Why do people like Elder Scrolls games?

Recommended Videos

hermes

New member
Mar 2, 2009
3,864
0
0
Rooster Cogburn said:
People like Elder Scrolls games because of the unequaled freedom, roleplaying opportunities, modding opportunities, and realized world they offer. To my knowledge there is nothing else like it and I double-dog dare anyone to prove me wrong.

EDIT: Don't say Fallout.
STALKER.

I think people like them because they offer something no other game in the consoles comes even close. Its the ultimate sandbox game, where you can go anywhere and be anything that you like... The downside of that is that after some hours, you end up being the king of everything.

I do agree with the first comment that it should take your progress more into account when traversing the game. It is kind of disappointing that you can be emperor of the continent, sorcerer supreme, savior of the world and king of the vampires, yet guards will treat you like crap because they think you are about to steal something...
 

Kyber

New member
Oct 14, 2009
715
0
0
I played 100+ hours of vanilla oblivion and 170+ hours of vanilla skyrim. Loved every minute, our opinions differ in so many ways, I love the freedom, the story, the world and the EVERYTHING.
 

lacktheknack

Je suis joined jewels.
Jan 19, 2009
19,305
0
0
Conrad Wentzel said:
lacktheknack said:
Because your definition of "crap" is kind of crap.

You seem to be under the impression that people DON'T like modding the crap out of their game, having a meandering experience, having a weak storyline with little consequence, or doing sidequests. This impression is bad, and you should feel bad for having it.

You'd think that people could look at a video game landscape where "Call of Duty", "Starcraft", "Psychonauts", "Myst" and ".flow" all exist, and figure out that people like different things, but they keep a mentality that simply screams "Stop liking what I don't like!"
I have discovered that if a game needs a boatload of mods to be fun, then it has issues.
I find Morrowind, Oblivion and Skyrim are fun without any mods.

Boom, I have utterly obliterated your statement.
 

Shinclone

New member
Nov 20, 2011
48
0
0
ToastiestZombie said:
Don't you reckon that pretty much every gamer who likes TES/Fallout wants Obsidian and Bethesda to team up for the next game. Bethesda's awesome art design, atmosphere and alright bug fixing. And Obsidian's awesome story, gameplay and balancing.
If only. I'd pre-order that game in a nano-second. I found Fallout 3 a bit meh. New Vegas however was just shy of awesome. Loved it. As you said, if they could get it right, and with these two companies that'd be a big if, it'd be a license to print money.
 

nexus

New member
May 30, 2012
440
0
0
I've played Skyrim since release day on-and-off... on-and-off.. on, and then off again. I recently patched up with Dawnguard, then proceeded to update all my mods (about 75+ of them) and dove back in. I've played over 250+ hours of Skyrim in total, and I've yet to complete the Main Quest. That should speak for itself about how much I enjoy these games.

It's basically all about the journey, and all about using your imagination. I turned off fast-travel, use a "Hunger, Thirst, Sleep" mod, and a comprehensive weather mod.

I also use a little gem called "Frostfall" which is a hypothermia survival mod. Basically, you can craft "fire kits", tents and a cooking pot. Even when geared up properly to survive the cold, you will have to stop at some point in your journey between outposts to start a fire, or die. If you jump in cold water by accident, you have to find a fire immediately or you freeze to death. It's also regional, so you won't get too cold in Falkreath hold (the south) for instance, unless it rains and you stay wet for too long.

So basically, for me, every quest is a journey, and every journey is an adventure. I use weight tweaks that make it more realistic.. so I can stock up very little in between journeys, forcing me to set up said camps, and hunt for food. Camping out to wait out the hardcore storms because the weather mod makes visibility almost zero for the bad storms, etc.

Yea, so it's fun.
 

chuckdm

New member
Apr 10, 2012
112
0
0
Well...two things:

1) I like RPGs in general. I prefer shooter RPGs (I suck at hack-and-slash anything) but Skyrim has Archery (and lighting spells if you can't be bothered to aim) so I'm happy.

