Well, the Warcraft movie is a bit rubbish.

Recommended Videos

IamLEAM1983

Neloth's got swag.
Aug 22, 2011
2,578
0
0
wizzy555 said:
I think you'll find that Ian Holme monologues the "Concerning Hobbits" descriptions over the visual scenes. So you are told who the Hobbits are very explicitly.

Of course they used the device of him writing a book, but still.
Right, I must've misremembered that.

Still, it could've been much worse. The narration's fairly succinct, we're shown the exact specifics of Hobbits and their culture with a few lines - and that's it. I'd say Peter Jackson's been pretty graceful with exposition, on average.
 

TheMigrantSoldier

New member
Nov 12, 2010
439
0
0
From the trailers and footage that I've seen, I can tell that they were taking the story too seriously. Warcraft isn't Lord of the Rings or Game of Thrones. It's cheesy, over-the-top and light-hearted with a somewhat serious story in the background, down to the individual quotes of the units ("Me no sound like Yoda! Do I?"). If you treat it as anything but, it's a pretty generic fantasy setting.
 

major_chaos

Ruining videogames
Feb 3, 2011
1,313
0
0
So I finally went and saw it and I don't really get rock bottom score from critics and venom from fourmites. Sure its not LoTR by any stretch and I wouldn't call it a great movie, but it was competently executed and both my huge WoW nerd sister and my mother who has zero knowledge of the franchise walked away saying they enjoyed it. Honestly I think it's biggest weakness was being about the least interesting section of the lore. A WC3/Frozen Throne movie would be much more interesting just by virtue of having cooler events to work with (pun not intended).

I would sure as hell rather sit through Warcraft's 6.5/10 somewhat unique high-fantasy a second time before I would see any of the high profile dreck the theater was advertising. When my other choices are The Conjuring 2 (yawn. Remember when horror movies at least had memorable antagonists?) Alice: through the looking glass (go away Tim Burton, you have lost any talent you may have had) and Now You See Me 2(or I could watch The Italian Job while someone sticks fishhooks in my dick because that would hurt less) I have absolute confidence I chose correctly.
 

Samtemdo8_v1legacy

New member
Aug 2, 2015
7,915
0
0
major_chaos said:
So I finally went and saw it and I don't really get rock bottom score from critics and venom from fourmites. Sure its not LoTR by any stretch and I wouldn't call it a great movie, but it was competently executed and both my huge WoW nerd sister and my mother who has zero knowledge of the franchise walked away saying they enjoyed it. Honestly I think it's biggest weakness was being about the least interesting section of the lore. A WC3/Frozen Throne movie would be much more interesting just by virtue of having cooler events to work with (pun not intended).

I would sure as hell rather sit through Warcraft's 6.5/10 somewhat unique high-fantasy a second time before I would see any of the high profile dreck the theater was advertising. When my other choices are The Conjuring 2 (yawn. Remember when horror movies at least had memorable antagonists?) Alice: through the looking glass (go away Tim Burton, you have lost any talent you may have had) and Now You See Me 2(or I could watch The Italian Job while someone sticks fishhooks in my dick because that would hurt less) I have absolute confidence I chose correctly.
My beef is on the acting especially some of the human characters should have at least Emoted better.

Watching it sometimes I tried to listen to what they are saying but the Human actors are so soft spoken and stoned face with the exception of Travis Fimmel's Lothar in some scenes.

I was like "Come on Emote!!! Ham it up"

Heck even the most boring cinematic in Warcraft 3 had better acting and Emoted with clarity.


Compared to this:


Yes I know the above is complete animation but it is something that can be recrated in Live Action.
 

ZeD [taken 0]

New member
Apr 21, 2012
72
0
0
Hawki said:
Silentpony said:
I could have sworn Gamora daughter of Thanos was half Orc and half Blood Elf. 'cause Orcs have never encountered humans before and she's like 30. And she can't be part draenei because she looks nothing like an aqua velva Klingon goat.
And at one point Orgrim and Durotar were chatting about how much they missed hunting Blood Elves through the woods.
They say "blood elks," not blood elves.
Blood dogs.

Anyhow, I think the movie was pretty good. It had some severe pacing issues, but that's probably because he had to cut about 40 minutes from the movie fairly recently before the cinematic release.
I expect the extended version to do a Kingdom of Heaven and become fantastic.

