1. In regard to the INDIVIDUAL'S genetic legacy? It works exactly as I say. If they don't reproduce their GENETIC legacy is not passed on because THEY DID NOT REPRODUCE. It ENDS with THEM.Teshi said:If you are thinking about it only in terms of individuals you seriously don't understand how natural selection works.
In any case, all this is on the assumption that homosexual individuals don't reproduce, which is obviously incorrect.
2. I said, and here I am repeating myself AGAIN... it is a BARRIER, not something that 100% prevents reproduction.
The only thing I was talking about was the biological part. Just that ONE individual homosexual's biological legacy. YES there are indirect affects his existence could have had upon society as a whole. But his INDIVIDUAL BIOLOGICAL legacy will CEASE unless he reproduces.chikusho said:Abomination said:We were talking about biological evolution. Not scientific development or social progress.
Aaaaand, biological evolution is based on adaptations to the environment (that is, scientific development or social progress) created by influential people. It all goes hand in hand my friend.
I understand completely that the individuals in question find males to be sexually attractive. Here's the thing, I find males to be the exact opposite of that. I find them to be sexually UNattractive... and that makes me homophobic! (apparently)I said that you are misunderstanding _an_ attraction, specifically the attraction one or both of the men are feeling towards each other. Basically your mirror neurons are putting yourself in the situation you are perceiving, and you can't make sense of what you're seeing because you find it so fundamentally baffling. A theory for you, in any case.I understand attraction very well. It seems others view distaste towards seeing something as hatred towards that very thing.
I must have quantified it enough times stating that homosexuality is not harmful to society, to individuals to cats and dogs and little babies enough times to STILL be labelled as a bigot.Must have missed that line of reasoning then. Sorry if I painted you as a bigot for something that got taken out of context.