you know... Apple bundle Safari with their OS, and - incidentally - they bundle the HARDWARE with their OS (or may as well).
so what? just because they SUCK at making a monopoly out of their anti-competitive ways, they're ok?
doesn't seem fair to me...
either way, I think bundling a browser with your OS is perfectly fine. you don't HAVE to use it, it doesn't cost more than to not have it bundled...
with MS, it seems like everyone (by which i mean, the 'regulators') is still sore over the dodgy ways MS made a monopoly in the operating system market... but rather than actually going to the source, and punishing them properly FOR THAT, the actual thing they did wrong, they seem to have just given up and in a show of bad sportsmanship seem to now go after them for all the 'monopolies' that develop as a side effect of letting them get away with the big one! things - such as the BS EU browser case - that would be perfectly acceptable if it wasn't for them already having a monopoly in the area that counts... hence, apple get away with it, and MS don't.
too bad. you lost. either do something to fix the ACTUAL UNDERLYING problem, or stfu, because BS cases like the EU with IE, just suck.
now, if there was reason for there to be only ONE OS used, for reasons of practicality and efficiency, then sure, the lucky duck who got to make it would have to be neutral and unbiased as to what software was run on it. but, though it may look that way, that is CERTAINLY not the case.