Emphasis mine.Super Not Cosmo said:So let me get this straight. You have a comic that was posted for the sole purpose of inciting just this type of response, because let's be honest this is nothing more than thinly veiled flamebait you know full well it is. Then you get the desired response out of people only to turn around and tell them to cut it with the exact response the material was trying to incite in the first place? If you don't want people getting angry about something and reacting in this manner then this site shouldn't put content up that was designed specifically to get people to react in just this manner to begin with.TopazFusion said:Also, a lot of you guys seriously need to chill.
Take a deep breath, and step back from your computer keyboards (or touchscreens, whichever you prefer).
Wat.Super Not Cosmo said:Honestly it seems rather disingenuous to post something that is very much meant to attack a particular group of people then turn around and tell those people that attacking and insulting people is something reserved for the site's content creators. Again, I would say that if you don't want people acting in this way then don't put up content meant to make people act in this way. It's not like these people are spontaneously acting out without being provoked. If you are going to put up content like this then it seems you shouldn't be surprised when it devolves into this very type of mess.TopazFusion said:Oh no, people are quite allowed to get as angry as they like.Super Not Cosmo said:So you have a comic that was posted for the sole purpose of inciting just this type of response, because let's be honest this is nothing more than thinly veiled flamebait you know full well it is. Then you get the desired response out of people you tell people to cut it with the exact response the material was trying to incite in the first place? If you don't want people getting angry about something and reacting in this manner then this site shouldn't put content that was designed specifically to get people to react in just this manner to begin with.TopazFusion said:Also, a lot of you guys seriously need to chill.
Take a deep breath, and step back from your computer keyboards (or touchscreens, whichever you prefer).
But it's when it reaches the point that they become so angry that they start attacking each other, throwing insults around, and breaking the rules in various other ways, THAT'S when they need to chill.
There's a difference between getting angry, and getting *rule-breaking* angry.
I'm pretty sure it's because it uses stereotypes to make a point, like every other topical comic.Agayek said:Ok, honest question here for everyone:
Why exactly is this comic offensive? What specifically about it is insulting or demeaning or whatever else that would invite such umbrage? From where I'm sitting, there's literally nothing in it to get worked up about.
Is it the put-upon white guys taking up arms against the perceived racism with vaguely defined and poorly-quantified "facts"? Is it the Zimmerman reference? Is it the fact that the black guy dies, like in every action movie ever? Or is it... the fedora?
I can't see the reason why there's 10 pages of angry replies to this, nor why the entire first page is all about how the comic is pure flamebait. I just don't see it.
Someone explain please.
What point is the comic making?lacktheknack said:I'm pretty sure it's because it uses stereotypes to make a point, like every other topical comics.Agayek said:Ok, honest question here for everyone:
Why exactly is this comic offensive? What specifically about it is insulting or demeaning or whatever else that would invite such umbrage? From where I'm sitting, there's literally nothing in it to get worked up about.
Is it the put-upon white guys taking up arms against the perceived racism with vaguely defined and poorly-quantified "facts"? Is it the Zimmerman reference? Is it the fact that the black guy dies, like in every action movie ever? Or is it... the fedora?
I can't see the reason why there's 10 pages of angry replies to this, nor why the entire first page is all about how the comic is pure flamebait. I just don't see it.
Someone explain please.
Because SCREW topical comics, amirite?
I've been thinking about that myself, and although I don't see anything that's really worth getting up in arms about, I do think the Zimmerman reference is a little too soon. I mean, whether you agree with the courts decision or not, a kid is dead and a dude was hung by the media. Nobody really 'won', and thanks to the excessive media coverage and conjecture flying around it will probably be years before anyone can dig up the raw facts for themselves and come up with a personally satisfying answer.Agayek said:Ok, honest question here for everyone:
Why exactly is this comic offensive? What specifically about it is insulting or demeaning or whatever else that would invite such umbrage? From where I'm sitting, there's literally nothing in it to get worked up about.
Is it the put-upon white guys taking up arms against the perceived racism with vaguely defined and poorly-quantified "facts"? Is it the Zimmerman reference? Is it the fact that the black guy dies, like in every action movie ever? Or is it... the fedora?
