What do you call MW2?
- Thread starter Tsuki Akechi
- Start date
Recommended Videos
I think I just like arguing about CoD. The killstreaks are indeed overpowered, I will admit that I can accept Stopping Power on a sniper rifle because sniper rifles are designed for one-shot kills, but then again I rarely snipe. Juggernaut was useful indeed, especially on close-quarters classes, but you're right: it was an SP counter.distended said:
I suppose my complaint about Cold-Blooded is that it's a good perk, but using it and Ninja shouldn't render you completely invisible from an important mechanic of the game...especially when the entire team thinks it's a great idea to use them. One man with CBPro and NPro? I can handle that.
I think I just hate Stopping Power for what it does. I dare say that like Steady Aim Pro, it was designed for snipers, but somebody said "Hey, I'm gonna strap this to an M68! And to my FAMAS!"
Call of Honour: Medal of BattleDuty.
Well that's what I call any modern war game, and MW2 is no exception.
Well that's what I call any modern war game, and MW2 is no exception.
Wow, best game ever made? I only played a little of the first MW, but it only seemed a somewhat above average FPS, so either 2 is much better than one and every other game ever made or I think you're exaggerating/perhaps do not have that much gaming experience.Jester00 said:
A train wreck. Hell I played it quite a lot and managed to get to level 70.
It was just the post release work that was abysmal. The campaign while nothing amazing was like a crazy action movie at the theatres. Plot holes and a lot of suspension of disbelief but I found it ok.
The multiplayer was great on day 1. Nobody had found what the gamebreaking combos or glitches were yet. Then everybody found out what worked the best. Harrier-Chopper Gunner was on 90% of people's killstreaks. Marathon-Commando-Lightweight. Grenade launcher-claymore-OMA.
Just too imbalanced after people found out what the best combos were. They tried to fix things. Like the Akimbo dual shotguns were fixed, the Javelin suicide glitch, care package glitches...
Still that's a long list of only some of the things wrong with the game. For the biggest game release to be so flawed... just shouldn't have happened.
It was just the post release work that was abysmal. The campaign while nothing amazing was like a crazy action movie at the theatres. Plot holes and a lot of suspension of disbelief but I found it ok.
The multiplayer was great on day 1. Nobody had found what the gamebreaking combos or glitches were yet. Then everybody found out what worked the best. Harrier-Chopper Gunner was on 90% of people's killstreaks. Marathon-Commando-Lightweight. Grenade launcher-claymore-OMA.
Just too imbalanced after people found out what the best combos were. They tried to fix things. Like the Akimbo dual shotguns were fixed, the Javelin suicide glitch, care package glitches...
Still that's a long list of only some of the things wrong with the game. For the biggest game release to be so flawed... just shouldn't have happened.
I call it the game i play in place of black ops simply for the fact that it has the riot shield in it.
Seriously I had a lot of fun with that shield.........*oh the sweet memories*
Seriously I had a lot of fun with that shield.........*oh the sweet memories*
I liked the single player, I liked the co-op. Multiplayer was fun until everyone figured out where to camp and what cheap tactics to use. I call it Campfest.
Commando had its retarded uses and removing falling damage was a BS move. I LUNGE BETTER THAN A SPARTAN EVER COULD!!!Captain Placeholder said:
Combined with Marathon and Lightweight, it was a recipe for trolling.
it's not like other fps. i played battlefield 2, bc2, mw1, homefront, black ops and maaany singleplayer shooters, but mw2 is different. it's fast and full of action like arena shooters, but unlike quake n stuff mw2 is still realistic (i know that trickshots aren't realistic, but the game as a whole is). that's why i love that game.bushwhacker2k said: