Ubisoft Eyeballs THQ

Recommended Videos

lancar

New member
Aug 11, 2009
428
0
0
Dammit, not Ubithoff [http://www.escapistmagazine.com/articles/view/comics/stolen-pixels/7265-Stolen-Pixels-175-Ubisoft]...
Ugh.. Yes, better than EA and Activision indeed, but I would've liked to see Take2 make a bid instead. Valve is probably way too much to hope for, since they've always done their own thing.
 

Kazedarkwind

Inner Working Reviewer
Nov 18, 2009
119
0
0
anyone else hoping that Zenimax/Bethesda Softworks buys them out? i think it would be better than ubisoft but i personally have no problem with ubisoft. anyone but EA is okay with me
 

Akexi

New member
May 15, 2008
144
0
0
Kazedarkwind said:
anyone else hoping that Zenimax/Bethesda Softworks buys them out? i think it would be better than ubisoft but i personally have no problem with ubisoft. anyone but EA is okay with me
That would be pretty awesome honestly.
 

kburns10

You Gots to Chill
Sep 10, 2012
276
0
0
And like vultures in the desert, Ubisoft sees THQ crawling and swoops down. Can you give them A WEEK before trying to pick their carcass for meat?
 

Dogstile

New member
Jan 17, 2009
5,089
0
0
Really? People are worried about this? Ubisoft actually make good games, they'll just put their stupid drm shi-...

NEVERMIND, BACK, BACK YOU DEMONS, LEAVE DAWN OF WAR ALONE.
 

LordMonty

Badgerlord
Jul 2, 2008
570
0
0
God i hate ubisoft probally because they're french or... um i mean online passes <.< but seriously could be worse best luck for people and there jobs.
 

Korzack

New member
Apr 28, 2010
173
0
0
irishda said:
If you wanna play a fun drinking game, read these comments and take a shot every time someone says something along the lines of "Go away, Ubisoft. Oh well, it's better than Activision or EA." You'll be drunk by page 2.
Anyone still playing this game by page 3's probably got minor liver poisoning after this. I hope you're proud of yourself :p
 

snekadid

Lord of the Salt
Mar 29, 2012
711
0
0
dragongit said:
Of the three big publishers, EA, Activision, and Ubisoft, I honestly would rather Ubisoft get them. At least Ubisoft wants to try and release new IP every now and again, and they did do a nice job with current IP like bringing back Rayman, when they wern't busy with those stupid Rabids.
See, this is my thought process, but I would still rather chew glass than let ubisoft near THQ and my beloved franchises. They did fix Rayman but quite frankly, they fuck up so much else and I may actually tear up if they ruined metro or saints row<I liked 2 & 3, both deserve love>.
 

Weaver

Overcaffeinated
Apr 28, 2008
8,976
0
0
But THQ made such great PC games...
now they'll all have uplay and be only playable half the year because Ubi's servers go down every other week.
 

Sylveria

New member
Nov 15, 2009
1,285
0
0
Andy Chalk said:
Ubisoft CEO Yves Guillemot has previously expressed interest in THQ's properties. "They have good things,"
"and we want to put an end to that."
 

BleedingPride

New member
Aug 10, 2009
375
0
0
Guys ubisoft isn't evil, honestly I think they'd let THQ do it's own thing.

It could be that they're just considering lending a helping hand.
Besides, with Assassin's Creed, Splinter Cell, Prince of Persia, and (soon to be added) Watch_Dogs I don't think this is a bad thing compared to maybe EA.

Would this really be such a bad thing?
 

Rack

New member
Jan 18, 2008
1,379
0
0
With Ubisoft, EA or Activision we can expect Relic torn apart and assigned to some annualised franchise with Saints Row and maybe Darksiders the only games to remain but stripped way back and put on a yearly release schedule. We can also expect intolerable DRM from either Ubisoft or EA.

They all sound like death...
 

oliver.begg

New member
Oct 7, 2010
140
0
0
Glademaster said:
I'd kinda rather never see DoW 3 or CoH 2 than have Activision, EA or Ubisoft acquire Relic. Unless they take a complete hands off stance from Relic and let them do their thing and none of those pubs have shown any true understanding of the PC market. That said Ubisoft did improve with Rayman so if they keep that attitude up it wouldn't be too bad.
clearly you don't understand! RTS should be console first, and then ported to a PC, after all who really needs a good UI? or M&K, you just need 2 unit, in close up mode. with every other unit brought as DLC

*that was sarcasam*

Relic i think can lose the DOW license at anytime, and if it looks like a game will be truly shit, and sully the DOW name, i expect wargaming will pull the licence faster then you can blink
 

LGC Pominator

New member
Feb 11, 2009
420
0
0
Well considering Ubi have done Far Cry, AC and Splinter cell, 3 of my favourite franchises, I am quite happy with this news, frankly all of the freaking out here seems a little absurd
 

SextusMaximus

Nightingale Assassin
May 20, 2009
3,506
0
0
Well fuck.

If only this was back when Ubisoft were a genuinely good company.

LGC Pominator said:
Well considering Ubi have done Far Cry, AC and Splinter cell, 3 of my favourite franchises, I am quite happy with this news, frankly all of the freaking out here seems a little absurd
Lemme guess, console gamer?
 

-Dragmire-

King over my mind
Mar 29, 2011
2,821
0
0
Chaos Marine said:
yundex said:
Chaos Marine said:
Fuck no. Ubisoft can do jump off a cliff. DX
Why?
Every PC release they've done has been nothing but a condensed 'FUCK YOU PC GAMING COMMUNITY!'.
On the other hand I've been seeing their older games showing up on GOG. Worst case is we have to wait a while till Ubi's bullshit goes away.