And as I repeat AGAIN.Teshi said:Here's the short version, since it doesn't seem you have much background on the topic of natural selection: the particular individual with the trait doesn't have to pass on their trait through their own reproduction for the trait to be passed on. The trait can be carried unexpressed by siblings and other members of the family group (whether as a recessive gene or combination of genes, or inactivate due to an absence of a triggering environmental factor). Ergo, if siblings of the non-reproducing individual are more likely to survive and reproduce due to the presence of the non-reproducing individual, they can pass the potential for the trait on to the next generation, thus trait can be selected for in a population.Abomination said:You have to explain how a homosexual passes on their biology without stepping outside the confines of being a homosexual. Remember, we are talking about a homosexuality is a NATURAL dead-end when it comes to passing on one's genetic code.
This is not about passing on "homosexuality" it is about a homosexual passing on THEIR genetic legacy. The homosexual as an INDIVIDUAL.
NOT how a homosexual passes on homosexuality.explain how a homosexual passes on their biology