I actually don't think he has a future in films, I really don't. When you're part of something like this, everyone is automatically going to associate him with Twilight. It's just like Michael Cera is always going to be associated with being the awkward teenager, he's going to have people always associating him with being the sparkly vampire. He won't be able to pull off any tough guy action roles or silly comedies... just bad tween romance movies. He also doesn't just have "women lusting after him," he's got teenage girls obsessing over him. The only thing is he gets paid and I'm pretty sure that's the only reason he took the job in the first place.coldalarm said:He gets paid, probably, a metric tonne of cash per film, has women lusting after him and may possibly be a big star in the future.
And he's complaining? What. A. Ruddy. Pillock.
I don't think Mex counts.Seeing as how he was in Nosferatu,where he played Count Orlok.Cowabungaa said:And they don't even remotely live up to Max Schreck:PedroSteckecilo said:But to play Dracula he'd need to pit his acting chops against Gary Oldman, Christopher Lee and Leslie Nielson... is that really wise?
So imagine how terribad poor Pattinson is.
Sarcasm? The only reason they didn't use the name was that Bram Stoker was still alive and didn't want to violate copyright laws. I think Bram still sued though...RanD00M said:I don't think Mex counts.Seeing as how he was in Nosferatu,where he played Count Orlok.Cowabungaa said:And they don't even remotely live up to Max Schreck:PedroSteckecilo said:But to play Dracula he'd need to pit his acting chops against Gary Oldman, Christopher Lee and Leslie Nielson... is that really wise?
So imagine how terribad poor Pattinson is.
Stoker died in 1912.Nosferatu however,was released in 1922.crimson5pheonix said:Sarcasm? The only reason they didn't use the name was that Bram Stoker was still alive and didn't want to violate copyright laws. I think Bram still sued though...
Then it was his wife. I just remember they used the names to dodge copyright because that was the only thing really changed.RanD00M said:Stoker died in 1912.Nosferatu however,was released in 1922.crimson5pheonix said:Sarcasm? The only reason they didn't use the name was that Bram Stoker was still alive and didn't want to violate copyright laws. I think Bram still sued though...
Fair enough.You win this argument then I guess.If you could call it an argument,which you hardly could.crimson5pheonix said:Then it was his wife. I just remember they used the names to dodge copyright because that was the only thing really changed.RanD00M said:Stoker died in 1912.Nosferatu however,was released in 1922.crimson5pheonix said:Sarcasm? The only reason they didn't use the name was that Bram Stoker was still alive and didn't want to violate copyright laws. I think Bram still sued though...