I can't see the reason why there's 10 pages of angry replies to this, nor why the entire first page is all about how the comic is pure flamebait. I just don't see it.
Someone explain please.
I KNEW it! You guys had me fooled for awhile, but I think I finally figured it out:JonB said:You seem to be laboring under the notion that the Moderators, the Forums, the Website Staff, the Website, and the People Who Make This Comic are the same people. They are not. They are all parts of a large, moving machine.
By the time I got to this post someone has probably answered it better than I can, but the serious question posed at the beginning is actually relevant to the MLP fandom.Caramel Frappe said:Why is the White Guy Beta version holding a Twilight Plushie?? How does that even apply to this comic's joke? I don't even XD
That people who jump in out of nowhere to make a fuss about the "retaliatory subjugation of whites" are irritating and bad.Moth_Monk said:What point is the comic making?lacktheknack said:I'm pretty sure it's because it uses stereotypes to make a point, like every other topical comics.Agayek said:Ok, honest question here for everyone:
Why exactly is this comic offensive? What specifically about it is insulting or demeaning or whatever else that would invite such umbrage? From where I'm sitting, there's literally nothing in it to get worked up about.
Is it the put-upon white guys taking up arms against the perceived racism with vaguely defined and poorly-quantified "facts"? Is it the Zimmerman reference? Is it the fact that the black guy dies, like in every action movie ever? Or is it... the fedora?
I can't see the reason why there's 10 pages of angry replies to this, nor why the entire first page is all about how the comic is pure flamebait. I just don't see it.
Someone explain please.
Because SCREW topical comics, amirite?![]()
As far as I can tell, it can basically be summarized as "Idiotic white guys who get butthurt by accusations of racism and immediately come back with bullshit responses are idiots."Moth_Monk said:What point is the comic making?![]()
Meh. Very few of the responses have actually even mentioned the Zimmerman bit, so I'm reasonably certain that's not the reason.EvilRoy said:I've been thinking about that myself, and although I don't see anything that's really worth getting up in arms about, I do think the Zimmerman reference is a little too soon. I mean, whether you agree with the courts decision or not, a kid is dead and a dude was hung by the media. Nobody really 'won', and thanks to the excessive media coverage and conjecture flying around it will probably be years before anyone can dig up the raw facts for themselves and come up with a personally satisfying answer.
Granted, if he did enter the forums and repeat what was said in the comic, he'd probably be ban-hammered rather quickly.chronobreak said:If the authors had any conviction, or any courage, they would be in here to explain their work. They will stay far away and let the click money come in, all while probably having a good laugh at the fiasco they have created. To me, that is cowardice.
http://www.escapistmagazine.com/forums/codeofconduct
Regardless of what some of our content creators may say, do or provoke within their videos or articles, this does not give members the ability to act in the same way. They are entertainers and if they brought their language or flaming into the forums, they would be held accountable, just as any other forum member of The Escapist would be.
It's offensive because it casually makes fun of anyone who is fat, nerdy, short, likes fedoras or statistics, is a brony or works out, by making them negative points of the White Guy Defense Force, the obvious antagonists.Agayek said:Ok, honest question here for everyone:
Why exactly is this comic offensive? What specifically about it is insulting or demeaning or whatever else that would invite such umbrage? From where I'm sitting, there's literally nothing in it to get worked up about.
Is it the put-upon white guys taking up arms against the perceived racism with vaguely defined and poorly-quantified "facts"? Is it the Zimmerman reference? Is it the fact that the black guy dies, like in every action movie ever? Or is it... the fedora?
I can't see the reason why there's 10 pages of angry replies to this, nor why the entire first page is all about how the comic is pure flamebait. I just don't see it.
Someone explain please.
Grey's jumped in before (<link=http://www.escapistmagazine.com/forums/read/6.825461-How-to-Talk-About-Games-3?page=5#20037008>occasionally to hilarious effect), and he says a LOT about his personal perspectives, even seeding his news stories with them.chronobreak said:If the authors had any conviction, or any courage, they would be in here to explain their work. They will stay far away and let the click money come in, all while probably having a good laugh at the fiasco they have created. To me, that is cowardice.
I guess it's to do with "cool move" of riming the hat with two fingers.sageoftruth said:Can anyone explain why White Guy Omega always had his hand on his fedora?