To those who wonder about Garona's half-human shenanigans, Medivh talks about how he traveled to another world, met a woman, and they had some forbidden love.
Boom, Garona is Medivh's daughter.

TheMigrantSoldier said:
From the trailers and footage that I've seen, I can tell that they were taking the story too seriously. Warcraft isn't Lord of the Rings or Game of Thrones. It's cheesy, over-the-top and light-hearted with a somewhat serious story in the background, down to the individual quotes of the units ("Me no sound like Yoda! Do I?"). If you treat it as anything but, it's a pretty generic fantasy setting.
Warcraft has always been very serious (moreso prior to WoW).
Whatever happens with individual units during gameplay, like when you click on the repeatedly, isn't canon.
Warcraft is what you see in the cinematics, and they're straight up serious.
 

Hawki

Elite Member
Legacy
Mar 4, 2014
9,651
2,183
118
Country
Australia
Gender
Male
ZeDilton said:
To those who wonder about Garona's half-human shenanigans, Medivh talks about how he traveled to another world, met a woman, and they had some forbidden love.
Boom, Garona is Medivh's daughter.
Yeah, that's my guess as well. Which is a boon, because that pretty much rules out Med'an, unless Blizzard wants things to get REALLY awkward. 0_0

Oh, and kudos for another fellow Kingdom of Heaven fan who enjoys the extended cut.
 

happyninja42

Elite Member
Legacy
May 13, 2010
8,577
2,994
118
I thought per the lore Garona was half human half draeni? At least that's what a friend of mine who has played WoW more recently than myself said.
 

Hawki

Elite Member
Legacy
Mar 4, 2014
9,651
2,183
118
Country
Australia
Gender
Male
Happyninja42 said:
I thought per the lore Garona was half human half draeni? At least that's what a friend of mine who has played WoW more recently than myself said.
Original lore, yes. However, the movie is in its own continuity.

I've seen some claim that the movie Garona is definitively half-orc, half-human, but I can't say for sure. It's confirmed that in the movie, her mother was an orc. It is, however, implied that Medivh is her father, that he somehow visited Draenor before the opening of the Dark Portal.

Edit: Huh. Checked Wowpedia, apparently the novelization confirms that Medivh is her father in the setting.
 

Cette

Member
Legacy
Dec 16, 2011
177
0
1
Country
US
I thought it wasn't terrible but damn did it suffer from the hour that's supposed to be cut out of it.

Liked the acting and the way everything looked right out of the games practicality or silliness be damned. And I was actually digging the cgi orcs.

But all of the pacing issues I've seen complained about and the way it cuts from place to place never explaining who anyone is or what the importance of the locations are must have jarring as hell for someone who doesn't already know it all.

Especially the end with Medivh which just sort of happens with no explanation. Like I get it but that's only because I read the Warcraft 2 manual 15 years ago. Coming in fresh that would have made no sense.

So like a 6/10 and a decent start if they want to do more but shit has to get tightened up for any sequels. I really want to see the extended cut to check out if the movie breathes a little better that way.

Also they wasted Clancy Brown on a character that barely ever talks. That's absolutely criminal.
 

happyninja42

Elite Member
Legacy
May 13, 2010
8,577
2,994
118
Cette said:
I thought it wasn't terrible but damn did it suffer from the hour that's supposed to be cut out of it.

Liked the acting and the way everything looked right out of the games practicality or silliness be damned. And I was actually digging the cgi orcs.

But all of the pacing issues I've seen complained about and the way it cuts from place to place never explaining who anyone is or what the importance of the locations are must have jarring as hell for someone who doesn't already know it all.
It's definitely assuming you already know the lore. And on an episode of the Co-optional podcast, Jesse Cox, who apparently hosted a premier of it with Blizzard, said they told him to specifically say "it's a movie made by fans, for fans". So, assuming that's true, (and I have no reason to doubt it), yeah that pretty much is what one would expect. I mean, I played WoW up to right before the release of Wrath of the Lich King, and even I didn't know most of that junk. Granted, most of it is the lore around WC 1, which I know nothing about. But I have a passing knowledge of the world, and I was frequently going "who is that? Why do I care? What's going on?"


