tj236 said:+1 I agree with this. Great article, and I can see where the author was trying to go, but this REALLY needs to be reworded.Dreiko said:Watch the wording on that, it's like you're saying HIV is not a real illness and people have gotten sued for less XD.Greg Tito said:linking fake medical records stating Steve Jobs had HIV just after he passed away from a real illness like cancer just shows a complete lack of respect.
He didn't need to fact check shit to know that steve didn't have HIV.Zach of Fables said:The Wikileaks thing bothers me more than the WBC. We expect the WBC to act like douches, that's how they operate. But Assange should have fact checked before he spat on Steve's grave like that.
I dont know if others pointed it out, but what greg's language is referring to here is that people were attributing a fake illness to him, when he in fact died of a real illness, which is shameful and insensitive. Not that HIV is fake, but the attribution of HIV to jobs is.Dreiko said:Watch the wording on that, it's like you're saying HIV is not a real illness and people have gotten sued for less XD.Greg Tito said:linking fake medical records stating Steve Jobs had HIV just after he passed away from a real illness like cancer just shows a complete lack of respect.
I once planned to make a statue out of clay that resembles Jesus on cross and then get some depleted Uranium^223 or Plutonium, or the any of the radioactive gold isotopes. Hide them inside the statue then ship it to them as a "gift from a believer - you are doing the right thing, may God's light radiate upon you"...imnotparanoid said:Right enough of this shit.
Forced euthenasia anyone?
I didn't mean to be aggressive towards you at all. Just askingimnotparanoid said:Hey don't shoot the messanger!Khada said:Sure, but affecting the world isn't an inherently good act. What directly good effect has the man had on the world?imnotparanoid said:I'm not a big fan but most people think he's a 'visionary' and rightly so, think how much apple has effected the world.Khada said:I don't understand why people love Steve Jobs so much. I could be mistaken, but as far as I know he hasn't done anything commemorable. Building a successful business can be just as evil as it can be good. What matters is what you do with the power/money. I know of nothing I would class as good that Steve Jobs did during his life. Correct me if I'm wrong.
I'm just saying what people are saying.
Why should he have done that? so the masses can go "oh it's just a PR stunt that doesn't count" and then go right back to bashing him?Khada said:I didn't mean to be aggressive towards you at all. Just asking
I did some research after my post and found out that Mr Jobs was pretty much against acts of philanthropy and never bothered to do anything with his money/power. I don't mean to disrespect the dead, but I do not morn his passing. I simply can't bring myself to think much of someone who finds him/her-self in such an awesome position to do good in a world that desperately needs it and yet does nothing, even with their impeding demise known to be on the near horizon.
Perhaps the question is should he care what some select people say if he knows he is doing a good thing? It would be a far cry better than doing nothing with a greater spendable wealth than the county he lived in.Aeshi said:Why should he have done that? so the masses can go "oh it's just a PR stunt that doesn't count" and then go right back to bashing him?Khada said:I didn't mean to be aggressive towards you at all. Just asking
I did some research after my post and found out that Mr Jobs was pretty much against acts of philanthropy and never bothered to do anything with his money/power. I don't mean to disrespect the dead, but I do not morn his passing. I simply can't bring myself to think much of someone who finds him/her-self in such an awesome position to do good in a world that desperately needs it and yet does nothing, even with their impeding demise known to be on the near horizon.
I absolutely agree. Those translations were all, almost certainly written by zealots and bigots, and even superstitious savages.cookyy2k said:Wow those translations are truly... bias. That book was written by people to enforce whatever law they wanted to without question, the book has since been translated by everyone and their dog to say exactly what they want. My personal favourite is the New Living Translation version, must be written by zealots and bigots.Bento Box said:Evil angel probably refers to the kind of thing that Lucifer was before he got retconned into Satan. He was originally god's accuser.arc1991 said:1:37Bento Box said:That's easy.Pyrian said:There's a significant difference between someone with very powerful enemies acting notably out of character on a quite possibly hacked service, versus someone whom nobody really cares about acting perfectly in character on the same service. If Assange were to disown that act, I would give him the benefit of the doubt. I do not think Phelps will disown hers.Delicious Soy said:I like how the condemnation of westboro is universal but still plenty of out being given to Assange. Casual biases much?
