Which country is least likely to start World War 3?

[Blatherscythe]

Well considering how fucked over Germany was at the end of the first two world wars, I doubt they're going to rush into/start WW3. Also, if there is a WW3 in this day and age, then the next shall be fought with sticks and stones.

 

[woots7]

I think im going to go with New Zealand, what with all the nuclear free stuff and flightless birds.

 

[omicron1]

wtf is Sealand?? BTW I agree with Canada

Google says... [http://www.google.com/search?q=Sealand&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-USfficial&client=firefox-a]

 

[Cogwheel]

BRB. BECOMING KING.

Great, now you made me nearly spit tea at the monitor. All your fault.

Also, I have a new away message for messenger programs, I guess. Thanks.

 

[senorcromas]

I'm gonna go with Latvia. They have too cool of a name to soil it with WWIII.

Of course, I just know the name, so...

 

[ArMartinez02]

Panama.

 

[darth gditch]

Vatican City would look very hypocritical, so, yeah.

Maybe Malta and the Knights of St. John are even less likely.

 

[blarghblarghhhhh]

and Australia is all like "wtf mate"

if youve seen the video you know its true.

 

[Canid117]

Why is Sealand being mentioned so much? Why are non of the other micronations getting some love? Like the Principality of Hutt?

 

[Stevanchez]

Switzerland
They are so hellbent on staying neutral that I'm not even sure that they have a standing army.

 

[Nova Shadows]

Switzerland
They are so hellbent on staying neutral that I'm not even sure that they have a standing army.

If memory serves me correctly, they do. Every male and female in Switzerland is recruited when they turn 18 and are in the army until...35, I believe.

 

[Rigs83]

Molassia

 

[MrJohnson]

Um, Australia?
Actually we will probably think we can take on some country like Korea then realise that we're not as strong and awesome as we think we are...

Maybe New Zealand?

OMG WAIT: SEALAND! The "country", which is really just a disused oil rig/helicopter landing pad in the middle of the ocean, doesn't have any population. Yet it still has a King and a royal family.

Sealand has a population of like thirty. It's an abandoned British sea fort.

 

[SturmDolch]

Hey, let's you and me get a pointed stick or something and become wealthy dictators!

Sure, why not. *grabs pointy stick from closet* I always knew I'd use this for something.

 

[TheRealCJ]

I'm gonna say Hutt River Province.

 

[Irony's Acolyte]

Well not taking into account all the micronations like Sealand (gotta laugh whenever I think of them), I'd say Switzerland or Bhutan. Switzerland survives by being neutral with everyone and staying out of world politics for the most part. Bhutan is from what I know a country filled with poverty. And mainly Buddhist. So those are my two.

Actually come to think of it Western Sahara probably wouldn't start a war with anyone. Considering its barely a country.

 

[Vryyk]

Switzerland.

 

[MeteorK]

Considering the main reason other countries began to take Canada seriously as a country was essentially because of how bad-ass we were in WWII (the 3rd Canadian Infantry Division pushed farther into France than any other Ally), so I wouldn't say Canada.

I would say Iceland. Iceland because its a small volcanic island with about 300,000 people, with one major city and half the country if covered by a glacier. Though they are under US protection so we'll see how that goes.

Armenia is also a possibility of not starting the War. We've been conquered left and right by so many countries/empires that at one point we just don't want to fight the world.