Cette said:
Especially the end with Medivh which just sort of happens with no explanation. Like I get it but that's only because I read the Warcraft 2 manual 15 years ago. Coming in fresh that would have made no sense.
Correct, it made no sense to us. :) They cut out SOOOO much stuff, particularly about Medivh and his background, so that it's all just "....wait what?!?"


Cette said:
So like a 6/10 and a decent start if they want to do more but shit has to get tightened up for any sequels. I really want to see the extended cut to check out if the movie breathes a little better that way.

Also they wasted Clancy Brown on a character that barely ever talks. That's absolutely criminal.
I agree, it wasn't a terrible movie, but it wasn't a great one either. It was decently entertaining, and I had a few genuine laughs. Most of the cast were good, though a lot of the human characters were very 2 dimensional. I mostly judge a movie on how much emotional investment they pull out of me over the course of the movie. And there was really only one scene, near the end that actually gave me chills, and got me a little choked up, and it involved Durotan. The rest, I distinctly remember "I have no investment in this plot. I'm just watching it to see where it goes."

So yeah, about a 5/10, 5.5/10 for me. If it came on tv one night, I wouldn't turn away from it (unless something better was on), but I don't plan on buying the dvd of it anytime soon.
 

happyninja42

Elite Member
Legacy
May 13, 2010
8,577
2,994
118
Hawki said:
Happyninja42 said:
I thought per the lore Garona was half human half draeni? At least that's what a friend of mine who has played WoW more recently than myself said.
Original lore, yes. However, the movie is in its own continuity.
Yeah I know it's it's own continuity, I just wanted to clarify what her lineage was in comparison to the game, because I had zero idea who she was.

Hawki said:
I've seen some claim that the movie Garona is definitively half-orc, half-human, but I can't say for sure. It's confirmed that in the movie, her mother was an orc. It is, however, implied that Medivh is her father, that he somehow visited Draenor before the opening of the Dark Portal.
If she was part Draenae, wouldn't she have horns you think? And I can't remember, but didn't she say flat out at one point in the movie that she was half human? I honestly don't recall. But yes, they heavily imply in the film that it's medivh, which I was a little puzzled by, because some of what he says, makes it sound like he opened the portal for love of her. It's just...eh, very muddled.

Hawki said:
Edit: Huh. Checked Wowpedia, apparently the novelization confirms that Medivh is her father in the setting.
Well that clears up one thing at least.
 

wizzy555

New member
Oct 14, 2010
637
0
0
Happyninja42 said:
If she was part Draenae, wouldn't she have horns you think? And I can't remember, but didn't she say flat out at one point in the movie that she was half human? I honestly don't recall. But yes, they heavily imply in the film that it's medivh, which I was a little puzzled by, because some of what he says, makes it sound like he opened the portal for love of her. It's just...eh, very muddled.
You have to understand the Dranei lore has been retconned several times over the course of the years. Initially they were envisioned as something like Humans who lived on Dreanor and simply existed as an enemy the orcs had previously defeated.

Then they got redesigned to the "broken" Dranei of outland, and were just hideous mutants who presumably looked like humans before they were mutated. Then for the burning crusade Metzin redesigned them again as the uncorrupted eredar we see today.

It may be the case they were invented purely to give Garona her origin, but don't quote me on that, my knowledge only goes back to 2001.
 

tzimize

New member
Mar 1, 2010
2,389
0
0
To enjoy the Warcraft movie you need 2 things.

1: You have to be able to take ridiculous high fantasy seriously. It takes itself seriously, if you cant, you wont enjoy it.

2: Dont expect oscar material. Yeah, a lot of the dialogue is not impressive. It simply isnt. Or, as op said, the orc stuff is pretty good, the human stuff is pretty bad. Which unfortunately is pretty standard Blizzard fare :\

Another thing REALLY helps it along:

3: Be a Warcraft fan.

I've been following the series since WC1 and to me it was a joy just to see a lof of the stuff on the big screen. Some fancy magic was also cool. Again, if you cant take that seriously, it'll probably look dumb to you. I loved everything about the orcs, and the scene with Durotan and his wife in the tent was simply brilliant.

