Signa said:
Flying Dagger said:
the fantastic legal system
Just wait until you end up having to deal with it. I'm probably a more upstanding citizen than you are (from your own admissions) and I have ZERO faith in what my government calls "justice" because of the one time I needed to go to court. The rest of your points aren't wrong, but don't be thinking Johny Law has got your back for all your idealism.
In the four years I spent wanting to be a barrister, and the three years since then studying politics I've seen quite a lot, but on the whole the legal system here in the UK generally gets it right. (of course there has to be a margin for error and where you set the margin is important, I don't have the figures but I have heard some 20% of cases have their appeals succeed, but 80% is a fairly decent figure)
It's a shame that you think I'm not an upstanding member of society though. I'd like to think my charity work, political participation and moral beliefs would counter my occasional lapses in etiquette.
collegestudent22 said:
Flying Dagger said:
Do you know what vigilante attacks are?
This is exactly the same, except it is on the internet. That is where this road leads.
What, exactly, has the Internet done to exact this "vigilante" justice? Told some people about this guy being an asshole causing them to also dislike him? Spammed his inbox and other points of contact with angry messages? You might be right about some individuals who have sent death threats - and those INDIVIDUALS should not be doing that, and should be in court for it. But did anyone assault this guy? Destroy his property? Commit actual violence of any kind? Then this isn't really vigilante justice, and that is before getting into an argument about whether vigilantism is justified under certain circumstances or not.
I mean no offence but are you so blind as to be unable to recognise a mob?
Do you remember that kid who "declared war" on 4chan, whose life was made hell?
We are but a short time into this scenario and already I see people applauding and calling for this guys life to be ruined.
In an age of great change, we need to adapt our definitions of a lot of things.
When a company will Google you after a job application, or a relative might check up on you by doing so, or a potential friend may have a look, damage to someone's internet reputation is equivalent to property damage.
This is vigilantism, whether you choose to believe it or not.
If you still don't believe me - picture this - should his paypal account be hacked, his credit card made available for all to use, would the masses clamouring in approval of the internets actions change their tune? or would they laugh as all his money is spent?
Make no mistake - this is both mob mentality and a form of vigilantism.