When the person debating with her (Samuel) explains he wants to know, so as to expand his knowledge of her argument to understand the list:II) I?m answering your question with a question: Whether it is or isn?t, how is that relevant to you? How does that relate to your own behavior?
TL;DR on that last one: "I'm not answering your question, because if you want to prove you're not approving of rape, you should stop arguing with me, and follow the list I set out."As for why men shouldn?t be focused on whether I would apply the list to women? Because what I am saying is that, if individual men are serious about fixing these issues then they should be considering the part they play in this mess, rather than spending their time trying to play gotcha with whatever ?crazy? feminist has come across their path. It?s not at all intellectually dishonest for me to refuse to play that game ? if a man considers my post to be a legitimate social critique, then it shouldn?t matter to him whether I, personally, would apply it to women. That simply isn?t relevant and, again, it?s placing the onus for fixing his problems on women. That isn?t what this blog is about. And if a man does not consider my post to be a legitimate social critique, then, again, it shouldn?t matter to him whether I apply it to women, because he doesn?t consider it to have merit in the first place.
If it isn't a word then it should be =PMackheath said:You use a lot of generalitivity (if thats a word) but I agree. =p
Also love the avatar. Wish I had those dance moves.
I usually grit my teeth and politely disagree with them, which apparently goes over their head completely. Maybe I should try your method? Damn my indecisive and submissive nature![footnote]Which has nothing to do with my effing gender! ARGH[/footnote] *shakes fist*Fiz_The_Toaster said:(SNIPPED SOME)
I sure as hell am.
It's like, then go live on an island if you're so sure that you can do a better job, and leave me alone. That whole crap makes me want to rip my ears out. Typically I start being that asshole that starts making terrible comments, and it's funny watching the person saying that hear "their fellow gender" saying such things.
If feminism is what it is supposed to be, by your account, would it not be better to call it Sexual Egalitarianism? The name alone, in that it implies a preference for the concerns of women, rather than the concerns of men, is going to always be divisive.OmniscientOstrich said:Feminism:
1. Belief in the social, political, and economic equality of the sexes.
Misandry:
Hatred of men.
Apparantly there are a fair few men on this site who lack the possession of a dictionary. Feminism is not misandry, it does not stand for female superiority, feminists are individuals of both genders with their own perspectives, methods, ideologies and morality all united under the one same desire to bring gender equality to fruition. That's it, please keep this in mind when posting on threads pertaining to gender politics.
OT: I'm a guy and consider myself inferior to a lot of men and women, which I judge on an individual basis, regardless of gender.
It's quite effective, the only thing is, it's really hard not to smirk or chuckle when they loose their shit. It usually ends with me being called a ***** and I get to call them pot!trollnystan said:I usually grit my teeth and politely disagree with them, which apparently goes over their head completely. Maybe I should try your method? Damn my indecisive and submissive nature![footnote]Which has nothing to do with my effing gender! ARGH[/footnote] *shakes fist*Fiz_The_Toaster said:(SNIPPED SOME)
I sure as hell am.
It's like, then go live on an island if you're so sure that you can do a better job, and leave me alone. That whole crap makes me want to rip my ears out. Typically I start being that asshole that starts making terrible comments, and it's funny watching the person saying that hear "their fellow gender" saying such things.
I seriously don't know what those people - I say people because I've heard men say it too - are thinking when they say things like that. Who the hell put our gender on a fucking pedestal and how do I get off this thing? I'm afraid of heights.
Oh and if you're making a sandwich, can I have one too?
Unfortunately, this happens a lot on all topics and groups. Course because the Bill O'Reilly theory (I'm louder so I'm right) has been implemented into many of our politics this of course has made it harder to distinguish who has legit ideas/concerns and who isn't loud and crazy.the spud said:First things first, I am a man.
OK, now that we have that out of the way, I think that all these threads saying "OMG feminism is bad" make one common mistake; they apply the ideals of radicals of a small minority of members and apply them to the whole group.