Where's the picketing funerals part?Bento Box said:The Westboro church knows its Bible.
Mat 28:19 Go ye therefore, and teach all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost.
Mar 16:15 And he said unto them, Go ye into all the world, and preach the gospel to every creature.
When the Phelps' cult pickets, they are spreading the gospel. It's proselytizing, just like they're supposed to do.
People think that they're trolling, and in a sense, I suppose that's right. They are certainly looking for attention. Ultimately, though, trolls give out just fuck with people to get a rise out of them. WBC isn't doing that. They think they're telling you the truth.
As an aside, they aren't trying to save anyone's soul necessarily, either. They're just letting everyone know that they're all going to hell. Calvinism, man.
I have to agree with the BBC guy...being gay is not one of the ten commandments and being gay is not adultery.
She also says she is an evil angel...explain please!
I ain't big on the religion thing but i do know what adultery means!
As for the ten commandments thing, fine. Slavery, child abuse and rape aren't mentioned in the big ten, either (and before you object, rape is not adultery unless the rapist is married). These things might come up later in the discussion. I'm ready for them.
Finally, on the gay part - you must be joking. [http://bible.cc/leviticus/20-13.htm]
1) No, god doesn't forgive all. The Phelps' are Calvinists, which means that they believe that God has decided, long before any of us were born, which of us are destined for heaven, and which for hell. Also, apostasy is considered an unforgivable sin in any bible you read. Un. For. Givable.arc1991 said:Doesn't god forgive all? Making that kinda silly to say "they must be put to death" as yanoo...he will forgive them? :SBento Box said:Evil angel probably refers to the kind of thing that Lucifer was before he got retconned into Satan. He was originally god's accuser.arc1991 said:Bento Box said:That's easy.Pyrian said:There's a significant difference between someone with very powerful enemies acting notably out of character on a quite possibly hacked service, versus someone whom nobody really cares about acting perfectly in character on the same service. If Assange were to disown that act, I would give him the benefit of the doubt. I do not think Phelps will disown hers.Delicious Soy said:I like how the condemnation of westboro is universal but still plenty of out being given to Assange. Casual biases much?
Where's the picketing funerals part?Bento Box said:The Westboro church knows its Bible.
Mat 28:19 Go ye therefore, and teach all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost.
Mar 16:15 And he said unto them, Go ye into all the world, and preach the gospel to every creature.
When the Phelps' cult pickets, they are spreading the gospel. It's proselytizing, just like they're supposed to do.
People think that they're trolling, and in a sense, I suppose that's right. They are certainly looking for attention. Ultimately, though, trolls give out just fuck with people to get a rise out of them. WBC isn't doing that. They think they're telling you the truth.
As an aside, they aren't trying to save anyone's soul necessarily, either. They're just letting everyone know that they're all going to hell. Calvinism, man.
1:37
I have to agree with the BBC guy...being gay is not one of the ten commandments and being gay is not adultery.
She also says she is an evil angel...explain please!
I ain't big on the religion thing but i do know what adultery means!
As for the ten commandments thing, fine. Slavery, child abuse and rape aren't mentioned in the big ten, either (and before you object, rape is not adultery unless the rapist is married). These things might come up later in the discussion. I'm ready for them.
Finally, on the gay part - you must be joking. [http://bible.cc/leviticus/20-13.htm]
And i knew that being gay was mentioned in the bible, i never said it wasn't, i was saying being gay is not adultery and isn't one of the ten commandments.
And also how is one man one women, both married...Fag sex?...As i say i aint big on religion...but, well...yeh.
in my opinion they are the biggest trolls ever, half the stuff they say is complete nonsense.