well, the the escapist was just attacked.

Metalix Knightmare

New member
Sep 27, 2007
831
0
0
QuietlyListening said:
If you don't have proof, wild accusations work just as well. I like it.
Not really WILD accusations given that the antis have a bad habit of Doxxing people and would have a vested interest in shutting up one of the few places that actually allows Gamer Gate discussions.

It's more assumptions based on what all is known.
 

RICHIERICAN

New member
Sep 18, 2014
31
0
0
Here's a thought that the site was doing some simple maintenance web sites and forums are known to do that from time to time!!
 

ElMinotoro

Socialist Justice Warrior
Jul 17, 2014
113
0
0
Ultratwinkie said:
And the kicker: The only one bringing up Zoe is the anti GG crowd and the derailers. In the gamergate thread, mentioning zoe is banned.
I guess someone better quickly go ban all the people using "literally who"
 

ThunderCavalier

New member
Nov 21, 2009
1,475
0
0
And this is why I decided to opt out of the whole GamerGate scandal.

It was just "This is far bigger than I know to commentate on," but with a side dash of "There's just too much that either annoys me or confuses me about this issue that I'd rather just sit out on it and let it die."
 

Jux

Hmm
Sep 2, 2012
868
4
23
Ultratwinkie said:
jesus christ the amount of confirmation bias on display.
Hold up a mirror there.


We call them SJWs because they don't care about minorities. Of all the people who claimed to "protect" me from the evil white man it all turned out to be just another ego stroker. They don't actually care for equality.
And you're the judge and jury when it comes to others' intentions? I'm not saying there aren't people out there that do it just for their own ego, but you're basically leveling this pejorative at anyone you disagree with.

But hey, as long as the celebrity defense squad defends the helpless famous white man (who gets shit for free) from the irrational "mob" of minorities its all okay right?
Who is being defended? So there's no white guys in gamergate?

The more you stay in the past, the more you defend the toxic nature of game journalism. Gamergate has moved way past Zoe and moved way past the old scandal you looked at.
So because I'm against gamergate I must be for corrupt journalists? Just another sad example of that 'us v them' attitude on display. But don't let me stop you, keep right on truckin there.

And the kicker: The only one bringing up Zoe is the anti GG crowd and the derailers. In the gamergate thread, mentioning zoe is banned.
Of course, by this point you've all moved on to the 'real enemy', those evil SJWs. A movement born out of misogyny and slut shaming, cutting it's teeth on defeating all those progressives.

But hey, defend toxic game journalism from the evil diversity at any cost right?

Gamergate has moved on from quinn. Its time you did too.

If you keep only seeing gamergate as a Zoe Quinn issue then you dismiss the other outrage, especially the racial outrage, because its more convenient for you.
Of course, now that you've gotten what you need out of her, it's time to move on and attack the next windmill.
 

Thorn14

New member
Jun 29, 2013
267
0
0
Oh you mean conspiracies like that chat log that "proved" 4chan was behind EVERYTHING despite the full logs showing that quotes were cherry picked in a tiny ass irc chat that wasn't related to 4chan at all?
 

Ilovechocolatemilk

New member
Mar 26, 2009
138
0
0
BobDobolina said:
Not strange at all. Conspiracy theorists are nothing if not prolific.
It's also a strange way of describing mountains of evidence to the contrary, such as:

http://www.breitbart.com/Breitbart-London/2014/09/17/Exposed-the-secret-mailing-list-of-the-gaming-journalism-elite
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9MxqSwzFy5w
http://www.forbes.com/sites/erikkain/2014/09/04/gamergate-a-closer-look-at-the-controversy-sweeping-video-games/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fF8su7GTGvw
http://yiannopoulos.net/2014/09/19/gamejournopros-zoe-quinn-email-dump/
http://www.brightsideofnews.com/2014/09/19/inside-the-secret-world-of-games-journalism/
http://adland.tv/adnews/gamergate-insulting-consumers-shrinks-market/1027025677
https://medium.com/@ryansmithwriter/a-lack-of-critical-distance-b021f84ca0c3

And so forth
 

Ilovechocolatemilk

New member
Mar 26, 2009
138
0
0
BobDobolina said:
That you think there's anything of substance at any of those links -- let alone "mountains of evidence to the contrary" -- is exactly why you're sinking deeper into futile frustration while the world dismisses you.

