonkey said:
To be honest if it had Call of Duty; Homefront" as a title it would have got somewhere in the 80-85 range so i can see why he might me slightly annoyed but the game wasn't that great. It was basically an attempt by THQ to capture some of CoD's market, an emulation of mediocrity was what it's mission statement basically was. You aim at Cod, you get judged as CoD, and recent CoD is a 71 at best.
Case and point SOCOM. Although not released reviewers are already giving it an average of 70 +/-. Veterans are apparently disillusioned by this version seeing it as a wanna be third person COD and while I've never played a SOCOM game but it does bear several similarities to COD games when I was hoping it'd play more like Uncharted given that its third person and has a cover system.
 

acosn

New member
Sep 11, 2008
615
0
0
Opinions are funny like that.

If Modern Warfare and it's spawns hadn't been released people would have received Homefront a bit better but it's just barely anything we haven't already seen.
 

Riobux

New member
Apr 15, 2009
1,955
0
0
I think THQ has an ego that is resisting being kicked down a couple of notches.
 

Tipsy Giant

New member
May 10, 2010
1,133
0
0
Zhukov said:
Yup. He's right. It most definitely isn't a 71.

It was a miserable fucking 40.

A shameless CoD-clone without one jot of interest or originality. Just one more drip of grey water in the great river of dreary mediocrity. Not worthy of note even by the abysmally low standards of video games.

Bleh, I say. Bleh

Factual Man is full of facts.
 

Hashime

New member
Jan 13, 2010
2,538
0
0
71 is a great score for meta-critic. I normally don't seriously consider something under a 70 without a demo or personal recommendation, but a 71 is enough for me to strongly consider picking it up.
 

The_Prophet

New member
Sep 3, 2008
1,494
0
0
No, Homefront is not a 71, it's one of the worst games I've ever played and It's more a 31, and No, Homefront is not art.
 

Atmos Duality

New member
Mar 3, 2010
8,470
0
0
You're absolutely right THQ.
Homefront isn't a 71; it's worse than that.

Why? Because critics have been handing out 7s to average games for a long, long time now.
Of course, this is somewhat arbitrary; it's difficult, even futile to quantify subjective matter (and part of why I hold incredibly buggy games much lower regard than most).

But hey, if you want to talk numbers, try this: It's a 4 hour long game.
Four. Fucking. Hours.
 

blackdwarf

New member
Jun 7, 2010
606
0
0
yeah, you can't apply math to art, but was homefront art then?

adn this is what i really hate about reviews these days. when the game is meh, its get a 7. when i was school and got a 7 (didn't work with letters) i was f-ing happy, or technaly: had 70% of the test good. that is great. but when a game gets 7 its ok. what the hell?
 

Duffeknol

New member
Aug 28, 2010
897
0
0
Ralen-Sharr said:
Single player campaign was WAY too short. If they want to double or more it's length then they'll have earned a better score.
No, it was too long. After one hour, waiting for scripted pathblocking event #8885858329 to stop bugging out on me, I just wanted this stupid game to be over.
 
Feb 13, 2008
19,429
0
0
rolandoftheeld said:
I love the juxtaposition of "Our goal is always to get a perfect score" and "You can't apply math to art." Numbers aren't important at all! Unless you give us GOOD numbers, that is. Then they're the only thing that matters.
Excellent first/second post. Full marks...oh...that was ironic.
 

Mandalore_15

New member
Aug 12, 2009
741
0
0
I'm pretty glad it got mediocre scores, means it'll be in the bargain bin sooner rather than later and I can pick myself up a copy for £10-15. =D
 

Desert Tiger

New member
Apr 25, 2009
846
0
0
1 - 70% shouldn't be a bad thing
2 - If this game was any more bland and average, it would taste like vanilla flavoured meat and potato.
3 - Contrary to popular belief, not all videogames are art. In the same way that not all movies are art.
4 - Fuck you. Go and study some Bioware games and maybe come up with an innovative "door opening button".
 

stormtrooper9091

New member
Jun 2, 2010
506
0
0
oh cry me a river, it's an overhyped mediocre game that only sells because the genre is hip nowadays. Can't apply math to art? Ever heard of Fibonacci's numbers boyo
 

beema

New member
Aug 19, 2009
944
0
0
I never look at Metacritic. I am not buying Homefront based on every person I've heard talking about it calling it a giant steaming pile of shit.

Hasn't it already been established that most of those sales were from preorders based on promises they never followed through on?

Desert Tiger said:
2 - If this game was any more bland and average, it would taste like chicken.
fixed?
 

hecticpicnic

New member
Jul 27, 2010
465
0
0
Assassin Xaero said:
hecticpicnic said:
Assassin Xaero said:
It wasn't until you nurfed the online play. Way to go in dumbing it down.
Nurfed? How.
To quote myself from before (guess you missed it):

Assassin Xaero said:
WanderingFool said:
I would give Homefront an 80, not great *cough*singleplayer*caugh*, but its still fun MP wise.

Assassin Xaero said:
It wasn't until you nurfed the online play. Way to go in dumbing it down.
What did they do, exactly?
Probably easiest way to put it...
Prepatch - Like Call of Duty in hardcore mode
Postpatch - Like regular Call of Duty

Originally, people would die after a few bullets, but a lot of people complained. They nurfed the snipers (which were overpowered anyway), but they did something else that nurfed the rest of the guns. Not sure if it is lower damage or increased player health or what, but it isn't like it was prepatch.
That fine with me.It makes for better tactical play.
Although this game it probably shit anyway,so i'm gonna save up for something like battlefeild 3 or portal 2.
 

Assassin Xaero

New member
Jul 23, 2008
5,391
0
0
hecticpicnic said:
Assassin Xaero said:
hecticpicnic said:
Assassin Xaero said:
It wasn't until you nurfed the online play. Way to go in dumbing it down.
Nurfed? How.
To quote myself from before (guess you missed it):

Assassin Xaero said:
WanderingFool said:
I would give Homefront an 80, not great *cough*singleplayer*caugh*, but its still fun MP wise.

Assassin Xaero said:
It wasn't until you nurfed the online play. Way to go in dumbing it down.
What did they do, exactly?
Probably easiest way to put it...
Prepatch - Like Call of Duty in hardcore mode
Postpatch - Like regular Call of Duty

Originally, people would die after a few bullets, but a lot of people complained. They nurfed the snipers (which were overpowered anyway), but they did something else that nurfed the rest of the guns. Not sure if it is lower damage or increased player health or what, but it isn't like it was prepatch.
That fine with me.It makes for better tactical play.
Although this game it probably shit anyway,so i'm gonna save up for something like battlefeild 3 or portal 2.
Understandable, but it ruined it for me. I grew up playing games online where you die after a few bullets, and on Call of Duty 4/5, all I ever played was hardcore mode. So, them nurfing it really ruined the fun I had with it the first week.