STALKER.Rooster Cogburn said:People like Elder Scrolls games because of the unequaled freedom, roleplaying opportunities, modding opportunities, and realized world they offer. To my knowledge there is nothing else like it and I double-dog dare anyone to prove me wrong.
EDIT: Don't say Fallout.
I find Morrowind, Oblivion and Skyrim are fun without any mods.Conrad Wentzel said:I have discovered that if a game needs a boatload of mods to be fun, then it has issues.lacktheknack said:Because your definition of "crap" is kind of crap.
You seem to be under the impression that people DON'T like modding the crap out of their game, having a meandering experience, having a weak storyline with little consequence, or doing sidequests. This impression is bad, and you should feel bad for having it.
You'd think that people could look at a video game landscape where "Call of Duty", "Starcraft", "Psychonauts", "Myst" and ".flow" all exist, and figure out that people like different things, but they keep a mentality that simply screams "Stop liking what I don't like!"
If only. I'd pre-order that game in a nano-second. I found Fallout 3 a bit meh. New Vegas however was just shy of awesome. Loved it. As you said, if they could get it right, and with these two companies that'd be a big if, it'd be a license to print money.ToastiestZombie said:Don't you reckon that pretty much every gamer who likes TES/Fallout wants Obsidian and Bethesda to team up for the next game. Bethesda's awesome art design, atmosphere and alright bug fixing. And Obsidian's awesome story, gameplay and balancing.
Unless you were flaming the OP saying "YOU HAVE NO RIGHT TO YOUR OPINION BECAUSE YOU SUCK", then I wasn't talking to you.IamLEAM1983 said:...in your opinion. I could retort that FarCry 2 was samey, seeing as you spent the game shooting at dark-skinned fellows you could barely see in the middle of fairly dark and high underbrush. It was flamethrower or bust, for me, as I couldn't aim for shit if the NPCs weren't out in the clear.Silvianoshei said:Skyrim is a MEDIOCRE sandbox...
I could also retort that Just Cause 2 didn't keep my interest because I kept feeling the structure was riffing off of what was happening in Haiti at the time, and because the universe's sheer insistence at setting up a non-specific South Pacific micro-nation that takes after Indonesia as much as it does some of the French colonies didn't feel too successful. I could say the voice acting sucked and that Rico Rodriguez is, generally speaking, an unlikeable douchebag.
I could say all that. I could also say you've been flinging fanboy poo. That wouldn't be too classy of me now, would it?
It's one of these instances where I wonder why this was even brought up as a discussion topic, OP. What were you expecting? Some of us to go "Oh my God, you're right, I've been playing an utter piece of cow dung for the past year!" I can recognize faults in a lot of things I like. Read my post over. I did exactly that. Even so, I like Skyrim. No amount of criticism will change that.
We like something, you don't like it. Let's just leave it at that and avoid assuming things. You can do better, Silvianoshei.
No one is saying he doesn't have a right to his opinion, we're saying he should stop treating his opinion like fact. The only reason OP created this thread was that he could flame or attract a bunch of people who agreed with him so they could validate his opinion. Everyone is just pointing out how pointless this thread is and it should probably be locked since its boiled down to a flame war now.Silvianoshei said:Unless you were flaming the OP saying "YOU HAVE NO RIGHT TO YOUR OPINION BECAUSE YOU SUCK", then I wasn't talking to you.IamLEAM1983 said:...in your opinion. I could retort that FarCry 2 was samey, seeing as you spent the game shooting at dark-skinned fellows you could barely see in the middle of fairly dark and high underbrush. It was flamethrower or bust, for me, as I couldn't aim for shit if the NPCs weren't out in the clear.Silvianoshei said:Skyrim is a MEDIOCRE sandbox...
I could also retort that Just Cause 2 didn't keep my interest because I kept feeling the structure was riffing off of what was happening in Haiti at the time, and because the universe's sheer insistence at setting up a non-specific South Pacific micro-nation that takes after Indonesia as much as it does some of the French colonies didn't feel too successful. I could say the voice acting sucked and that Rico Rodriguez is, generally speaking, an unlikeable douchebag.
I could say all that. I could also say you've been flinging fanboy poo. That wouldn't be too classy of me now, would it?
