Although it still most likely also cost them far less than big games on PS5, given their tech is at least a generation or two behind. Maybe they figure shelling out for VA’s is enough justification now, idk. They’re only doing it because that’s the “new norm” and they know with it being Zelda, people will pay it.
Doesn't matter at this point, cuz people are still gullible or dumb enough to click bait. Especially those YouTube reactionaries. They think they're smart and above the system but they're playing into its and Kotaku's hands.
I agree, but depends on who you're talking about. There are plenty of psychotic fans that were happy at the aspect of somebody being blacklisted for a negative review. You and I both know this.
Oh right, the Tears of the Kingdom leaks.
Yeah but you can't hold crazy fans as the standard for ruleset. There are crazy people online, big shock, it shouldn't be the basis for anything.
Link will use a sword and some other breakable shit, and uh...good will win probably. lol
A person can when it has happened often, or said psychotic fans harass somebody for a negative review or just pointing out a problem with a game. To the point that this has been "normalized" in the industry. Said psychotic fans will just harass people for having seizures from a game. That means you Cyberpunk 2077 psychotic fans.
tbf, it's more about the mechanics and gameplay, and there has been a LOT of speculation and prognostication about this game, more than most- the amount of "open-worldness," whether dungeons will have more of a presence, how weapon degradation will evolve, how the sky areas will play into it, etc and so on. And when the first trailers should LInk building a raft that opened up all sorts of possibilities.
Sure, but those aren't the kind of leaks that you can easily spoil yourself on by seeing the wrong thumbnail.
What setting was that? I thought the Final Fantasy settings were conjured up from the fantasy of the people at Square Enix.
They are but they are always based on some fashion of medieval Western Europe and classic fantasy settings like that.
And the strength of fantasy is that you can include anything you want, like a gunblade, a ninja clan, an airship or mountable chickens, so I don't think using "history" as an argument holds much water.
Even making a fantasy world, history and culture will still matter an impact how that world is envisioned. Being a Japanese developed game they are going to be influenced by their vision of classic fantasy if that's the world they plan on creating.
As Yoshi said when he was asked that question, it's an argument of what they visioned.
Every possible story has already been told. We're just repainting the sets and making new props.
www.digitaltrends.com
I don't like defending Kotaku because generally speaking Kotaku has done nothing wrong, so when I invariably read a Kotaku article to see what people are getting pissy about this month I say "wait, that's it?" and I am mad that I have once again been bamboozled into reading a Kotaku article.