That seems a little redundant, you could have just said you were literate.retyopy said:non-illiterate
A rose by any other name would smell as sweet. The name itself means nothing, there are plenty of words that sound much different to their meaning, but the above is the dictionary defintion of what Feminism stands for. The name isn't the issue, it's people who make sweeping generalisations on the basis of an extreme minority within the movement and subsequently associate feminism with misandrist doctrine that are the problem. If they're too ignorant to notice the difference, I don't think the same principles under a different name is going to do much to assuage them. Besides, changing the name isn't going to stop the people with more extreme beliefs hijacking it to push their own prejuidiced dogma.CentralScrtnzr said:If feminism is what it is supposed to be, by your account, would it not be better to call it Sexual Egalitarianism? The name alone, in that it implies a preference for the concerns of women, rather than the concerns of men, is going to always be divisive.OmniscientOstrich said:Feminism:
1. Belief in the social, political, and economic equality of the sexes.
Misandry:
Hatred of men.
Apparantly there are a fair few men on this site who lack the possession of a dictionary. Feminism is not misandry, it does not stand for female superiority, feminists are individuals of both genders with their own perspectives, methods, ideologies and morality all united under the one same desire to bring gender equality to fruition. That's it, please keep this in mind when posting on threads pertaining to gender politics.
OT: I'm a guy and consider myself inferior to a lot of men and women, which I judge on an individual basis, regardless of gender.
Myself personally? Depends on the man I suppose, or group of men. Same would go for the question "Do you consider yourself superior to women?" as well. Which is to say the questions seems to really be: "Do you consider yourself superior?" to anyone, really. In what area? Morally? Intellectually? Physically? Looks? Net worth? Over all? The person who says yes to that would have to be pretty arrogant indeed.retyopy said:Now, I must first ask that you don't dogpile me under mountainous piles of shit and hatred. I'm just asking a question, so theres no need to get all crazy about it. And, without further delay, on with the thread!
So lately, what with all of these "zomgz feminists r bad" and the equally retarded comments that dogpile them under mountainous piles of shit and hatred, (see what I did right there?) I'm getting the feeling that quite a few woman consider themselves superior to men. Plus, being non-illiterate, I read books, and one female character will ineviatably turn to another female character and say, "use your superior feminine amazing brainpower to get the retarded man-children under control," or something along those lines.
And now I wish to know: Do you consider yourself superior to men? And if you do, justify your answer.
So... Yeah.
....... Oh! Sorry, went into drooling-Homer mode. That is one yummy looking sandwich. Yeah, that'll do juuuuuuuuuust fine. *creepy look in eyes*Fiz_The_Toaster said:SNIPPITY SNIP
I know, it's an inside joke.Katherine Ciesla said:Myself personally? Depends on the man I suppose, or group of men. Same would go for the question "Do you consider yourself superior to women?" as well. Which is to say the questions seems to really be: "Do you consider yourself superior?" to anyone, really. In what area? Morally? Intellectually? Physically? Looks? Net worth? Over all? The person who says yes to that would have to be pretty arrogant indeed.retyopy said:Now, I must first ask that you don't dogpile me under mountainous piles of shit and hatred. I'm just asking a question, so theres no need to get all crazy about it. And, without further delay, on with the thread!
So lately, what with all of these "zomgz feminists r bad" and the equally retarded comments that dogpile them under mountainous piles of shit and hatred, (see what I did right there?) I'm getting the feeling that quite a few woman consider themselves superior to men. Plus, being non-illiterate, I read books, and one female character will ineviatably turn to another female character and say, "use your superior feminine amazing brainpower to get the retarded man-children under control," or something along those lines.
And now I wish to know: Do you consider yourself superior to men? And if you do, justify your answer.
So... Yeah.
I know what you're trying to ask, but it's a bit of a silly question.
(Also, and this is not to be mean, but because I'm in a class about this right now and happened to catch it: non-illiterate is .... literate would be the proper word to use.)
Yes, I do believe that answers that question quite nicely, hilariously I might add.BlindTom said:Let me allow these ladies (as representatives of their entire gender) to answer your question.
No no, ogle away, I make amazing sandwiches. Although I've never had someone look creepily into one, just as long as you don't do anything that's not kosher with it, have at it.trollnystan said:....... Oh! Sorry, went into drooling-Homer mode. That is one yummy looking sandwich. Yeah, that'll do juuuuuuuuuust fine. *creepy look in eyes*Fiz_The_Toaster said:SNIPPITY SNIP