God, the ignorance on display in this thread is nauseating.
First, to the idiots who keep trying to make themselves look more educated than they are by slamming others use of the term "classical": get the fuck over yourselves.
Yes, the "Classical Period" was a specific era in Western art music which lasted from approximately 1750 to around 1820. However, "Classical Music" is also a catch-all term used to refer to ALL Western art music from the Dark Ages to the present.
So yes, Einaudi's music can still be considered "classical" based on its pedigree and stylistic elements.
Second, stop calling all musical examples you allude to "songs". A "song" is a piece of music which specifically incorporates a VOICE PART (pieces which require larger voice ensembles, such as choirs are usually still not referred to as such, though).
Here, I'll break it down for the idiots:
"Poker Face" by Lady Gaga = Song
"Für Elise" by Beethoven = Not a song
Got it?
Third, to you idiots who say that classical music is "overrated", or that it's "stuffy" and just more "dead white guy" garbage: wow, just wow.
That's kind of like some idiot going on about how the latest Spider-Man comic has such an awesome storyline while dismissing James Joyce or Dostoevsky as boring crap.
Don't you morons realize that if it wasn't for Josquin des Prez, Bach, Mozart, Beethoven, Stravinsky, etc, etc just from a theory standpoint ALONE your favorite type of music wouldn't even exist?
And if someone can honestly listen to this and not be moved, congratulations: you officially have no soul:
<youtube=qSeg69d3CQ8>
First, to the idiots who keep trying to make themselves look more educated than they are by slamming others use of the term "classical": get the fuck over yourselves.
Yes, the "Classical Period" was a specific era in Western art music which lasted from approximately 1750 to around 1820. However, "Classical Music" is also a catch-all term used to refer to ALL Western art music from the Dark Ages to the present.
So yes, Einaudi's music can still be considered "classical" based on its pedigree and stylistic elements.
Second, stop calling all musical examples you allude to "songs". A "song" is a piece of music which specifically incorporates a VOICE PART (pieces which require larger voice ensembles, such as choirs are usually still not referred to as such, though).
Here, I'll break it down for the idiots:
"Poker Face" by Lady Gaga = Song
"Für Elise" by Beethoven = Not a song
Got it?
Third, to you idiots who say that classical music is "overrated", or that it's "stuffy" and just more "dead white guy" garbage: wow, just wow.
That's kind of like some idiot going on about how the latest Spider-Man comic has such an awesome storyline while dismissing James Joyce or Dostoevsky as boring crap.
Don't you morons realize that if it wasn't for Josquin des Prez, Bach, Mozart, Beethoven, Stravinsky, etc, etc just from a theory standpoint ALONE your favorite type of music wouldn't even exist?
And if someone can honestly listen to this and not be moved, congratulations: you officially have no soul:
<youtube=qSeg69d3CQ8>