Wow, you must be a genius, you managed to come up with that all by yourself? Did you hear how he explained the 2.5D games? It's a game where you got 3D rendered backgrounds, with 2D controls. It's not a correct term if you want to be a ***** about it, but game developers use it, not only Yatzee. It's a term that's been around for a long time, and if you haven't caught up with it maybe you should think it through before whining about it at a place where the term is explained perfectly.spleenboy said:You can have half a dimension >.>
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LO2aCVlnLowFrankvz said:How could it be 3.5 it would have half of the 4th dimension but there is no such thing as 4th dimension
No such thing as the 4th dimension? Since when?Frankvz said:How could it be 3.5 it would have half of the 4th dimension but there is no such thing as 4th dimensionRevelo said:So dimensions can be cut into half now can it. Whats 3.5D going to be like?
Still, I doubt I would buy Xplosion Man anyway, if not because it sounds like a cheap portal knock off but mainly as I only buy classic games I miss a lot. Like Sonic 2.
Haha, i will not fall for such charlatanry, fools. Everyone knows there are FIVE dimensionsruntheplacered said:No such thing as the 4th dimension? Since when?Frankvz said:How could it be 3.5 it would have half of the 4th dimension but there is no such thing as 4th dimensionRevelo said:So dimensions can be cut into half now can it. Whats 3.5D going to be like?
Still, I doubt I would buy Xplosion Man anyway, if not because it sounds like a cheap portal knock off but mainly as I only buy classic games I miss a lot. Like Sonic 2.
I have failed to EVER hear anything about a Sierpinski Gasket being partially dimensional. And relating to another post buried in here. I have also failed to meet a scientist whom believes that times is considered a partial dimension either; the only thing I've ever heard is that time is 4th dimensional. [link]http://www.tenthdimension.com/flash2.php[/link]. This explains it better than I could.paste said:Actually, you can have half a dimension, e.g. the Cantor set or Sierpinski Gasket
Then you have failed to read much about the Sierpinski Gasket. Check wikipedia, or if you actually want to learn about it, read Chaos and Fractals by Peitgen et al.Fr331anc3r said:I have failed to EVER hear anything about a Sierpinski Gasket being partially dimensional. And relating to another post buried in here. I have also failed to meet a scientist whom believes that times is considered a partial dimension either; the only thing I've ever heard is that time is 4th dimensional. [link]http://www.tenthdimension.com/flash2.php[/link]. This explains it better than I could.paste said:Actually, you can have half a dimension, e.g. the Cantor set or Sierpinski Gasket
What is dp? I you mean why he doesn't do WiiWare it's because he hates the Wii and considers the system to be a complete waste of time and money.zombie711 said:why cant yahtzee dp wiiware
My bad I hit the wrong key and I think he might like wiiware because it's sticks to basics but in a woundedful way that only wii can (eyes start to twinkle and grow huge)GamingAwesome1 said:What is dp? I you mean why he doesn't do WiiWare it's because he hates the Wii and considers the system to be a complete waste of time and money.zombie711 said:why cant yahtzee dp wiiware
I'm not saying I disagree with you, cos the WiiWare does have some good games on it. It's just as I stated above Yahtzee hates the Wii. He doesn't like the games on it so I doubt the WiiWare will convince him to review it.zombie711 said:My bad I hit the wrong key and I think he might like wiiware because it's sticks to basics but in a woundedful way that only wii can (eyes start to twinkle and grow huge)GamingAwesome1 said:What is dp? I you mean why he doesn't do WiiWare it's because he hates the Wii and considers the system to be a complete waste of time and money.zombie711 said:why cant yahtzee dp wiiware