naw, he should be raped with a sandpaper condem!Dr. wonderful said:No. That is both stupid and wrong.dagens24 said:Good. I hope he gets raped with a shiv in prison; a little ironic justice.
He should just be taken to jail. That's it.
naw, he should be raped with a sandpaper condem!Dr. wonderful said:No. That is both stupid and wrong.dagens24 said:Good. I hope he gets raped with a shiv in prison; a little ironic justice.
He should just be taken to jail. That's it.
Fawxy said:He assaulted the child again after sobering up. He's a fucked-up individual, and people are responsible for their actions EVEN WHEN THEY'RE "INTOXCITAED" [sic]. He raped a child, no amount of alcohol excuses him from this disgusting fact.Dr. wonderful said:Yes, because they're goinh to die.Fawxy said:Not done enough. That "chance of parole" thing you mentioned is fucked. The defense thinks they get justice because they see that 25-27 years and think he'll be removed from society, meanwhile he gets out after 7-10 years for "good behavior" and is right back on the streets ready to hurt another child. Fuck that.Dr. wonderful said:....Wow, good speech.Fawxy said:Oh really? Any more stupid and wrong than the fact that he raped a child?Dr. wonderful said:No. That is both stupid and wrong.dagens24 said:Good. I hope he gets raped with a shiv in prison; a little ironic justice.
He should just be taken to jail. That's it.
I said it in the other thread, and I'll say it here;
This fucker deserves nothing better than death. Anyone willing to brutally violate the basic human rights of a CHILD has no place in society and deserves to be eliminated.
Fuck him, fuck all the ******s who will come to this thread to defend him/say the incident is funny, and fuck the U.S. legal system for the fact that this guy will get off with minimal punishment.
No, I lied it was stupid. He's maybe going to get the same number of years as a guy raping a woman...while the male was drunk.
So, distract the age to 12 and 's looking at 25-27 years with a chance of parole. Oh and he have to register as a sex offender which IS instant death. Because no one going to work with him, let him live anywhere.
He's done for.
Pedophiles who get the death penalty have a 0% rate of recidivism, meaning there is absolutely no chance of them harming again. That's a fucking good number in my book.
And that an excellent way to solve our problems. Kill people who commited crimes while intoxcitaed.
fucking Brillant.
And death IS a fucking brilliant solution to me. Victim and victim's family gets closure, assailant never harms another child again. Win.
It's gaming news because it was used to harmed someone.thublihnk said:So the object used in a rape was video game related, so it's now gaming news? This legitimizes any kind of link to video games that the mainstream media might try to make with crimes like these.Dr. wonderful said:Because they have a wii-mote.thublihnk said:WHY DOES THE ESCAPIST COVER THESE KINDS OF THINGS?
AKA: If said child was raped with something else say, a Remote or beer bottle. It would of recieved no coverage here.
No! It wasn't! Gaming was almost entirely unrelated to this story. It was just a phallic object that was nearby. You think if he used the handle of a tennis racket ESPN would've covered it?Dr. wonderful said:It's gaming news because it was used to harmed someone.thublihnk said:So the object used in a rape was video game related, so it's now gaming news? This legitimizes any kind of link to video games that the mainstream media might try to make with crimes like these.Dr. wonderful said:Because they have a wii-mote.thublihnk said:WHY DOES THE ESCAPIST COVER THESE KINDS OF THINGS?
AKA: If said child was raped with something else say, a Remote or beer bottle. It would of recieved no coverage here.
You remembered That case in New york in which a Woman beat her son to death? Because he broke the Nintendo wii in his home?
It's exactly like that.
Yes, it's the same.thublihnk said:No! It wasn't! Gaming was almost entirely unrelated to this story. It was just a phallic object that was nearby. You think if he used the handle of a tennis racket ESPN would've covered it?Dr. wonderful said:It's gaming news because it was used to harmed someone.thublihnk said:So the object used in a rape was video game related, so it's now gaming news? This legitimizes any kind of link to video games that the mainstream media might try to make with crimes like these.Dr. wonderful said:Because they have a wii-mote.thublihnk said:WHY DOES THE ESCAPIST COVER THESE KINDS OF THINGS?
AKA: If said child was raped with something else say, a Remote or beer bottle. It would of recieved no coverage here.
You remembered That case in New york in which a Woman beat her son to death? Because he broke the Nintendo wii in his home?
It's exactly like that.
I'm curious, what is the 6 letter word that is so bad you needed to censor it from your "fuck" filled tirade?Fawxy said:This fucker deserves nothing better than death. Anyone willing to brutally violate the basic human rights of a CHILD has no place in society and deserves to be eliminated.
Fuck him, fuck all the ******s who will come to this thread to defend him/say the incident is funny, and fuck the U.S. legal system for the fact that this guy will get off with minimal punishment.
The existence of the Nintendo Wii was not why this child got raped.Dr. wonderful said:Yes, it's the same.thublihnk said:No! It wasn't! Gaming was almost entirely unrelated to this story. It was just a phallic object that was nearby. You think if he used the handle of a tennis racket ESPN would've covered it?Dr. wonderful said:It's gaming news because it was used to harmed someone.thublihnk said:So the object used in a rape was video game related, so it's now gaming news? This legitimizes any kind of link to video games that the mainstream media might try to make with crimes like these.Dr. wonderful said:Because they have a wii-mote.thublihnk said:WHY DOES THE ESCAPIST COVER THESE KINDS OF THINGS?
AKA: If said child was raped with something else say, a Remote or beer bottle. It would of recieved no coverage here.
You remembered That case in New york in which a Woman beat her son to death? Because he broke the Nintendo wii in his home?
It's exactly like that.
That case in New York would of NEVER been covered here if it wasn't for the fact of why the child died.
Same goes for this one.
BTW on the ESPN: That would of been an Baseball bat. And there is good chance it would aired on ESPN.
That is a cruel, primitive way of thinking of things. People who commit crimes should not be tortured or killed, if you don't see what's wrong with what you're saying, you're just as bad as he is.Fawxy said:Oh really? Any more stupid and wrong than the fact that he raped a child?Dr. wonderful said:No. That is both stupid and wrong.dagens24 said:Good. I hope he gets raped with a shiv in prison; a little ironic justice.
He should just be taken to jail. That's it.
I said it in the other thread, and I'll say it here;
This fucker deserves nothing better than death. Anyone willing to brutally violate the basic human rights of a CHILD has no place in society and deserves to be eliminated.
Fuck him, fuck all the ******s who will come to this thread to defend him/say the incident is funny, and fuck the U.S. legal system for the fact that this guy will get off with minimal punishment.
Oh, well I kind of assumed from the article that the 26 year old was a relative or family friend, crashing on the couch because he's out of work (something like that)... kid of the family has a sleep-over with his friends... article said they started "taunting" the (drunk) 26 old. Which honestly, I would *never* have done at that age. That's just asking for a beat down.Sixcess said:What game were they playing?
Only it'd be funny if this sparked some kind of "Ban Kirby" media frenzy.
Um... anyway... the weirdest thing about this (other than the whole 26 year old at 12 year old's sleepover thing... what was he? Lodger? Family friend? Inquiring minds want to know...) has to be how pre-meditated this was. I mean I've never tried it, but pushing a Wii controller up... there... would require... I dunno... it just doesn't seem like something you'd do spontaneously...
I'm confused.