2) I now hate BioWare. Between DA2 and ME3 they have clearly lost whatever skill they had. I'm not sure if maybe some large amount of talent left when EA bought them (talent has a tendency to do that when EA buys a company, heh) but even if their whole team is still there, they're just doing it wrong. I loved Origins. I even loved ME2. (Hell, I never even played ME1 past the first mission...)

So, being disenfranchised with BioWare (and having recently swore off WoW and RiFT), I went looking for another RPG to sink my time into. Skyrim delivers. And keeps on delivering. For several hundred hours and counting.

As to why I like RPGs in general? Not sure. I mean, I play RTS games too (they're really my passion) and play some more typical arcade shooters. Part of the reason I like Rage so much is it blends just the right amount of 3 different genres together - the only flaw in Rage is that it's just WAY too short. (Also, idTech 5 = OpenGL = WINE = Linux = Happy.)
 

Silvianoshei

New member
May 26, 2011
284
0
0
IamLEAM1983 said:
Silvianoshei said:
Skyrim is a MEDIOCRE sandbox...
...in your opinion. I could retort that FarCry 2 was samey, seeing as you spent the game shooting at dark-skinned fellows you could barely see in the middle of fairly dark and high underbrush. It was flamethrower or bust, for me, as I couldn't aim for shit if the NPCs weren't out in the clear.

I could also retort that Just Cause 2 didn't keep my interest because I kept feeling the structure was riffing off of what was happening in Haiti at the time, and because the universe's sheer insistence at setting up a non-specific South Pacific micro-nation that takes after Indonesia as much as it does some of the French colonies didn't feel too successful. I could say the voice acting sucked and that Rico Rodriguez is, generally speaking, an unlikeable douchebag.

I could say all that. I could also say you've been flinging fanboy poo. That wouldn't be too classy of me now, would it?

It's one of these instances where I wonder why this was even brought up as a discussion topic, OP. What were you expecting? Some of us to go "Oh my God, you're right, I've been playing an utter piece of cow dung for the past year!" I can recognize faults in a lot of things I like. Read my post over. I did exactly that. Even so, I like Skyrim. No amount of criticism will change that.

We like something, you don't like it. Let's just leave it at that and avoid assuming things. You can do better, Silvianoshei.
Unless you were flaming the OP saying "YOU HAVE NO RIGHT TO YOUR OPINION BECAUSE YOU SUCK", then I wasn't talking to you.

You couldn't say I was flinging fanboy poo, because I wasn't: I was flinging anti-fanboy poo. I have no issue with people liking Skyrim, that would be insanity. What I do have an issue with is people who can't disagree in a coherent or respectful manner.

And I don't want to hear, "This is the internet, you need thick skin", because that I don't think anonymity somehow engenders some acceptable loss of reason in discussions.
 

Andrewtheeviscerator

It's Leviosahhhhhhh
Feb 23, 2012
563
0
0
Silvianoshei said:
IamLEAM1983 said:
Silvianoshei said:
Skyrim is a MEDIOCRE sandbox...
...in your opinion. I could retort that FarCry 2 was samey, seeing as you spent the game shooting at dark-skinned fellows you could barely see in the middle of fairly dark and high underbrush. It was flamethrower or bust, for me, as I couldn't aim for shit if the NPCs weren't out in the clear.

I could also retort that Just Cause 2 didn't keep my interest because I kept feeling the structure was riffing off of what was happening in Haiti at the time, and because the universe's sheer insistence at setting up a non-specific South Pacific micro-nation that takes after Indonesia as much as it does some of the French colonies didn't feel too successful. I could say the voice acting sucked and that Rico Rodriguez is, generally speaking, an unlikeable douchebag.

I could say all that. I could also say you've been flinging fanboy poo. That wouldn't be too classy of me now, would it?

It's one of these instances where I wonder why this was even brought up as a discussion topic, OP. What were you expecting? Some of us to go "Oh my God, you're right, I've been playing an utter piece of cow dung for the past year!" I can recognize faults in a lot of things I like. Read my post over. I did exactly that. Even so, I like Skyrim. No amount of criticism will change that.

