Windows 8 Will Be a "Real New Push Into PC Gaming"

Notthatbright

New member
Apr 13, 2010
169
0
0
What they really said: "We're going to use all of our resources to compete with Steam".

And fail, but on the plus side, we'll get more games on the PC in 2012.
 

SenseOfTumour

New member
Jul 11, 2008
4,514
0
0
I don't really get the hate for the 360 pad tho, yes the mouse and keyboard is a far superior control system.

For SOME genres.

However, looking at my games list at present, GRID, Dirt 2, Burnout Paradise, Beat Hazard, Batman AA, StreetFighter IV, GTA IV, Psychonauts, Just Cause 2, it goes on... ALL better with a pad.

Sure, mouse n keys, better for Civ and sequels, FPS games and more, but don't just cast the pad aside, and personally, it's a big bonus, having a 360 pad meaning I just know it's going to work, with no setup.
 

AgDr_ODST

Cortana's guardian
Oct 22, 2009
9,317
0
0
im content with sticking to cautious optimism so I won't be crushed when/if it all goes to shi- OMMFGBBQS thier relaunching Flight Simulator!!!!!!!!! Microsoft rocks!!!!!!!!!!!!!
 

GrizzlerBorno

New member
Sep 2, 2010
2,295
0
0
What? EIGHT! Why the hell Microsoft? Don't do it! XP was a decent OS, and that ran fine for 5-6 years. Well, i like 7. It's flashy and a little crash prone (a dollar for every memory dump, please, Mr. Gates?) but i Love it. it's clean, i can find stuff easily, and the new taskbar is a good idea that works. Please don't abandon Windows7 for 4-5 more years! By then, i'll get completely used to working on a mac and won't care anymore.

...oooh Burn!!
 

Shinrae

New member
Sep 15, 2010
71
0
0
It might have been mentioned already but, my confusion has resulted in me reading no more than the op and half first page here, but. Didn't they say 7 would be their last OS?
After which they'd be calling it quits / working on some cloud based system or something?
 

spider-dork

New member
Oct 6, 2010
13
0
0
Nimbus said:
John the Gamer said:
Nimbus said:
Every notice how basically every other Windows OS sucks balls? 7, good. Vista bad. XP good. ME bad. 98 good. 95 bad.

Looks like they're right on track for a giant flop.
you forgot 2000.
How are 2000 and ME different?
ME is based on Windows 9x platform 2000 is based on the NT platform. XP is just 2000 with a "prettier" interface and some key components renamed (there are some under the hood changes but too few to mention).

OT:
OpenGL in favor of DirectX ftw!!!, but I know that wont happen. So maybe a safemode-like setting that runs the bare minimum OS so games have more available resources? That would be sweet!
 

Deathman101

New member
Sep 22, 2009
233
0
0
Issue here being their step forward will likely go anti-piracy (my guess anyway), which will more than stir the PC gaming population a bit.
 

Sajuuk-khar

New member
Oct 31, 2009
180
0
0
Ephraim J. Witchwood said:
Cocamaster said:
Color me uninformed, but what exactly is all this hate towards Games for Windows Live stemming from?

To me the Games for Windows client is just a crappy digital download service, but the GFWL elements implemented in the games is actually a good thing to me.

I would LOVE to have this being part of the entire gaming environment on PC, a-la Xbox Live, rather than the way it is now (game dependant).

Am I alone on this?
Nope. I've had zero issues with GFWL (mainly because I fucking UPDATE MY COMPUTER), and would love to see a true cross platform environment, as I have many friends on the 360, but there aren't too many games that I'm interested in for it (anymore). Give me party chat on the PC across to the 360, and they can charge me as much as they want to per year.
The point is MS launched GfWL as being the saviour of PC gaming. Instead it locked the platform down by forcing people to login to a digital service (at least once to register) and not exactly being mod-friendly for it's games. Aside from that MS introduced Silver and Gold subscriptions (simmilar to Xbox) which were later dropped because nobody bothered to buy gold.

Aside from that, devs apparently don't really like it either as what I've heard MS charges them (or used to) for updates/patches after the first few... which comes back onto the gamers because they just don't get much fixes.
 

alinos

New member
Nov 18, 2009
256
0
0
archvile93 said:
Just more lies and empty promises to get people's hopes up. i love how they promised it years from now so everyone will forget about what they promised and won't call them out when they don't deliver. You really want me to think you haven't abandonned the PC Microsoft? Here's what you do.

1. Finish the Halo and Gears series on PC.
2. Stop making us wait longer for the PC version of 360 games that turns out to be a half assed, shoddily done port. Seriously, when was the last time this didn't happen?
3. Stop making the vast majority of the 360 library 360 exclusives.

