mjc0961 said:
albino boo said:
If they prove that he owns a PS3 he done for. If he owns one, then he has entered in a contract with Sony and breached it.
Uhm, no. That was never true. It was obvious that he owned a PS3. We all knew that; he couldn't crack one without owning one. But buying a PS3 doesn't mean you have entered into a contract with Sony. It's only signing up for the Playstation Network that does that.
And as Sony still hasn't sufficiently proven that he has done so (only that SOMEONE used one of his PS3s to create one; they have yet to provide proof who that SOMEONE is, so at this point it's only an assumption that it's his), he didn't do anything wrong on that front.
Come on dude, Do you really think that the Escapist has all the facts... that the article at the beginning of this thread has stated every single detail?
Fair enough, there does seem to be a degree of speculation as to the fellas whereabouts but for a law team to make these statements, they would require some kind of information to back it up.
As for GeoHotz having a PSN Account, you are not aware of what kind of information or evidence Sony can gather from a PSN Account. For example, when a moderator receives a complaint from Chump1 that Chump2 has sent a nasty message do you not think they'll not be able to see that chump1 sent a nasty message first.
They would have tools that would allow them to monitor the activity on individual PSN Accounts and would most likely have enough evidence to back up that it was him.
Finally, being a massive company with these well paid lawyers, they would know what extent they would be able to go to without breaching privacy laws.
These lawyers get paid ridiculous sums for a reason. GeoHotz never stood a chance IMO and he underestimated the resouces available to Sony on their own network!