Um... strawman? My post wasn't even close to that. I was questioning what evidence you had to support your claims. Your whole "Pearl Harbor" statement appears to be nothing but circumstantial ad hominem because you're offended by my questioning and think I take a "side" in this matter.Witty Name Here said:Way to try to strawman the argument. You post right there is the equivalent of saying "Pearl harbor? PFffffffft, people making a big deal over some shipping incident or another".
I see. I missed those notes from the SJW Corp. about the impending attacks. My bad.It's outright stating, quite clearly, that the Social Justice Warriors are desperate as all get out. Before any of this began, it said that there were hacks planned for GG supporters, doxxing of the major figures in the movement.
And what do you know, now we have people being fired and getting death threats from zealous Social Justice Warriors. Now our site has been attacked by them, and the same people who were screeching so loudly about how Gamergate is based in misogyny and how a few comments from random people justify painting the hole movement are whimpering and murmuring "No guys, I'm serious, we n-need more evidence."
Also, sorry if I can't take that "proof" of SJW wrongdoings seriously. The first image doesn't contain any proof at all, unless you count someone blaming their circumstances on "SJWs" as fact. He makes a slanderous comment blaming a nebulous, faceless, imaginary ideology for him losing his job, and something down below stating that he lost his job. Where is the solid, causal evidence linking the two?
As for the second image, again, what's the context? Someone got a message from someone else threatening them to stop talking about GG. Who got the message and who sent it to them? If a homeless person wrote me a note saying that they know my address in Thailand and they're going to permanently silence my concubine, I wouldn't take that note seriously. If I posted it online, I wouldn't expect anyone else to take it seriously either, much less imply that it's evidence of an international terrorist plot.
Besides, his statement is totally false: my second address and my concubine are in Rio.