We like something, you don't like it. Let's just leave it at that and avoid assuming things. You can do better, Silvianoshei.
Unless you were flaming the OP saying "YOU HAVE NO RIGHT TO YOUR OPINION BECAUSE YOU SUCK", then I wasn't talking to you.

You couldn't say I was flinging fanboy poo, because I wasn't: I was flinging anti-fanboy poo. I have no issue with people liking Skyrim, that would be insanity. What I do have an issue with is people who can't disagree in a coherent or respectful manner.

And I don't want to hear, "This is the internet, you need thick skin", because that I don't think anonymity somehow engenders some acceptable loss of reason in discussions.
No one is saying he doesn't have a right to his opinion, we're saying he should stop treating his opinion like fact. The only reason OP created this thread was that he could flame or attract a bunch of people who agreed with him so they could validate his opinion. Everyone is just pointing out how pointless this thread is and it should probably be locked since its boiled down to a flame war now.
 

Wayneguard

New member
Jun 12, 2010
2,085
0
0
My question is how you can pass judgement on the series without playing its crown jewel - Morrowind. When you can see the humor in this picture, then you will know you are ready criticize...

 

Rooster Cogburn

New member
May 24, 2008
1,637
0
0
Conrad Wentzel said:
Rooster Cogburn said:
People like Elder Scrolls games because of the unequaled freedom, roleplaying opportunities, modding opportunities, and realized world they offer. To my knowledge there is nothing else like it and I double-dog dare anyone to prove me wrong.

EDIT: Don't say Fallout.
Actually Fallout New Vegas, while a crappy sequel to the Fallout franchise compared to 1 and 2 and at least superior to 3, was by far the best Elder Scrolls-like game ever made. The side quests were fun and interesting, story was great, needed about the same amount of mods as Skyrim, and virtually everything in the game you did actually mattered. Ironically a lot of people hated New Vegas. I don't get it.
I only say "Don't say Fallout" because that's Bethesda's other franchise. I liked New Vegas a lot more than Fallout 3, which I also liked. I thought New Vegas demonstrated an understanding of the strengths and weaknesses of Bethesda titles and made the best of the tools they had. But the best Elder Scrolls-like is Morrowind. =)
hermes200 said:
Someone always says STALKER lol. I kid, STALKER really is a good answer. I think Elder Scrolls gives you a little more to work with, but STALKER is the only thing I know of that tries to do something similar.
 

Blatherscythe

New member
Oct 14, 2009
2,217
0
0
Rooster Cogburn said:
People like Elder Scrolls games because of the unequaled freedom, roleplaying opportunities, modding opportunities, and realized world they offer. To my knowledge there is nothing else like it and I double-dog dare anyone to prove me wrong.

EDIT: Don't say Fallout.
Basically this. Your free to create any character you want, use any skill you want regardless of class, and progress the story at the pace you want. Bethesda forgoes the polish and ever changing worlds of linear games and decides to give the player a massive world to interact with and explore in anyway they see fit.

Combine that with mod support and you have a game that will almost never cease to be interesting.

And Bethesda has gotten better at making their worlds feel more organic, if they added a bit more depth, got a few more voice actors, worked on their narrative and RPG elements a bit, and made the world feel more dynamic the Elder Scrolls would be an almost perfect RPG.
 

Cabisco

New member
May 7, 2009
2,433
0
0
Yes it's a sandbox adventure game with sword and not guns etc, but really I think it's biggest draw is that it's got a AAA budget.

A lot of games have similar qualities to elder scrolls but it's the extra money (meaning more and better) which makes it stand above the rest, at least in my eyes. That and Bethesda really do know what they are doing when they are making their games and again have the money and time to really make it work.
 

Goofguy

New member
Nov 25, 2010
3,862
0
0
It's fun and I can do whatever the hell I want.

Pro-tip: just because you don't like something, doesn't mean others shouldn't either.
 

The_Lost_King

New member
Oct 7, 2011
1,504
0
0
Conrad Wentzel said:
lacktheknack said:
Because your definition of "crap" is kind of crap.