It's one of these instances where I wonder why this was even brought up as a discussion topic, OP. What were you expecting? Some of us to go "Oh my God, you're right, I've been playing an utter piece of cow dung for the past year!" I can recognize faults in a lot of things I like. Read my post over. I did exactly that. Even so, I like Skyrim. No amount of criticism will change that.
We like something, you don't like it. Let's just leave it at that and avoid assuming things. You can do better, Silvianoshei.
You couldn't say I was flinging fanboy poo, because I wasn't: I was flinging anti-fanboy poo. I have no issue with people liking Skyrim, that would be insanity. What I do have an issue with is people who can't disagree in a coherent or respectful manner.
And I don't want to hear, "This is the internet, you need thick skin", because that I don't think anonymity somehow engenders some acceptable loss of reason in discussions.
I only say "Don't say Fallout" because that's Bethesda's other franchise. I liked New Vegas a lot more than Fallout 3, which I also liked. I thought New Vegas demonstrated an understanding of the strengths and weaknesses of Bethesda titles and made the best of the tools they had. But the best Elder Scrolls-like is Morrowind. =)Conrad Wentzel said:Actually Fallout New Vegas, while a crappy sequel to the Fallout franchise compared to 1 and 2 and at least superior to 3, was by far the best Elder Scrolls-like game ever made. The side quests were fun and interesting, story was great, needed about the same amount of mods as Skyrim, and virtually everything in the game you did actually mattered. Ironically a lot of people hated New Vegas. I don't get it.Rooster Cogburn said:People like Elder Scrolls games because of the unequaled freedom, roleplaying opportunities, modding opportunities, and realized world they offer. To my knowledge there is nothing else like it and I double-dog dare anyone to prove me wrong.
EDIT: Don't say Fallout.
Someone always says STALKER lol. I kid, STALKER really is a good answer. I think Elder Scrolls gives you a little more to work with, but STALKER is the only thing I know of that tries to do something similar.hermes200 said:STALKER.
Basically this. Your free to create any character you want, use any skill you want regardless of class, and progress the story at the pace you want. Bethesda forgoes the polish and ever changing worlds of linear games and decides to give the player a massive world to interact with and explore in anyway they see fit.Rooster Cogburn said:People like Elder Scrolls games because of the unequaled freedom, roleplaying opportunities, modding opportunities, and realized world they offer. To my knowledge there is nothing else like it and I double-dog dare anyone to prove me wrong.
EDIT: Don't say Fallout.
but it doesn't need a boatload of mods to be fun -_-. Seriously, I played vanilla oblivion for atleast 200 hours, probably over 300 on my ps3. then I had fun modding it on my pc. I got skyrim on the pc first and spent about 100 hours without mods. Hell I know someone who has played for over 1000 hours of vanilla Oblivion on the pc. Mods are icing on the cake. They are not needed to make the game fun. The make a great game even greater. If you are to stupid to realize other people have opinions different to you why are you here?Conrad Wentzel said:I have discovered that if a game needs a boatload of mods to be fun, then it has issues.lacktheknack said:Because your definition of "crap" is kind of crap.
You seem to be under the impression that people DON'T like modding the crap out of their game, having a meandering experience, having a weak storyline with little consequence, or doing sidequests. This impression is bad, and you should feel bad for having it.
You'd think that people could look at a video game landscape where "Call of Duty", "Starcraft", "Psychonauts", "Myst" and ".flow" all exist, and figure out that people like different things, but they keep a mentality that simply screams "Stop liking what I don't like!"
because even for someone who love the 2 newer Elder Scrolls games, Morrowind is hard to get into. Partly because of the graphics(for me it is mostly the character models, which weren't good till skyrim), and partly because of the combat. The combat just sucks to the point where mudcrabs almst killed me, MUDCRABS! I have tried getting into Morrowind but I can't. It was a good game for it's time and for people who bought it then but now it isn't fun. Maybe when I try again I will like it but then again maybe I won't. If you haven't guess I am mostly basing this off of my experience.Wayneguard said:My question is how you can pass judgement on the series without playing its crown jewel - Morrowind. When you can see the humor in this picture, then you will know you are ready criticize...
![]()