The internet at it's worst. Once again the internet lynch mob has gone too far and is now embarrassing itself.
And this is the moment when PA lost any tenuous claim they might have had to the moral high ground.cthulhumythos said:image snip
it would appear gabe is enjoying this turn of events.
well, it would mean that the pain you caused is the pain you need to suffer as well (for me).Flying Dagger said:I assume (and thus risking making an ASS out of U and ME) that you would term justice as an eye for an eye. I do not agree - death is far too easy an escape, that hard time to be forced to understand what they have done is far greater. But I'm moving off point.
sadly, I must agree to this, although I think it's technically not evil/bad/wrong to try to rectify what one sees as wrong in the world. Also, or so it seems in most of the cases, if the person/mob/whatever learns why they are actually in the wrong, they try to do something about that (like all the positive reviews on the amazon site for the controller now, for example)Flying Dagger said:It is also worth remembering that in most cases vigilante justice is decided simply by the perpetrator who is the boldest of the anonymous mob mentality (like explained here) rather than centuries of amassed laws, statutes and conventions.
I know which I'd rather be judged by.
Furthermore vigilantes are more often than not completely misinformed and lacking in perspective. It is an unacceptable form of behaviour from anyone, least of all from a fan base who revel in their intellect.
Not that I'm defending the guy, but 'what ifs' are not the same as 'has done'.JenSeven said:For the people defending this guy, here's something to think about.
He represented a company that made a product designed for people and children with disabilities.
What if he treated those people with the same kind of attitude that he treated Dave with?
What if he said the same sort of things to people, children and parents of those children that he said to Dave?
What if Dave was a person that suffered from a disability like that? That he needed that controller in order to game?
Would you defend that sort of person?
No one is defending him. Everyone believes he deserves punishment. But a number of people know what the Internet mob is doing is disproportionate to the crime. I can't think of a time when a mob didn't take things too far.JenSeven said:For the people defending this guy, here's something to think about.
He represented a company that made a product designed for people and children with disabilities.
What if he treated those people with the same kind of attitude that he treated Dave with?
What if he said the same sort of things to people, children and parents of those children that he said to Dave?
What if Dave was a person that suffered from a disability like that? That he needed that controller in order to game?
Would you defend that sort of person?
Those people are maybe too intimidated by this thug to come forward. Who knowns how many others there are that have been verbally brutalized into silence by this guy.FelixG said:Well, we have two cases of him acting the same way towards two different people who asked him a question regarding the product (Nate and Dave) THEN we have testimonials from industry folk who talk about what a thug he is...Daystar Clarion said:Not that I'm defending the guy, but 'what ifs' are not the same as 'has done'.JenSeven said:For the people defending this guy, here's something to think about.
He represented a company that made a product designed for people and children with disabilities.
What if he treated those people with the same kind of attitude that he treated Dave with?
What if he said the same sort of things to people, children and parents of those children that he said to Dave?
What if Dave was a person that suffered from a disability like that? That he needed that controller in order to game?
Would you defend that sort of person?
Let's try and keep this in perspective people.
Supposition won't get us anywhere.
I would say it is highly likely he already acted this way toward numerous others.
You're probably right, but being an arse towards the disabled does not make someone any more/less of an arse unless said disability is the target of mockery.FelixG said:Well, we have two cases of him acting the same way towards two different people who asked him a question regarding the product (Nate and Dave) THEN we have testimonials from industry folk who talk about what a thug he is...Daystar Clarion said:Not that I'm defending the guy, but 'what ifs' are not the same as 'has done'.JenSeven said:For the people defending this guy, here's something to think about.
He represented a company that made a product designed for people and children with disabilities.
What if he treated those people with the same kind of attitude that he treated Dave with?
What if he said the same sort of things to people, children and parents of those children that he said to Dave?
What if Dave was a person that suffered from a disability like that? That he needed that controller in order to game?
Would you defend that sort of person?
Let's try and keep this in perspective people.
Supposition won't get us anywhere.
I would say it is highly likely he already acted this way toward numerous others.
I can see where you're coming from, but I respectfully disagree. Gabe might be a bully in this case, but he's a bully of bullies. At no point in the email exchange did he get ugly or mean spirited. He simply stated that he wouldn't allow the guy to have a booth next year and clarified his position. It was Paul who crossed the line, long before Gabe got involved. You might argue that Dave is no innocent, but compared to Paul's actions, he wasn't bad.Bostur said:I disagree. Gabe has simply gotten the means to become a bully himself and chose that path. Thats usually how people become bullies, most likely also the ones that picked on Gabe.Saltyk said:I tend to agree with Gabe here. This guy isn't sorry for what he did. He's sorry that he got caught. He's sorry that he angered one of the most powerful people in the industry that doesn't actually work within the industry. He's sorry that he is in trouble, not that he did anything wrong. And I tend to agree with Gabe about that. Feeling sorry that you are in trouble is not the same as being sorry for your actions. Gabe states that he doesn't like bullies, which is what he feels this guy is, and acknowledges that he might be one in this case, too. But at least he's a bully of bullies. Or a vampire that feeds on assholes. Whatever you like better.
At this point it seems more like personal revenge for his childhood.
I'm siding with Sicxess as well, it's a legal matter. Not a matter for an internet mob.