You seem to be under the impression that people DON'T like modding the crap out of their game, having a meandering experience, having a weak storyline with little consequence, or doing sidequests. This impression is bad, and you should feel bad for having it.

You'd think that people could look at a video game landscape where "Call of Duty", "Starcraft", "Psychonauts", "Myst" and ".flow" all exist, and figure out that people like different things, but they keep a mentality that simply screams "Stop liking what I don't like!"
I have discovered that if a game needs a boatload of mods to be fun, then it has issues.
but it doesn't need a boatload of mods to be fun -_-. Seriously, I played vanilla oblivion for atleast 200 hours, probably over 300 on my ps3. then I had fun modding it on my pc. I got skyrim on the pc first and spent about 100 hours without mods. Hell I know someone who has played for over 1000 hours of vanilla Oblivion on the pc. Mods are icing on the cake. They are not needed to make the game fun. The make a great game even greater. If you are to stupid to realize other people have opinions different to you why are you here?
 

The_Lost_King

New member
Oct 7, 2011
1,504
0
0
Wayneguard said:
My question is how you can pass judgement on the series without playing its crown jewel - Morrowind. When you can see the humor in this picture, then you will know you are ready criticize...

because even for someone who love the 2 newer Elder Scrolls games, Morrowind is hard to get into. Partly because of the graphics(for me it is mostly the character models, which weren't good till skyrim), and partly because of the combat. The combat just sucks to the point where mudcrabs almst killed me, MUDCRABS! I have tried getting into Morrowind but I can't. It was a good game for it's time and for people who bought it then but now it isn't fun. Maybe when I try again I will like it but then again maybe I won't. If you haven't guess I am mostly basing this off of my experience.
 

karcentric

New member
Dec 28, 2011
1,383
0
0
Oblivion wasn't my cup of tea, looked kinda nice when it was released but something about it didn't flick my switch. I liked Skyrim, but my favorite by was Morrowind, I won't lie, I had no idea what I supposed to do or where to go until I was level 47, but by that time I'd explored nearly the entire island. Which kinda made the story a little easy being that I could clobber anyone into dust.

And once that was done I started modding and downloading mods, which essentially reinvented the game, adding all sorts of great and not so great stuff.

So to answer the question why I like Elder Scrolls... The mods.
 

Cid Silverwing

Paladin of The Light
Jul 27, 2008
3,133
0
0
I too have a major problem with Bethesda's IP in that all you seem to do is run around and do quests. No one even talks up your achievements. I don't feel like a champion when no one acknowledges that I killed that bigass dragon DIRECTLY next to me that 10+ NPC's WITNESSED.

Is why I name Skyrim as the worst game of its release year.
 

PinkiePyro

New member
Sep 26, 2010
1,120
0
0
I say to each their own everyone has different tastes in games just like food the openness or settings might just not be your thing

I for one love sandbox games because because of the vastness and in parallel generally have a diastase for old school level platformers they are small and repetive

skyrim (cant speak for the others in the series though) is one of my favorites I love midevil settings and the Norse feel is different but still familer its got a nice mix of terrain and I love just roaming about for hours if you roam about you can find some really intersting stuff not part of the normal quests some of my favorites are the killer witch near riverwood (she acts nice but don't go in the secret door)
I also once found a body that was tied to a rock mafia style at the bottom of a lake

anyhow short version inless you are a critic or have actual flaws you want to point out dont go calling a game crap just becuse its not your taste

I dislike megaman and (going back to the food) swiss cheese but you don't see me running about griping about them
 

Mirroga

New member
Jun 6, 2009
1,119
0
0
Actually my favorite form of freedom are just refined sandboxes. My exmaples would be Arkham City and Infamous 2. Even though I gave example that Fallout 3, Fallout:NV, and Skyrim would be the best examples of having a lot of freedom in games, giving games way too much freedom gives too much of a loose and randomized experience. It could be a selling point, but it makes for an unrefined gaming experience. To me Freedom =/= randomized experience. Well that's my opinion because my favorite randomized experience were Binding of Isaac and Frozen Synapse.