What you shouldn't do is keep making empty promises.
1. Stop making the 360

extra point's which could be helpful

2. Get a consensus about a minimum,medium and a Maximum Computer spec setup that every 12-18 month's drop's medium to minimum and maximum to medium, so that people can know by buying Series xx card they will have 1-2 cycles of graphics(ie you buy medium you get 2-3yrs out of it before your next required upgrade)

3. Create a user friendly way for people to link there computers to their TV's so that even moron's can figure out how to use their PC as a console.
 

Nouw

New member
Mar 18, 2009
15,615
0
0
You know guys, at least they're fucking trying; I'd rather have enthusiasm and fails than no effort and nothing getting done.
 

Virgil

#virgil { display:none; }
Legacy
Jun 13, 2002
1,507
0
41
Andy Chalk said:
Bill Gates personally promised the world for PC gaming with Windows 95 and while I don't think it was quite as bad as some folks make it out to be, it's sure not what we were expecting, either.
I don't know what you're talking about, Windows 95 was a huge leap for PC gaming. The boot disks were gone. Wrestling to get mice, joysticks, and sound cards to work in every game was almost a thing of the past. Not to mention that DirectX and the driver architecture in 95 practically paved the way for modern day video cards and 3D accelerators. I'd go so far to say that 95 was the biggest single technological leap towards making PC gaming a viable market for the kind of people that don't build their own computers.
 

Locko96

New member
Jan 18, 2010
407
0
0
Aren't all of these updates Window's "major pushes into PC Gaming"? All of these pale in comparison to Steam or LIVE (can't say much for PSN. Don't use it.)
 

UnravThreads

New member
Aug 10, 2009
809
0
0
archvile93 said:
Just more lies and empty promises to get people's hopes up. i love how they promised it years from now so everyone will forget about what they promised and won't call them out when they don't deliver. You really want me to think you haven't abandonned the PC Microsoft? Here's what you do.

1. Finish the Halo and Gears series on PC.
2. Stop making us wait longer for the PC version of 360 games that turns out to be a half assed, shoddily done port. Seriously, when was the last time this didn't happen?
3. Stop making the vast majority of the 360 library 360 exclusives.

What you shouldn't do is keep making empty promises.
I like the way you think.

To be honest, all this talk of "new pushes into gaming" and "better visuals" is a load of bull, whether it's from Microshaft or someone else. Gaming is stuck on DX9 at the moment, and until the next gen of consoles appears, 64bit becomes more mainstream (As it is with Win 7) and Win XP is discontinued from service, nothing will change. Some titles'll be Vista/7 exclusive (Like Just Cause 2) but until XP goes at the very earliest, we just won't see any real change for the PC.
 

Jumwa

New member
Jun 21, 2010
641
0
0
More Fun To Compute said:
Jumwa said:
Microsoft has no interest in "saving" PC gaming (as if it needed to be saved). They make more money due to royalties and fees from selling Xbox games. The vast, vast majourity of games made for Windows never see a penny going to Microsoft.

That's why they have--and will continue to--sabotage PC gaming by buying exclusive rights and preventing or delaying the release of PC titles.
The amount of money they make from xbox games is pathetic compared to windows licences.
As far as I know you don't need to pay a dime to Microsoft to make a game run on Windows if that's what you're trying to say.
 

Luke5515

New member
Aug 25, 2008
1,197
0
0
Well well, Microsoft saying that they will begin supporting pc gamers better yet again. Maybe they should just have a constant press conference saying this just switching off from announcer to announcer so one can sleep and the other can lie. I'll believe it when I see it.
 

Crimsane

New member
Apr 11, 2009
914
0
0
Sorry Microsoft, but I'll believe it when I see it. You suffer from Company Who Cried PC Gaming syndrome, so many false promises in the past.
 

Terramax

New member
Jan 11, 2008
3,747
0
0
Microsoft could revolutionise gaming, but if it means having to use Windows Live then I'm not buying it.
 

More Fun To Compute

New member
Nov 18, 2008
4,061
0
0
Jumwa said:
As far as I know you don't need to pay a dime to Microsoft to make a game run on Windows if that's what you're trying to say.
I'm talking about windows division profits.



Maybe they make a few dollars from selling games on GFWL or from Games for Windows branding but who cares really.
 

Volothos

New member
Dec 31, 2008
326
0
0
laryri said:
They aren't going to make GFWL part of the OS are they? Please tell me they aren't.
I thought the exact same thing... i hope they don't do that