I can also see some of you have decided to go back to whining about "shills" and "you don't understand the movement" on /v/. That should work out well for you. Do keep it up.
I've brought loads of evidence to the table. You've brought none. You have neither logically refuted said evidence nor have you presented any evidence for your side. If this were a court of law, it's abundantly clear which side has won. Hint: it's not your side.
 

jklinders

New member
Sep 21, 2010
945
0
0
RICHIERICAN said:
Here's a thought that the site was doing some simple maintenance web sites and forums are known to do that from time to time!!
Someone was not following the thread (not that I blame you). The site owner has already confirmed that it was a DDoS. It does not get to be any higher authority than that.

Might want to make sure your posts are a little longer. there are rules against low content posts as anyone who wants to be a member of this community would know.
 

Jux

Hmm
Sep 2, 2012
868
4
23
Ultratwinkie said:
Okay so its okay for you to question people's intentions but when I do it to your side its a huge problem?
Nice try, but I haven't painted your entire movement as misogynistic assholes, nor do I lob pejoratives with abandon at anyone who disagrees with me. Second, for all the talk of 'SJWs not caring about minorities', I have seen very little in the way of evidence that as a group, pro social justice people don't care about minorities, or are racist, or any of the other accusations they have had lobbed against them. On the other hand, I have already laid out evidence multiple times why I see many in your movement as duplicitous. Third, answer me honestly, was there ever a point in our PMs where I questioned your intentions personally?


Really? And you're talking about mirrors here?
I most certainly am.

You talk about how we are just here to attack random defenseless journalists, but when I say those journalists dont give a shit about what they preach you suddenly cop a huge hissy fit about doubting people's intentions.
When have I ever accused you of attacking random defenseless journalists?

Gamergate is against corrupt and intolerant journalists.
That's the claim anyway. And I'm sure many of you are. But that message seems to get polluted when you derail yourself talking about 'SJWs'. What do 'SJWs' have to do with journalism?

To cop an attitude over it is to cop an attitude that someone is calling out toxicity. You can second guess all you want but thats what Gamergate is.

Nice to know its only okay when you do it. Just because.
For all the talk about 'SJWs' and their fake moral highground, you seem to have taken a page right out of 'their' playbook.
 

jklinders

New member
Sep 21, 2010
945
0
0
Ilovechocolatemilk said:
BobDobolina said:
That you think there's anything of substance at any of those links -- let alone "mountains of evidence to the contrary" -- is exactly why you're sinking deeper into futile frustration while the world dismisses you.

I can also see some of you have decided to go back to whining about "shills" and "you don't understand the movement" on /v/. That should work out well for you. Do keep it up.
I've brought loads of evidence to the table. You've brought none. You have neither logically refuted said evidence nor have you presented any evidence for your side. If this were a court of law, it's abundantly clear which side has won. Hint: it's not your side.
The email dump provided by Milo alone was very informative. The amount of pressure Tito was getting to censor the debate was appalling. Polygon never had my traffic to begin with, now that I see what a pro censorship prat their owner is I have no intention of ever giving them any. Tito and Archon both have shown a lot of class and honor in allowing debate here. They need to be applauded.
 

CrazyCapnMorgan

Is not insane, just crazy >:)
Jan 5, 2011
2,742
0
0
RICHIERICAN said:
Here's a thought that the site was doing some simple maintenance web sites and forums are known to do that from time to time!!
And normally, when The Escapist does so, they have a message that says "Down for maintenance". Usually, this happens once a week at 3am, or sometime near then. I've experienced this many times, being I'm more of a night person. No such notice or warning occured, at any time, during the hiccups experienced. Also, given the events of a couple days past, it is better to be cautious and ask questions when such hiccups occur, given the malicious nature that surrounds the entirety of GamerGate. It is with those things in mind that I am more apt to call it an attack rather than site maintenance. The staff would also usually report on social media, such as Twitter, if The Escapist was to undergo unscheduled maintenance to let users know and allay fears and future questions.