Thank you. Yes. People here are saying the kid's autism is mentioned 'just for the sympathy vote', and while that is indeed possible, and Fox News was almost certainly using it as such (and if so missed the point entirely), we don't know enough to say. It's just as likely that his specific brand of autism allowed him to earn that many points legitimately.MelasZepheos said:See, that he's autistic makes me more likely to believe he wasn't cheating. Getting obsessed over things is something autistic people do, and videogames, with their clearly defined rules and ways in which to get achievements, are a pretty good outlet for autistic children in particular.
So I believe that it's entirely possible it looked like he was cheating, with a high score over a short amount of time or something, but in reality it was only possible because as an autistic he was so obsessed with getting achievements he played it too much.
At least one other person has said they are offended by the use of the 'autistic' label in this article headline, and to them I have a few things to say. First, so you're offended; so what? Then you can be offended - nothing happens. When did 'sticks and stones may break my bones' stop being relevant? Grow up, deal with it. Second, the autism label is necessary for this article; otherwise it's just some kid whining about video games. Actually let me qualify that: it's not the fact that the kid has autism specifically that makes this news, it's that the kid could potentially have earned those points legitimately (the mechanism for which being in this case autism) and would then have a legitimate beef with Microsoft. If I were an Olympic runner, and I had some weird naturally-occurring blood chemistry that gave me a statistically significant advantage, I'd be pissed if they labeled me a cheater and took my medals away. If I'd actually cheated, then by all means penalize me, but if not then it's unfair. Likewise, if this kid's autism is what allowed him to earn all those points, then it does indeed suck big time to be slandered in this manner.
So essentially, this is less "how dare they pick on the poor autistic kid" and more "Microsoft should be more careful with their draconian punishment and shaming system, because just being a statistical anomaly does not automatically make someone a cheater".
You're welcome.