See, even in this he is still demeaning Dave. Calling his emails bitching and saying he fed into it a little too much. And there's the slightest hint of a threat here, too. "My name is good in this industry and I know a lot of people"? I can't read that as anything but an implied threat.From: Ocean Marketing
To: Mike Krahulik
Dec 26, 2011 at 9:46 PM
Mike I'm not trying to fight with you I'm really not , you should give me the benefit of the doubt before judging over one person's bitching . Did I feed into his emails a little bit too much yeah ok . But it's one person dude for real. No disrespect intended for you , My name is good in this industry and I know a lot of people. I'll be at CES are you going ?
Straight back to insults. Calling Gabe an idiot and calling the Penny Arcade site amateurish. Asking him to stir up a controversy (seriously he asked for this). And from an implied threat to an actual threat of a smear campaign. Why should I feel bad for this guy? Not only is he a jerk, he is getting exactly what he asked for right here!From: Ocean Marketing
To: Mike Krahulik
Dec 26, 2011 at 9:57 PM
Your spamming me you're not on a mailing list you idiot ! You sent me an email remember . Make sure you stir up a lot of controversy about us the more the better we needed some drama gets good blood flow going about the new product launch . Your sites amateur at best my son could put together a better site than yours and you run PAX ?? Wow , Ill put my marketing team on a smear campaign of you and your site and your emails , I have about 125 dedicated people to run PR , Blogs , Articles , Videos you have no clue who I am . Thanks again
I am in two minds about that.FamoFunk said:What makes me sad is the poor guys who made this controller are going to be really effected by this. And by what I've read it's actually a fantastic piece of equipment.
There's no need for the low rating on the product on Amazon and places, just because of this one arsehole.
Wow, jack cursing, that is very rare, smack him calumon!Jack and Calumon said:I have got to say, despite everything that's happened, this is my favourite story this year. This fucker got what's coming to him and Mike managed to scare the fuck out of me while I agree with him completely. Seriously, I just love this far too much than I should.
Calumon: Is this a happy ending? I can't tell. :S
Speaking from experience, such a thing tends to aggravate bullies even more.FelixG said:The really ironic part though, is that Dave is on other sites telling people to go easy on Paul.Lieju said:?You have the power Mike Please make it stop?
That just makes me laugh.
He has no idea how Internet works, evidently.
Wonder how it feels for the douche to have the person he wronged sticking up for him.
http://kotaku.com/5871400/cut-paul-oceanmarketting-christoforo-a-breakhe-probably-just-has-roid-ragevarulfic said:I find this Christoforo guy very fascinating. His behavior goes well beyond normal costumer service incompetence... this guy must have some kind of condition. I would love to know more - what's his story? What's his problem? I hope they make some kind of documentary of him.
Paul is clearly a hothead who is quick to resort to insults. But lets keep the perspective, this all started as a customer case about two controllers. Now it has escalated to something that could in theory turn out to get ugly for all parties. When someone succeeds to incite the crowd it's hard to turn back.Saltyk said:I can see where you're coming from, but I respectfully disagree. Gabe might be a bully in this case, but he's a bully of bullies. At no point in the email exchange did he get ugly or mean spirited. He simply stated that he wouldn't allow the guy to have a booth next year and clarified his position. It was Paul who crossed the line, long before Gabe got involved. You might argue that Dave is no innocent, but compared to Paul's actions, he wasn't bad.
And Paul maintained an insulting and demeaning attitude with Gabe. The most he did during the email exchange was clarify who he was and state that he would not permit Paul's company a booth at the next PAX or probably any PAX.
In the end, Gabe posted all the emails. But he removed all personal information when he did. If Paul had any semblance of decency or sense, things would not have come to this. Instead, he insulted customers, insulted the head of a convention, co-founder of a major web comic/charity and who knows what else.
Should Gabe have done it? Maybe not. But I don't feel sorry for Paul. He made his bed. Now, he can lie in it. If Gabe had tried to contact other news sources, the emails would still be published. No matter what, I feel like Gabe should have responded publicly on this. Be that publishing the emails himself or contacting other sources to get them to do so. Like it or not, doing nothing was worse than publishing the emails. He would have ignored the plea of a fellow gamer and reader of his comic. One who was being treated unfairly by a person who not only should have known better, but has an obligation to behave better.
If you ask me, having these emails published is punishment enough. I don't think anyone should do anything to Paul Christoforo personally, and I wish no harm to his family. But being able to read these emails and know what a jerk he is, satisfies me. If he loses his job over it, that is his own fault. And considering his demeanor in these emails, he deserves to. You know this is no isolated incident. Others just weren't smart enough to contact a major internet celebrity.
Like Gabe said, and I agreed. Paul is not sorry for his actions. At no point in those email exchanges does he say anything that would give you that impression.
Well, thanks for being the voice of reason. The Escapist seems content with adding fuel to the fire and tryng to shut you down with warnings.Flying Dagger said:Having already got two warnings I'm going to sum up as best I can how I feel then bow out.
Bostur said:Well, thanks for being the voice of reason. The Escapist seems content with adding fuel to the fire and tryng to shut you down with warnings.Flying Dagger said:Having already got two warnings I'm going to sum up as best I can how I feel then bow out.
Internet mentality makes me sick sometimes. Lets arm the mob with pitchforks and pretend we are neutral.
You make it sound like the site is conspiring against him. I can't recall the second instance, but the first (I think) warning that Dagger received along this thread is because he mentioned in a post that he had pirated games in the past. Even mentioning something like that in passing is a big no-no around these parts.Bostur said:The Escapist seems content with adding fuel to the fire and tryng to shut you down with warnings.