Twilight Star Supposedly Related to Dracula

Aug 25, 2009
4,611
0
0
Meh, whole concepts flawed in my opinion. Sure he might be, but if you go by family trees I'm willing to bet there's no records that far back, and if you go by genes and 'science' then it's such an imprecise answer it often bears no relation to the reality. (Apparently my family are related to the Russian royal line for example)

Also, I don't think I'd mind seeing Robbie as an actual vampire. Maybe he could stake a nancy pretty-boy with a barge pole, all while screaming insults against Twilight, just to let us know. That's a movie I'd pay to watch.
 

ProfessorLayton

Elite Member
Nov 6, 2008
7,452
0
41
coldalarm said:
He gets paid, probably, a metric tonne of cash per film, has women lusting after him and may possibly be a big star in the future.
And he's complaining? What. A. Ruddy. Pillock.
I actually don't think he has a future in films, I really don't. When you're part of something like this, everyone is automatically going to associate him with Twilight. It's just like Michael Cera is always going to be associated with being the awkward teenager, he's going to have people always associating him with being the sparkly vampire. He won't be able to pull off any tough guy action roles or silly comedies... just bad tween romance movies. He also doesn't just have "women lusting after him," he's got teenage girls obsessing over him. The only thing is he gets paid and I'm pretty sure that's the only reason he took the job in the first place.
 

VanityGirl

New member
Apr 29, 2009
3,472
0
0
Huh, interesting... Maybe he's playing this shitty vampire to cover up the fact that he is in fact, a real vampire.
 

Mcface

New member
Aug 30, 2009
2,266
0
0
If Vlad met him, he would be so ashamed he would impale, and then eat his entrails.
 

Atmos Duality

New member
Mar 3, 2010
8,473
0
0
...Now I feel the urge to grab my whip, Trenchcoat, 2 foot Crispin and clear Glass Flask...
Then I'm going to board a plane bound for Hollywood to look for glamorous faux-emo bloodsuckers.
You're all invited to join me.
 

RanD00M

New member
Oct 26, 2008
6,947
0
0
Cowabungaa said:
PedroSteckecilo said:
But to play Dracula he'd need to pit his acting chops against Gary Oldman, Christopher Lee and Leslie Nielson... is that really wise?
And they don't even remotely live up to Max Schreck:

So imagine how terribad poor Pattinson is.
I don't think Mex counts.Seeing as how he was in Nosferatu,where he played Count Orlok.
 

crimson5pheonix

It took 6 months to read my title.
Legacy
Jun 6, 2008
36,498
3,698
118
RanD00M said:
Cowabungaa said:
PedroSteckecilo said:
But to play Dracula he'd need to pit his acting chops against Gary Oldman, Christopher Lee and Leslie Nielson... is that really wise?
And they don't even remotely live up to Max Schreck:

So imagine how terribad poor Pattinson is.
I don't think Mex counts.Seeing as how he was in Nosferatu,where he played Count Orlok.
Sarcasm? The only reason they didn't use the name was that Bram Stoker was still alive and didn't want to violate copyright laws. I think Bram still sued though...
 

RanD00M

New member
Oct 26, 2008
6,947
0
0
crimson5pheonix said:
Sarcasm? The only reason they didn't use the name was that Bram Stoker was still alive and didn't want to violate copyright laws. I think Bram still sued though...
Stoker died in 1912.Nosferatu however,was released in 1922.
 

crimson5pheonix

It took 6 months to read my title.
Legacy
Jun 6, 2008
36,498
3,698
118
RanD00M said:
crimson5pheonix said:
Sarcasm? The only reason they didn't use the name was that Bram Stoker was still alive and didn't want to violate copyright laws. I think Bram still sued though...
Stoker died in 1912.Nosferatu however,was released in 1922.
Then it was his wife. I just remember they used the names to dodge copyright because that was the only thing really changed.
 

RanD00M

New member
Oct 26, 2008
6,947
0
0
crimson5pheonix said:
RanD00M said:
crimson5pheonix said:
Sarcasm? The only reason they didn't use the name was that Bram Stoker was still alive and didn't want to violate copyright laws. I think Bram still sued though...
Stoker died in 1912.Nosferatu however,was released in 1922.
Then it was his wife. I just remember they used the names to dodge copyright because that was the only thing really changed.
Fair enough.You win this argument then I guess.If you could call it an argument,which you hardly could.
 

Lenriak

New member
Apr 15, 2009
56
0
0
Ooh, he's related to wee Vlad through the Royal Family, OOOOH, He's related to the Royals too?! lol, lets play "guess my response"
8 letters, first is B, last is T.

B._._._._._._.T