As much as I want to I'm not sure I can recommend the movie to a random movie goer...its simply too special and too specific for that. And Warcraft fan owes themselves to give it a chance though. My 2?.
 

happyninja42

Elite Member
Legacy
May 13, 2010
8,577
2,994
118
wizzy555 said:
Happyninja42 said:
If she was part Draenae, wouldn't she have horns you think? And I can't remember, but didn't she say flat out at one point in the movie that she was half human? I honestly don't recall. But yes, they heavily imply in the film that it's medivh, which I was a little puzzled by, because some of what he says, makes it sound like he opened the portal for love of her. It's just...eh, very muddled.
You have to understand the Dranei lore has been retconned several times over the course of the years. Initially they were envisioned as something like Humans who lived on Dreanor and simply existed as an enemy the orcs had previously defeated.

Then they got redesigned to the "broken" Dranei of outland, and were just hideous mutants who presumably looked like humans before they were mutated. Then for the burning crusade Metzin redesigned them again as the uncorrupted eredar we see today.

It may be the case they were invented purely to give Garona her origin, but don't quote me on that, my knowledge only goes back to 2001.
I just mean from the movie itself. The Dranei are in the movie, and they very clearly look like the ones from the game. And now that I think of it, Garona even knew their language, and Guldan didn't. So it would imply even in the movie that she has connections to them. Which is why I was puzzled. If she was half Dranei, she would likely have horns, even with the movie lore. But given how they are trying to ship her with the perpetually drunk human warrior guy (not the character, but the actor's eyes looked like he was drunk the whole time), I'm confident she's half human just for the shipping purposes.
 

wizzy555

New member
Oct 14, 2010
637
0
0
Yeah. Garona's appearance takes priority over lore consistency. That's why we have all the retconns.
 

ZeD [taken 0]

New member
Apr 21, 2012
72
0
0
wizzy555 said:
Yeah. Garona's appearance takes priority over lore consistency. That's why we have all the retconns.
Movie is its own continuity, man.
I mean, shit, they erased any possibility of a Med'an. That's a good thing.
 

lacktheknack

Je suis joined jewels.
Jan 19, 2009
19,305
0
0
BloatedGuppy said:
As the film took the Chinese box office by storm, a sequel...or set of sequels...is a distinct possibility. Hopefully they'll find a better balance between fan service and making a functional movie if that turns out to be the case.
I think you're underselling it. Currently, the domestic gross makes up less than 10% of the worldwide. The movie made back its budget the first weekend in China alone, and it's going to do fine.

Distinct possibility? The only thing in question, I think, is if the sequels will be in Mandarin or English. xD
 

Samtemdo8_v1legacy

New member
Aug 2, 2015
7,915
0
0
TheMigrantSoldier said:
From the trailers and footage that I've seen, I can tell that they were taking the story too seriously. Warcraft isn't Lord of the Rings or Game of Thrones. It's cheesy, over-the-top and light-hearted with a somewhat serious story in the background, down to the individual quotes of the units ("Me no sound like Yoda! Do I?"). If you treat it as anything but, it's a pretty generic fantasy setting.
So?

Just because its generic does not mean its not done well? Dragon Age is basically D&D, Tolkien, and Game of Thrones were put in blender, but I enjoyed the first game so much regardless because it made its world building and characters well.

And all those jokes and humor are just 4th wall breaking easter eggs that really does not happen in the actual lore and stories.

This is what pisses me off when people think of Warcraft they think its all just Leeroy Jenkins and funny quotes and 4th wall breaking references. When to me Warcraft is about the World itself and the characters and the music, and the sense of scail and epicness.

That is the meat of Warcraft to me, the jokes and 4th wall breaking references are just the cherry on the top because its Blizzard being Blizzard and this is something they do to Starcraft and Diablo aswell, but appearently that cherry is sadly what defines Warcraft to alot of people.
 

Seanfall

New member
May 3, 2011
459
0
0
I just saw it today and....I liked it. I thought it was good. I don't get what everyone's issue is.

Garona
Okay was no one paying attention when Medivh spoke to her. He more or less came out and said. 'I'm yo daddy.' Sorry if he didn't hold up a sign.

I really don't get the hate this movie is getting or the complaints about the acting. It was stiff at points but everyone had a reason for how they were acting. Really if your at all a fan of Warcraft, and I'll admit this is a movie you get more out of through being a fan. Go see it. It's no where near as bad as people are saying.