creager91 said:
Racism, thats all the flag represents to me. Not trying to offend anyone here but the South seceded because of racism. I'm not saying you should be ashamed to be from those states or live in them, but to sport the flag? To me thats racism. You're flying the flag of the soldiers who fought and died so they could keep "ownership" of another human being. I know many Southerners try to say the Civil war was not really about racism and I don't know what your education has taught you, but slavery was the driving force behind the South Confederacy.
1. Yes, slavery was the driving force of the southern economy. That's why the state governments got their collective shorts in a wad when it looked like slavery was on its way out.
2. Slavery had ceased to exist in the north by that time mostly because it wasn't economically viable there. If one reviewed primary source documents; letters, newspaper editorials, and the like, one would find that the absence of slavery did not mean the absence of racism in the north.
3. The vast majority of confederate soldiers had never owned slaves, they were far too expensive. So to say that they personally were fighting for slavery isn't true.
To say that the civil war was only about slavery is only about half right. If there hadn't been disagreement over whose authority it was to deal with slavery, there would not have been a war. take the case of Brazil; they abolished slavery even later than the US, but they did so without a civil war because there was no disagreement over the authority of the national government to abolish slavery.
In conclusion, the confederate flags (yes, there were more than one), doesn't represent racism per se any more than the US flag does, and if you look at the level of racism in each country then the US flag has much more simply because the CSA only existed for ~5 years.